Z X Yu et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 156223 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/15/156223
Z X Yu1,2, M A Van Hove2, S Y Tong2, David Wisbey3, Ya B Losovyj3,4, Ning Wu5, M Manno5, L Wang5, C Leighton5, W N Mei3,6 and P A Dowben3,7
Show affiliationsQuantitative low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) has been used to determine the structure of the cubic CoS2 (100)-(1 × 1) surface. The clearly favoured structural model from the LEED analysis is the 1S-terminated (1 × 1) surface, in which the S–S dimer is intact and the terminal surface layer retains a complete S–Co–S sandwich structure. The surface S atoms move outwards towards the vacuum while the subsurface Co atoms move towards the bulk, by approximately 0.03 and 0.11 Å, respectively. In addition, the S atoms in the third sublayer relax outwards by about 0.12 Å, thus providing an indication of a stronger S–S dimer bond and a denser surface region. The complete atomic coordinates of the S–Co–S surface layers are determined in this analysis.
68.35.B- Structure of clean surfaces (and surface reconstruction)
Issue 15 (16 April 2007)
Received 8 January 2007, in final form 23 January 2007
Published 26 March 2007
A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 249001
Z X Yu et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 156223
M. Okabayashi et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125003
J Purans et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012063
A Gasmi et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 225408
Alexander Stotland et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 262001
V Prasad et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 113102
-symmetric deformations of Calogero models
Andreas Fring and Miloslav Znojil 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 194010
L Sciortino et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012125
Rui-Feng Lu et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 225601
David K Ferry 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 474201