J A Venables et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 S411 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/16/S03
J A Venables1,2,5, L Giordano3 and J H Harding4
Show affiliationsIt is well established that nucleation of metal clusters on oxide and halide surfaces is typically dominated by defect sites. Rate equation models of defect nucleation have been developed and applied to these systems. By comparing the models with nucleation density experiments, energies for defect trapping, adsorption, surface diffusion and pair binding have been deduced in favourable cases, notably for Pd deposited on Ar-cleaved MgO(001). However, the defects responsible remain largely unknown. More recently, several types of ab initio calculation have been presented of these energies for Pd and related metals on MgO(001) containing several types of surface defect; these calculated values are surveyed, and some are widely divergent. New rate equation nucleation density predictions are presented using the calculated values. Some calculations, for some defect types, are much closer to experiment than others; the singly charged Fs+ centre and the neutral divacancy emerge as candidate defects. In these two cases, the Pd/MgO(001) nucleation density predictions agree well with experiment, and the corresponding surface defects deserve to be taken seriously. Energy and entropy values are discussed in the light of differences in calculated charge redistribution between the metal atoms, clusters and (charged) surface defects, and (assumed or calculated) cluster geometries.
68.47.Jn Clusters on oxide surfaces
68.35.Md Surface thermodynamics, surface energies
68.43.Bc Ab initio calculations of adsorbate structure and reactions
Issue 16 (26 April 2006)
Received 23 August 2005
Published 3 April 2006
J A Venables et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 S411
James L Bedford et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 N167
A E Carte 1961 Proc. Phys. Soc. 77 757
Sergey Y Yurish et al 2005 Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 1660
Gary J Nutt 1996 Distrib. Syst. Engng. 3 276
Wang Ren-Guo and Long Zhang-Cai 2007 Chinese Phys. Lett. 24 275
Pauline Barmby and John P. Huchra 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 6
F J Turvey 2001 J. Radiol. Prot. 21 317
molecules: dependence on laser intensity
Jainab Khatun and Krishna Rai Dastidar 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32 373
I M Katz and E J Shaughnessy 1987 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 20 561