Graham L Randall et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 S173 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/14/S03
Graham L Randall1,2, B Montgomery Pettitt1,2, Gregory R Buck3 and E Lynn Zechiedrich1,4
Show affiliationsType II topoisomerases resolve problematic DNA topologies such as knots, catenanes, and supercoils that arise as a consequence of DNA replication and recombination. Failure to remove problematic DNA topologies prohibits cell division and can result in cell death or genetic mutation. Such catastrophic consequences make topoisomerases an effective target for antibiotics and anticancer agents. Despite their biological and clinical importance, little is understood about how a topoisomerase differentiates DNA topologies in a molecule that is significantly larger than the topoisomerase itself. It has been proposed that type II topoisomerases recognize angle and curvature between two DNA helices characteristic of knotted and catenated DNA to account for the enzyme's preference to unlink instead of link DNA. Here we consider the electrostatic potential of DNA juxtapositions to determine the possibility of juxtapositions occurring through Brownian diffusion. We found that despite the large negative electrostatic potential formed between two juxtaposed DNA helices, a bulk counterion concentration as small as 50 mM provides sufficient electrostatic screening to prohibit significant interaction beyond an interhelical separation of 3 nm in both hooked and free juxtapositions. This suggests that instead of electrostatics, mechanical forces such as those occurring in anaphase, knots, catenanes, or the writhe of supercoiled DNA may be responsible for the formation of DNA juxtapositions.
87.15.K- Molecular interactions; membrane-protein interactions
Issue 14 (12 April 2006)
Received 11 October 2005, in final form 4 January 2006
Published 24 March 2006
Graham L Randall et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 S173
Chang-Hwan Choi and Chang-Jin Kim 2006 Nanotechnology 17 5326
K Hannewald et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 2023
Frank Dennis et al 2007 J. Radiol. Prot. 27 A3
Alexander Warmuth et al. 2009 ApJ 699 917
Tomoaki Nagaoka et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 6695
L Petridis and E M Terentjev 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 9693
Ibrahim Akduman and Rainer Kress 2002 Inverse Problems 18 1659
E. Thrane et al. 2009 ApJ 704 503
J W Durkee Jr et al 1998 Phys. Med. Biol. 43 2975