P W Anderson et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 R755 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/24/R02
P W Anderson1, P A Lee2, M Randeria3, T M Rice4, N Trivedi3 and F C Zhang5,6
Show affiliationsOne of the first theoretical proposals for understanding high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates was Anderson's RVB theory using a Gutzwiller projected BCS wavefunction as an approximate ground state. Recent work by Paramekanti et al has shown that this variational approach gives a semi-quantitative understanding of the doping dependences of a variety of experimental observables in the superconducting state of the cuprates. In this paper we revisit these issues using the 'renormalized mean field theory' of Zhang et al based on the Gutzwiller approximation in which the kinetic and superexchange energies are renormalized by different doping-dependent factors gt and gS respectively. We point out a number of consequences of this early mean field theory for experimental measurements which were not available when it was first explored, and observe that it is able to explain the existence of the pseudogap, properties of nodal quasiparticles and approximate spin–charge separation, the latter leading to large renormalizations of the Drude weight and superfluid density. We use the Lee–Wen theory of the phase transition as caused by thermal excitation of nodal quasiparticles, and also obtain a number of further experimental confirmations. Finally, we remark that superexchange, and not phonons, is responsible for d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates.
74.72.-h Cuprate superconductors (high-Tc and insulating parent compounds)
Issue 24 (23 June 2004)
Received 4 May 2004
Published 4 June 2004
P W Anderson et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 R755
Andrey V Chubukov et al 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 10017
Vadim N. Gamezo et al. 2005 ApJ 623 337
F. K. Röpke 2007 ApJ 668 1103
Jeffrey R. Forshaw et al JHEP10(2001)007
S. Perlmutter et al. 1999 ApJ 517 565
Tom Timusk and Bryan Statt 1999 Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 61
D. M. Townsley et al. 2007 ApJ 668 1118
Rob Legtenberg et al 1996 J. Micromech. Microeng. 6 320
D. Fargion et al. 1999 ApJ 517 725