Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 No 3 (29 January 2003) L95-L102
PII: S0953-8984(03)56286-5

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

A distortion of pseudotetramers coupled with the Jahn-Teller effect in the geometrically frustrated spinel system CdV2O4

Masashige Onoda and Junichi Hasegawa

Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan

Received 19 November 2002
Published 13 January 2003

Abstract. For the geometrically frustrated spinel system CdV2O4 with V3 +  (S = 1) that undergoes structural and magnetic transitions at Tc1 = 97 K, and may exhibit a transition to the antiferromagnetic state at Tc2 = 35 K, the crystal structures at 299 and 85 K have been determined with space groups Inline equation and I41/amd, respectively, by means of x-ray four-circle diffraction. At 85 K, the VO6 octahedron is distorted due to the Jahn-Teller effect with contraction of the V-O bond along the tetragonal c axis, and the network of V ions is achieved by the linkage of a distorted V4-tetrahedron block with two kinds of V-V bonds. On the basis of these structural properties, magnetic susceptibilities at temperatures between Tc1 and Tc2 are explained in terms of the tetragonally distorted pseudotetramer model.

1. Introduction

Geometrically frustrated spin systems have received a great deal of attention. A state where all of the antiferromagnetic bonds are satisfied at the same time is not allowed and the spin correlation is suppressed, since the elementary unit of the system is the triangle. These properties cause the temperature of the transition to a possible ordered phase to be reduced significantly. A structural phase transition to the lower symmetry sometimes takes place, because there is a gain in orbital and magnetic energies on lifting the degeneracy.

The normal spinel-type S = 1 insulator MV2O4, where M is a nonmagnetic divalent ion surrounded tetrahedrally (the so-called A-site) and the trivalent V has an octahedral coordination (the B-site), exhibits the frustration effect [1], since the network of V ions with antiferromagnetic interaction is achieved by the linkage of a regular tetrahedron block that has a V ion at each apex. The compounds with M  = Cd [2], Mg [3] and Zn [4] exhibit the cubic-tetragonal transition due to a Jahn-Teller effect and a jump of magnetic susceptibility at Tc1. In addition, at the lower Tc2, the temperature dependence of susceptibility shows a kink without a significant change of structure, suggesting the transition to the Néel state, in which spins are ordered antiferromagnetically in the chain of the tetragonal c plane [5, 6]. Here, Tc1 and Tc2 are 97 and 35 K for M  = Cd; 64.5 and 45 K for M  = Mg; and 52 and 44 K for M  = Zn. MgV2O4 indicates specific heat anomalies at both temperatures [3]. Using the high-temperature series expansion (HTSE) of up to the eighth order, the Curie constant C and the nearest-neighbour exchange coupling constant J for the cubic phase are estimated as follows: C = 0.98(2), 0.93(3) and 0.96(6) emu K (mol V) - 1, and J = 44(1), 92(7) and 92(7) K for M  = Cd, Mg and Zn, respectively [2].

On the basis of the exact solution of the magnetic susceptibility for a set of four interacting spins with Jtet for the spinel B sublattice or the pyrochlore lattice, a tetrahedral mean-field (TMF) model was proposed by García-Adeva and Huber [7]. In the MV2O4 system, this model was applicable at temperatures above Inline equation, where Jtet apparently corresponds to 2J. For CdV2O4 with Jtet< Tc1, all of the susceptibility data for the cubic phase are explained using that model, while for MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 with Jtet> Tc1, it is impossible to account for the data between Jtet and Tc1 [2]. In this sense, the present bound state was regarded as pseudotetramers. Recently, a modified theory, referred to as the generalized constant coupling (GCC) approximation, has been proposed [8]. It gives essentially exact results for the susceptibility and specific heat of the classical Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the spinel B sublattice. Mechanisms for lifting the frustration through a coupling between spin and lattice of freedom were also investigated [9, 10, 11]. Here, it has been postulated that the V4-tetrahedron block for the spinel B sublattice is distorted via a magnetic Jahn-Teller effect, leading to a transition from cubic to tetragonal symmetry and the development of bond order in the spin system with unequal spin correlations on different bonds of a tetrahedron. In particular, Tchernyshyov et al [10, 11] pointed out that the magnetoelastic couplings may exhibit spin-Peierls phases with bond order but no spin order, and found a range of several possible Néel states.

For the MV2O4 system, neither of the analyses for the crystal structure below Tc1 and the magnetic susceptibility between Tc1 and Tc2 have been performed. In this work, the structures of CdV2O4 at 299 and 85 K (below Tc1) are determined by means of x-ray four-circle diffraction to understand the essence of structural and magnetic anomalies at Tc1. Using the exchange coupling constant obtained in the previous work, magnetic susceptibilities above Tc1 are examined with the GCC for spin-singlet V4 tetramers that are not isolated but interactive to each other, called pseudotetramers. On the basis of the low-temperature structure, the tetragonally distorted pseudotetramer model is considered, and it is applied to the susceptibility data between Tc1 and Tc2. This analysis may reveal the anisotropy of the exchange coupling constant, which basically accounts for the Néel state for the isomorphous compounds MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 [5, 6], and may also set limits to the theoretical predictions described above.

2. Crystal structures

The polycrystalline specimens of CdV2O4 were first prepared by the solid-state reaction method described in [2]. By heating the mixtures of CdV2O4 and 0.1CdO sealed in evacuated silica tubes at 1273 K for one week, small single crystals were obtained, where excess CdO was necessary to compensate for the loss of Cd at high temperatures. The detailed x-ray powder diffraction patterns taken with Inline equation radiation and Inline equation scan method at 300 and 86 K indicated cubic and tetragonal symmetries, respectively, as in [2]. The magnetic susceptibility data for the collected crystals taken with the Faraday method were also in agreement with the previous results. The x-ray four-circle diffraction measurements were performed on a Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometer (custom-made) with graphite-monochromated radiation and the Inline equation scan method at temperatures between 85 and 300 K. The single crystals were mounted on a glass fibre, and their approximate dimensions were 0.07×0.07×0.07 mm and 0.04×0.04×0.04 mm for measurements at 299 and 85 K, respectively. The temperature dependence of the lattice constants on heating indicated the structural transition at Tc1 = 97 K. Below Tc1, both single- and powder-diffraction profile widths increased significantly with Inline equation, likely due to the microstrain effect. In order to understand this behaviour precisely, a further study is necessary.

Through the systematic absence of reflections, a statistical analysis of the intensity distribution and the successful solution and refinement of the structure, the crystal data were finally determined as listed in table 1. The space group at 85 K with lattice constant Inline equation and Inline equation, the subscript t(c) meaning tetragonal (cubic), was deduced from detailed considerations of the structure factor Fo map for (±±k l) with tetragonal cell constants close to cubic ones (Inline equation, Inline equation) on the basis of the criterion of Inline equation. A relatively large error in the lattice constant at 85 K may be due to the increase in diffraction profile width as described above. Various parameters for the structure refinements are also summarized. All of the calculations were performed with the teXsan [13] taking the atomic scattering factors from [14] and including anomalous dispersion effects given by [15]Note1 .

Table 1. The crystal data and parameters used for the structure refinements for CdV2O4 at 299 and 85 K. The residual factors R and Rw are defined as Inline equation and Inline equation, respectively, where Fo(c) is an observed (calculated) structure factor.
  T = 299 K T = 85 K
Crystal system Cubic Tetragonal
Space group Inline equation (No 227) I41/amd (No 141)
Z 8 4
(Å) 8.691(1) 6.170(2)
(Å) - 8.619(5)
V (Å3) 656.4(2) 328.1(2)
Radiation; Inline equation (deg) Mo KInline equation; 90 Mo KInline equation; 90
No. of unique reflections; Rint 175; 0.040 437; 0.080
No. of observations Inline equation 126 306
Corrections Lorentz polarization Lorentz polarization
  Absorption (0.8436-0.9976) Absorption (0.7893-1)
  Secondary extinction Secondary extinction
Solution; refinement Sapi 90 [12]; full-matrix Sapi 90; full-matrix
No. of variables 9 15
R; Rw 0.023; 0.025 0.030; 0.038

The atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic thermal parameters and anisotropic displacement parameters at 299 and 85 K are listed in table 2. Selected interatomic distances are listed in table 3. At 299 K, the crystal data and the oxygen u parameter with origin choice at centre Inline equation agree with the previous results [16], and all of the thermal parameters are in a normal range. At 85 K, Cd, V and O atoms are located at positions with Wyckoff letters 4b, 8c and 16h, respectively; the O atom alone has two variable position parameters. Figure 1(a) shows the crystal structure at 85 K projected on the tetragonal c plane. Here, the VO6 octahedron has four V-O bonds with 2.041 Å in the c plane and two bonds with 2.014 Å along the c axis. Therefore, the dxy-character for the ground-state wavefunction is expected to be enhanced slightly, which may be attributed to the Jahn-Teller effect. The average V-O bond is 2.032 Å, which is equal to the value at 299 K within a standard deviation and is normal for the V3 +  ion [17]. The network of V ions is expressed by the linkage of a distorted V4 tetrahedron block consist of four V-V bonds with 3.066 Å and two bonds with 3.085 Å, as shown in figure 1(b). The CdO4 tetrahedron has equal Cd-O bonds with 2.145 Å in agreement with the values at 299 K and with those expected from the ionic radius of Cd2 +  coordinated in a similar manner [17]. The crystals used at 299 and 85 K have the occupancy probabilities for Cd of 0.992(3) and 0.990(5), respectively, indicating that both of them are nearly stoichiometric. While the thermal parameters of Cd become smaller than those at 299 K due to the decrease in thermal vibrations, the values for V and O show inverse behaviours, since the Jahn-Teller effect should increase local distortions in their sites.

Figure 1

Figure 1. The crystal structure of CdV2O4 at 85 K: (a) the projection on the tetragonal c plane, where the numbers attached near the lines indicate V-V (roman) and V-O (italic) bond lengths, respectively, and those near the circles show the z coordinates; and (b) the network of V ions achieved by the linkage of a distorted tetrahedron block that has the V ion at each apex. The thick lines and broken lines denote the direct exchange couplings Inline equation and Inline equation, respectively.

Table 2. Atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic thermal parameters Beq (Å2) and anisotropic displacement parameters Uij of CdV2O4 at 299 and 85 K. Beq and Uij are defined by Inline equation and the parameters are defined in the thermal factor form Inline equation.
  T = 299 K T = 85 K
  Cd V O Cd V O
x Inline equation Inline equation 0.2672(2) Inline equation Inline equation Inline equation
y Inline equation Inline equation 0.2672 Inline equation 0  - 0.0349(4)
z Inline equation Inline equation 0.2672 Inline equation Inline equation 0.2677(3)
Beq 0.503(2) 0.392(2) 0.600(5) 0.450(4) 0.46(1) 0.63(3)
U11 0.0064(1) 0.0050(2) 0.0076(4) 0.0054(1) 0.0059(3) 0.0095(9)
U22 0.0064 0.0050 0.0076 0.0054 0.0055(3) 0.0064(8)
U33 0.0064 0.0050 0.0076 0.0063(2) 0.0063(3) 0.0079(9)
U12 0  - 0.0002(1)  - 0.0007(4) 0 0 0
U13 0  - 0.0002  - 0.0007 0 0 0
U23 0  - 0.0002  - 0.0007 0  - 0.0001(2) 0.0016(7)

Table 3. Selected interatomic distances (Å) and angles (deg) of CdV2O4 at 299 and 85 K, where the symmetry operators at 299 K are (1) x, y, z; (2) x, Inline equation, Inline equation; (3) Inline equation, y, Inline equation; (4) Inline equation, Inline equation, z; (5) Inline equation, Inline equation, 1 - z; (6) Inline equation, 1 - y, Inline equation; (7) 1 - x, Inline equation, Inline equation; (8) x, Inline equation, Inline equation; (9) Inline equation, y, Inline equation; (10) Inline equation, Inline equation, z; (11) x, Inline equation, Inline equation; (12) Inline equation, y, Inline equation; (13) Inline equation, Inline equation, z; and those at 85 K are (i) x, y, z; (ii) 1 - x,  - y, 1 - z; (iii) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (iv) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (v) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (vi) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (vii) x, Inline equation, z; (viii) x, Inline equation, z; (ix) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (x) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (xi) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation; (xii) Inline equation, Inline equation, Inline equation.
T = 299 K T = 85 K
V(1)-O(2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) 2.034(1) V(i)-O(i, ii) 2.014(3)
    V(i)-O(iii, iv, v, vi) 2.041(2)
V(1)-V(2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10) 3.0726(2) V(i)-V(vii, viii) 3.085(3)
    V(i)-V(v, vi, ix, x) 3.0662(7)
V(2)-O(1)-V(3, 4), 98.11(8) V(i)-O(i)-V(ix, x) 98.27(10)
V(3)-O(1)-V(4)   V(ix)-O(i)-V(x) 98.2(1)
Cd(1)-O(1, 11, 12, 13) 2.141(2) Cd(i)-O(i, vii, xi, xii) 2.145(3)

3. Magnetic properties

The magnetic susceptibilities Inline equation of MV2O4 with M  = Cd, Mg and Zn for the cubic phase consist of the d-spin term Inline equation and the temperature-independent one Inline equation from the Van Vleck and diamagnetic components. Using C and J for the d-spin and Inline equation determined with the HTSE, the reduced spin susceptibilities defined as Inline equation are shown as a function of J/T in figure 2 [2]. The dotted curve and the broken curve indicate results of the HTSE Inline equation and TMF Inline equation with Jtet = 2J, respectively, calculated following their expressions given in [2]. According to the GCC [8] without next-nearest-neighbour interaction, the spin susceptibility is given by

Equation (1)

where Inline equation. The full curve in figure 2 is drawn with Jtet = J (not 2J). This model accounts for the data in the cubic phase for CdV2O4 with J<Tc1 as well as those at temperatures above Inline equation for MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 with J>Tc1, taking account of an error in C (2-6%).

Figure 2

Figure 2. The reduced spin susceptibilities Inline equation as a function of J/T for MV2O4 with M  = Cd, Mg and Zn, where the full and broken curves indicate fits to the GCC and TMF models, respectively, and the dotted curves denote results calculated in terms of the HTSE.

The detailed low-temperature behaviours of the reduced spin susceptibilities as a function of T/J are plotted in figure 3. At first sight, the susceptibility maximum in CdV2O4 seems to be explained in terms of the GCC, but there exists a significant difference between the experimental and calculated results, as shown by the broken curve. This indicates that the exchange couplings for the V network change below Tc1, and the GCC for the regular pseudotetramers should be modified. To understand that difference, let us consider a cluster of four spins on the V4 unit distorted tetragonally as drawn in figures 1(a) and (b). The Hamiltonian of this cluster is

Equation (2)

where Inline equation and Inline equation are the exchange couplings for the thick lines and the broken lines in figures 1(a) and (b), respectively, and Si is the spin-1 operator. This Hamiltonian is diagonalized as listed in table 4. While the ground state is a singlet for any antiferromagnetic Inline equation and Inline equation, the energy level sequence depends on the ratio of Inline equation; for example, at Inline equation, the spin neutral excitation crosses with the spin triplet excitation. The spin susceptibility for this distorted pseudotetramer is given by

Equation (3)

where St is a value of the total spin of the cluster, and GSt and ESt are a degeneracy factor and the energy for St, respectively. The best fit to equation (1) with Inline equation provides Inline equation and Inline equation, when C and Inline equation are fixed at the HTSE values. An agreement between the experimental and calculated results is satisfactory, as indicated by the full curve in figure 3. The values of Inline equation and Inline equation also give a close fit, as shown by the dotted curve, but this is not the case, since the direct exchange couplings along the a and b directions are expected to be more effective due to an enhancement of the dxy character of the ground state. In other words, the V-V spacing dependence of exchange coupling below Tc1 should differ from that above Tc1, where the ground-state wavefunction may not depend significantly on the species of M. The present result explains qualitatively the antiferromagnetic order in the chain of the tetragonal c plane proposed for the isomorphous compounds MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 [5, 6]. It is also suggested that the spin-orbit interaction and the Van Vleck component do not change significantly at those temperatures of interest.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The reduced spin susceptibilities Inline equation as a function of T/J for MV2O4 with M  = Cd, Mg and Zn, where the full (dotted) curve indicates a fit to the GCC for the tetragonally distorted pseudotetramers with exchange couplings Inline equation (47.4) and Inline equation (29.3) K, and the broken curve corresponds to the full curve in figure 2.

Table 4. Eigenstates of a tetragonally distorted V4 tetrahedron cluster with exchange coupling Inline equation and Inline equation inside the cluster, where St is a value of the total spin of the cluster, and GSt and ESt are a degeneracy factor and the energy for St, respectively.
St GSt ESt   St GSt ESt
4 1 Inline equation   1 2 Inline equation
3 2 Inline equation     1 Inline equation
  1 Inline equation     2 Inline equation
2 1 Inline equation     1 Inline equation
  2 Inline equation   0 1 Inline equation
  2 Inline equation     1 Inline equation
  1 Inline equation     1 Inline equation

Between Tc1 and J, the behaviours of the reduced spin susceptibilities for MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 that are independent of the applied field and the measurement time [3] differ significantly from those calculated for the pseudotetramer with the GCC. It should be noted that Zn0.5Cd0.5V2O4 (one of the Zn-Cd solid solution system), in which the V3 + -V3 +  interaction is modified randomly to give bond disorder, exhibits a transition to spin-glass-like phases at certain temperature Tg without structural change [18], as in the case of the site-disordered system Mg (V1 - xAlx)2O4 [1, 3]. The temperature dependence of the susceptibility between Tc1 and J is roughly similar to that for Zn0.5Cd0.5V2O4 between Tg and J. Therefore, the deviation from the pseudotetramer model at temperatures below J is considered a common nature for the S = 1 spinel B sublattice which does not depend significantly on disordered effects.

Below Tc1, the frustration for interchains via Inline equation or excited dyz,zx orbital exists, since preliminary measurements of x-ray diffraction below Tc2 indicate the crystal symmetry to be tetragonal [18]. As introduced before, the mechanisms of transition to the Néel state have been discussed in [10, 11].

4. Conclusions

The crystal structures at 299 and 85 K of CdV2O4 that exhibit structural and magnetic transitions at Tc1 = 97 K and the antiferromagnetic transition at Tc2 = 35 K have been determined. The structure at 85 K is tetragonal and the dxy character of the ground state is enhanced due to the usual Jahn-Teller effect, leading to the anisotropy of the exchange coupling constant J. The magnetic susceptibilities for the cubic phase with J<Tc1 are explained in terms of the GCC with regular pseudotetramers using the same J as determined by the HTSE. The maximum phenomena for the susceptibilities between Tc1 and Tc2 (near to J) are also understood by the GCC for the distorted pseudotetramers with two kinds of exchange coupling. While this phase does not have a spin order, it is accompanied by significant modulation of the exchange interaction. It may be unnecessary to invoke the spin-Peierls phase postulated theoretically.

For the isomorphous compounds MgV2O4 and ZnV2O4 with J>Tc1, the GCC with regular pseudotetramers accounts for the susceptibility data at T>J. However, contrary to the behaviour expected from the GCC, the susceptibility for the cubic phase between J and Tc1 increases rapidly with decreasing temperature, which does not depend significantly on the disordered effect. Our scenario for CdV2O4 presented here seems to be basically effective for the isomorphous compounds, but in order to understand quantitatively the susceptibility anomalies at Tc1, detailed theories for T<J are necessary.

We thank Dr D L Huber for informing us of his recent papers regarding the GCC approximation with useful comments.

References

[1]
Mamiya H and Onoda M 1995 Solid State Commun. 95 217 
CrossRef
[2]
Nishiguchi N and Onoda M 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 L551 
IOPscience
[3]
Mamiya H, Onoda M, Furubayashi T, Tang J and Nakatani I 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 5289 
CrossRef
[4]
Ueda Y, Fujiwara N and Yasuoka H 1997 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 66 778 
CrossRef
[5]
Plumier R and Tardieu A 1963 C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 257 3858 
[6]
Niziol S 1973 Phys. Status Solidi a 18 K11 
CrossRef
[7]
García-Adeva A J and Huber D L 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4598 
CrossRefPubMed
[8]
García-Adeva A J and Huber D L 2002 Physica B 320 18 and references therein
[9]
Yamashita Y and Ueda K 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4960 
CrossRefPubMed
[10]
Tchernyshyov O, Moessner R and Sondhi  2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 067203 
CrossRefPubMed
[11]
Tchernyshyov O, Moessner R and Sondhi 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 064403 
[12]
Hai-Fu F 1990 SAPI90: Structure Analysis Programs with Intelligent Control (Tokyo: Rigaku Corporation) 
[13]
teXsan 1992 Crystal Structure Analysis Package (The Woodlands, TX: Molecular Structure Corporation) 
[14]
Cromer D T and Waber J T 1974 International Tables for X-Ray Crystallography ed J A Ibers and W C Hamilton (Birmingham: Kynoch) section 2
[15]
Creagh D C and McAuley W J 1992 International Tables for Crystallography vol C, ed A J C Wilson (Boston, MA: Kluwer) 
[16]
von Reuter B and Riedel E 1969 Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 369 306 
CrossRef
[17]
Shannon R D 1976 Acta Crystallogr. A 32 751 
CrossRef
[18]
Onoda M and Hasegawa J 2002 unpublished results


Note1

 Supplementary data files are available from the article's abstract page.



Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.