Robert G Jones et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 4059 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/16/301
Robert G Jones1,5, A S Y Chan1, M G Roper1, M P Skegg1, I G Shuttleworth1, C J Fisher2, G J Jackson2, J J Lee2, D P Woodruff2, N K Singh3 and B C C Cowie4
Show affiliationsAdatoms immersed in an x-ray standing wave at a surface betray their position within the wave by the way they absorb the x-rays; feebly when positioned at the nodes, strongly when positioned at the antinodes. The elemental (and chemical) identity of the adatoms are easily monitored using the binding energies of the photoelectron or Auger electron emissions, while the intensities of these emissions provide the information needed to determine the atomic positions relative to the crystalline substrate which formed the standing wave. By using normal incidence Bragg diffraction to generate the standing wave, the technique is applicable to the rather imperfect crystalline samples and standard manipulators used in most surface science studies. Examples of structural studies from a range of systems will be drawn from recent work carried out at the SRS in Daresbury to illustrate the strengths, and weaknesses, of this structural technique. Specifically, the structure of reactive intermediates (SiHx) formed by chemical reaction of silane on Cu(111); the structure of a physisorbed molecule (ClCH2CH2F) on Cu(111); an example of how chemically shifted Auger peaks may be useful for chemical shift XSW (chloroform on a chlorinated copper surface), and a system which presents many difficulties when studied by this technique, methyl thiolate on Au(111).
61.50.Lt Crystal binding; cohesive energy
82.80.Pv Electron spectroscopy (x-ray photoelectron (XPS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), etc.)
Condensed matter: electrical, magnetic and optical
Surfaces, interfaces and thin films
Issue 16 (29 April 2002)
Received 31 October 2001, in final form 14 December 2001
Published 11 April 2002
Robert G Jones et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 4059
M Bousquet-Mélou et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 9159
Sigbjørn Hervik 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4315
Michael Baake et al 1998 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 5755
K Tennakone et al 1998 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 31 1492
Alain Delgado and Augusto Gonzalez 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 4259
Koujin Takeda et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 3751
Z D Zhang et al 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 R217
Igor Kukavica 2009 Nonlinearity 22 2889
Simon Davis 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3395