Robert G Jones et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 4059 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/16/301
Robert G Jones1,5, A S Y Chan1, M G Roper1, M P Skegg1, I G Shuttleworth1, C J Fisher2, G J Jackson2, J J Lee2, D P Woodruff2, N K Singh3 and B C C Cowie4
Show affiliationsAdatoms immersed in an x-ray standing wave at a surface betray their position within the wave by the way they absorb the x-rays; feebly when positioned at the nodes, strongly when positioned at the antinodes. The elemental (and chemical) identity of the adatoms are easily monitored using the binding energies of the photoelectron or Auger electron emissions, while the intensities of these emissions provide the information needed to determine the atomic positions relative to the crystalline substrate which formed the standing wave. By using normal incidence Bragg diffraction to generate the standing wave, the technique is applicable to the rather imperfect crystalline samples and standard manipulators used in most surface science studies. Examples of structural studies from a range of systems will be drawn from recent work carried out at the SRS in Daresbury to illustrate the strengths, and weaknesses, of this structural technique. Specifically, the structure of reactive intermediates (SiHx) formed by chemical reaction of silane on Cu(111); the structure of a physisorbed molecule (ClCH2CH2F) on Cu(111); an example of how chemically shifted Auger peaks may be useful for chemical shift XSW (chloroform on a chlorinated copper surface), and a system which presents many difficulties when studied by this technique, methyl thiolate on Au(111).
61.50.Lt Crystal binding; cohesive energy
82.80.Pv Electron spectroscopy (x-ray photoelectron (XPS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), etc.)
Condensed matter: electrical, magnetic and optical
Surfaces, interfaces and thin films
Issue 16 (29 April 2002)
Received 31 October 2001, in final form 14 December 2001
Published 11 April 2002
Robert G Jones et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 4059
S. Komossa and David Merritt 2008 ApJ 689 L89
R. Ferrer i Cancho and D. Lusseau 2006 Europhys. Lett. 74 1095
Michael J W Hall 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 7799
Shahar Hod 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 L97
D B Fairlie 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 5375
Yuri I. Izotov and Trinh X. Thuan 2004 ApJ 602 200
S Froyen and M L Cohen 1986 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19 2623
Marc Lachièze-Rey 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 3531
M Rooman and Ph Spindel 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 2117