Rakesh Choubisa and K K Sud 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 208002 doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/20/208002
Rakesh Choubisa1 and K K Sud2
Show affiliationsIn this reply, we clarify our theoretical model used (the so-called 2CG model) in our recent paper (Choubisa and Sud 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 035202) and address the queries and comments raised by Dal Cappello and Ancarani.
34.80.Dp Atomic excitation and ionization
31.15.-p Calculations and mathematical techniques in atomic and molecular physics
Issue 20 (28 October 2008)
Received 13 August 2008
Published 1 October 2008
Rakesh Choubisa and K K Sud 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 208002
Changhao Liang et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 485202
G Lanzara and F-K Chang 2009 Smart Mater. Struct. 18 125001
Davide Gaiotto and Alessandro Tomasiello 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 465205
M Meyyappan 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 213001
Herschel Rabitz 2009 New J. Phys. 11 105030
J Mark Heinzle and Hans Ringström 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 145001
Fabrizio Colombo 2009 Inverse Problems 25 105007
J C Phillips 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 455213
Jian Ye et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012105