A D Whiteford et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 3179 doi:10.1088/0953-4075/34/15/320
A D Whiteford, N R Badnell, C P Ballance, M G O'Mullane, H P Summers and A L Thomas
Show affiliationsElectron-impact excitation collision strengths for transitions between all singly excited levels up to the n = 4 shell of helium-like argon and the n = 4 and 5 shells of helium-like iron have been calculated using a radiation-damped R-matrix approach. The theoretical collision strengths have been examined and associated with their infinite-energy limit values to allow the preparation of Maxwell-averaged effective collision strengths. These are conservatively considered to be accurate to within 20% at all temperatures, 3×105-3×108 K for Ar16+ and 106-109 K for Fe24+. They have been compared with the results of previous studies, where possible, and we find a broad accord.
The corresponding rate coefficients are required for use in the calculation of derived, collisional-radiative, effective emission coefficients for helium-like lines for diagnostic application to fusion and astrophysical plasmas. The uncertainties in the fundamental collision data have been used to provide a critical assessment of the expected resultant uncertainties in such derived data, including redistributive and cascade collisional-radiative effects. The consequential uncertainties in the parts of the effective emission coefficients driven by excitation from the ground levels for the key w, x, y and z lines vary between 5% and 10%. Our results remove an uncertainty in the reaction rates of a key class of atomic processes governing the spectral emission of helium-like ions in plasmas.
95.30.Qd Magnetohydrodynamics and plasmas
32.50.+d Fluorescence, phosphorescence (including quenching)
52.20.Hv Atomic, molecular, ion, and heavy-particle collisions
52.70.-m Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation
Issue 15 (14 August 2001)
Received 19 April 2001, in final form 12 June 2001
Published 23 July 2001
A D Whiteford et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 3179
Du Yu-Lei 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117102
Y Gabellini and J -L Meunier 1992 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25 3683
G.P. Maddison et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 125004
Klaus Behrndt and Dietmar Klemm 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 4107
J Beckers et al 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 2791
V P Konchakovski et al 2009 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36 125106
Ian Russell 1990 Phys. Educ. 25 258
Ye Gu and Norihisa Miki 2007 J. Micromech. Microeng. 17 2308
K Aichele et al 1998 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 31 2369