John Hunt et al 2009 J. Radiol. Prot. 29 23 doi:10.1088/0952-4746/29/1/001
John Hunt1, Trevor Bailey1 and Allan Reese2
Show affiliationsTritium in the UK environment causes low radiation doses to the public, but uncertainty exists in the dose coefficient for the organically bound component of tritium (OBT). This can affect the assessment of effective doses to representative persons. Contributing to that uncertainty is poor knowledge of the body retention time of OBT and how this varies for different OBT compounds in food. This study was undertaken to measure the retention time of tritium by volunteers after eating sole from Cardiff Bay, which may contain OBT from discharges from the GE Healthcare Ltd plant. Five volunteers provided samples of excreta over periods up to 150 days after intake. The results, which are presented in raw form to allow independent analysis, suggest retention of total tritium with body half-times ranging from 4 to 11 days, with no evidence (subject to experimental noise) of a significant contribution due to retention with a longer half-time. This range covers the half-time of 10 days used by the ICRP for tritiated water. The short timescale could be due to rapid hydrolysis in body tissues of the particular form of OBT used in this study. Implications for the dose coefficient for OBT are that the use of the ICRP value of 4.2 × 10−11 Sv Bq−1 may be cautious in this specific situation. These observations on dose coefficients are separate from any implications of recent discussion on whether the tritium radiation weighting factor should be increased from 1 to 2.
Issue 1 (March 2009)
Received 1 October 2008, accepted for publication 8 December 2008, in final form 26 November 2008
Published 18 February 2009
John Hunt et al 2009 J. Radiol. Prot. 29 23
S Williams et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 125 012038
M V Berry et al 2005 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 7 685
W. M. Holmes et al 2004 Europhys. Lett. 66 464
Weimin Kuang et al 2005 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 7 525
Mariano Bossi et al 2006 New J. Phys. 8 275
Francesco Nesi and Michele Modugno 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 S101
R G Andrzejak et al 2006 New J. Phys. 8 6
D C Schram et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 192 012012
Jeffrey A. Newman 2008 ApJ 684 88