J P Candeias et al 2007 J. Radiol. Prot. 27 59 doi:10.1088/0952-4746/27/1/003
J P Candeias1, J J S Estrada1, A S Pinho2, R L D'Ávila2 and A T Ramalho2,3
Show affiliationsIndustrial radiography is the most frequent method of non-destructive testing (NDT) used by Brazilian industrial facilities for investigating the material integrity of a test object. In Brazil, industrial radiography employs around 220 x-ray and 290 gamma radiography machines. About 90% of the latter uses iridium (192Ir) sources. The large majority of 192Ir projectors in operation in Brazil have been in continuous usage for more than 25 years, which means that they are old and worn-out. Usually the majority of accidents concerning gamma radiography occur during the return of the source into the exposure container. Poor maintenance or imperfections of the internal channel of the exposure container can lead to accidental source exposure. In the present work the internal tube of 65 gamma machines from nine Brazilian companies that render gamma radiography services were analysed using an industrial videoscope. The internal images from the projectors were compared with the internal image of an apparatus that had never been used, i.e. has never received a radioactive source. From the 65 machines evaluated, nine showed irregularities of the internal tube. It was also observed that each company follows a different methodology for the maintenance and lubrication of the exposure containers and drive cables.
81.70.Ex Nondestructive testing: electromagnetic testing, eddy-current testing
Issue 1 (March 2007)
Received 24 July 2006, accepted for publication 29 August 2006
Published 6 March 2007
J P Candeias et al 2007 J. Radiol. Prot. 27 59
Francis Collino et al 2003 Inverse Problems 19 1279
H Gong et al 2004 Metrologia 41 161
C Wakabayashi et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 191 012006
Yasusada Nambu and Atsushi Taruya 1996 Class. Quantum Grav. 13 705
I L Cooper et al 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20 2005
Matthew A Holden et al 2003 J. Micromech. Microeng. 13 412
C Vadla et al 1992 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 25 1337
Kirk W Gossage et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1563
2007 Metrologia 44 537