Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Comparison of collective Thomson scattering signals due to fast ions in ITER scenarios with fusion and auxiliary heating

M Salewski1, O Asunta2, L-G Eriksson3, H Bindslev1, V Hynönen2, S B Korsholm1, T Kurki-Suonio2, F Leipold1, F Meo1, P K Michelsen1, S K Nielsen1 and J Roenby1

Show affiliations


Auxiliary heating such as neutral beam injection (NBI) and ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) will accelerate ions in ITER up to energies in the MeV range, i.e. energies which are also typical for alpha particles. Fast ions of any of these populations will elevate the collective Thomson scattering (CTS) signal for the proposed CTS diagnostic in ITER. It is of interest to determine the contributions of these fast ion populations to the CTS signal for large Doppler shifts of the scattered radiation since conclusions can mostly be drawn for the dominant contributor. In this study, distribution functions of fast ions generated by NBI and ICRH are calculated for a steady-state ITER burning plasma equilibrium with the ASCOT and PION codes, respectively. The parameters for the auxiliary heating systems correspond to the design currently foreseen for ITER. The geometry of the CTS system for ITER is chosen such that near perpendicular and near parallel velocity components are resolved. In the investigated ICRH scenario, waves at 50 MHz resonate with tritium at the second harmonic off-axis on the low field side. Effects of a minority heating scheme with 3He are also considered. CTS scattering functions for fast deuterons, fast tritons, fast 3He and the fusion born alphas are presented, revealing that fusion alphas dominate the measurable signal by an order of magnitude or more in the Doppler shift frequency ranges typical for fast ions. Hence the observable CTS signal can mostly be attributed to the alpha population in these frequency ranges. The exceptions are limited regions in space with some non-negligible signal due to beam ions or fast 3He which give rise to about 30% and 10–20% of the CTS signal, respectively. In turn, the dominance of the alpha contribution implies that the effects of other fast ion contributions will be difficult to observe by CTS.


PACS

52.55.Fa Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks

52.50.Qt Plasma heating by radio-frequency fields; ICR, ICP, helicons

52.55.Pi Fusion products effects (e.g., alpha-particles, etc.), fast particle effects

52.50.Gj Plasma heating by particle beams

52.70.-m Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Plasma physics

Dates

Issue 3 (March 2009)

Received 11 August 2008, in final form 20 November 2008

Published 31 December 2008



Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Dust in magnetic fusion devices
  2. Controlling sawtooth oscillations in tokamak plasmas
  3. Control of non-axisymmetric toroidal plasmas
More

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.