C J Ham et al 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 115010 doi:10.1088/0741-3335/51/11/115010
C J Ham, C G Gimblett and R J Hastie
Show affiliationsFusion power from a tokamak increases as β2 (β is the ratio of the plasma and magnetic field pressures) and so the mitigation of instabilities such as the resistive wall mode (RWM), that can prevent high β operation, is important. Stabilization of the RWM with a plasma rotation frequency of below 1% ΩA, where ΩA is the Alfvénic rotation frequency, has been observed in a number of tokamaks. An analytical model for this stabilization, in a cylindrical plasma with a resonant layer, is discussed here. The layer theory of Porcelli (1987 Phys. Fluids 30 1734) is used to provide a model of the physics within the resonant layer. A dispersion relation connecting the plasma equilibrium to the layer physics in a rotating plasma is developed. Two mechanisms for RWM stabilization are investigated. The first includes viscosity in the resonant layer. The second assumes that stabilization occurs in the transition from one layer response to another. These models indicate a priori that there is a large parameter space where stabilization of the RWM by rotation is possible. However, if experimentally realistic timescales and rotation, namely O(1)% ΩA, are considered then only a small window for stabilization exists. It is therefore unlikely that these mechanisms explain the observed experimental RWM stabilization. It seems that other physical effects, such as toroidal mode coupling in the outer equilibrium or pressure gradients in a toroidal geometry, will be responsible for stabilization.
52.55.Fa Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks
52.30.Cv Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics)
52.40.Hf Plasma-material interactions; boundary layer effects
Issue 11 (November 2009)
Received 2 June 2009, in final form 17 September 2009
Published 28 October 2009
C J Ham et al 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 115010
P Oliver and A Hibbert 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 2847
Fu Hui-Shan et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 119402
E C Goldberg and M C G Passeggi 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 7637
J C Jaeger and E R Hoskins 1966 Br. J. Appl. Phys. 17 685
via analytical transfer matrix method
Artit Hutem and Chanun Sricheewin 2008 Eur. J. Phys. 29 577
J F Rabek et al 1986 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 19 364
G Zanchi et al 1980 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13 1589
Astrid Franz 2000 Nonlinearity 13 1425
Pedro Gómez Venegas and Ramón Mendoza 2006 Inverse Problems 22 1575