D C Speirs et al 2008 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50 074011 doi:10.1088/0741-3335/50/7/074011
D C Speirs1, S L McConville1, K M Gillespie1, K Ronald1, A D R Phelps1, A W Cross1, R Bingham1,3, C W Robertson1, C G Whyte1, I Vorgul2, R A Cairns2 and B J Kellett3
Show affiliationsResults are presented from a numerical investigation of radiation emission from an electron beam with a horseshoe-shaped velocity distribution. This process is relevant to the phenomenon of auroral kilometric radiation (AKR) which occurs in the polar regions of the Earth's magnetosphere. In these regions of the auroral zone, particles accelerated into the increasing magnetic field of the Earth's dipole develop a horseshoe-shaped velocity distribution through conservation of magnetic moment. It has been shown theoretically that this distribution is unstable to a cyclotron maser instability. A 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) code model was constructed to simulate a scaled laboratory experiment in which an electron beam subject to significant magnetic compression may be studied and brought into resonance with TE modes of an interaction waveguide. Results were obtained for electron beam energies of 75–85 keV, magnetic compression factors of up to 30 and electron cyclotron frequencies of 4.42 and 11.7 GHz. At 11.7 GHz, beam–wave coupling was observed with the TE03 mode and an RF output power of 20 kW was obtained corresponding to an RF conversion efficiency of 1.3%. At 4.42 GHz, excitation of the TE01 mode was observed with an RF output power of 35 kW for a cyclotron-wave detuning of 2%. This corresponds to an RF conversion efficiency of 2.6%. In both cases PiC particle velocity distributions show the clear formation of a horseshoe-shaped velocity distribution and subsequent action of a cyclotron maser instability. The RF conversion efficiencies obtained are also comparable with estimates for the AKR generation efficiency.
94.30.Aa Auroral phenomena in magnetospher
94.30.Bg Magnetic coordinate systems
94.30.cq MHD waves, plasma waves, and instabilities
Issue 7 (July 2008)
Received 31 October 2007, in final form 31 January 2008
Published 3 June 2008
D C Speirs et al 2008 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50 074011
S L McConville et al 2008 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50 074010
L Gargaté et al 2008 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50 074017
Juhua Chen and Yongjiu Wang 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3897
Pei-I Wang et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 218
P K Shukla et al 2004 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46 B349
Giulia Galli and Francois Gygi 2005 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 16 220
H Casini 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 2509
Luis J Garay and Guillermo A Mena Marugán 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 L115
J E Pask and P A Sterne 2005 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13 R71