G P Maddison et al 2006 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48 71 doi:10.1088/0741-3335/48/1/007
G P Maddison, A Turner, S J Fielding and S You
Show affiliationsA zero-dimensional, or global, description of fuelling and exhaust processes is introduced to help assess techniques for reducing the density of gas, and its impact on plasma-density control, within the large vacuum tank of the MAST spherical tokamak. Model calculations for sample MAST discharges reveal their typical ion confinement time (≤50 ms) and contrasting fuelling efficiencies for outboard or inboard puffing. In steady state, the ratio between tank molecular and plasma densities is fixed irrespective of any sinks when gas is puffed from the vessel wall, but for fuelling at the plasma edge with moderate ionization efficiency, unsaturated boronization of MAST surfaces can yield ≈5 × lower gas density and excellent plasma pump-out. A 'two-chamber' adaptation of the global model with zones connected by variable conductances is also defined to address a possible in-vessel, cryopumped divertor. Exact limiting solutions reveal that for a constant plasma, steady-state gas density in the main torus generally rises for stronger divertor pumping when puffing into the tank, while it only decreases with pumping for fuelling at non-zero efficiency directly into the divertor plasma or 100% efficiency at any location. Full 'two-chamber' calculations for MAST indicate that the tank gas would be lowered principally through high divertor closure and fuelling efficiency, which combined with unsaturated boronization lead to > 10 × less steady gas density. Divertor cryopumping would be useful chiefly for plasma density control in long pulses or sustained exhaust in the absence of wall sinks. Global modelling offers a way similarly to examine fuelling behaviour in any tokamak device.
52.55.Fa Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks
52.40.Hf Plasma-material interactions; boundary layer effects
Issue 1 (January 2006)
Received 11 April 2005, in final form 18 October 2005
Published 9 December 2005
G P Maddison et al 2006 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48 71
S Bandyopadhyay et al 2002 Smart Mater. Struct. 11 761
N Dimakis et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012198
U M O Ivowi 1984 Phys. Educ. 19 279
Amol S Dighe 2001 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 27 1061
Yuan Gao et al 2008 Metrologia 45 S34
G J Sinclair et al 1995 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28 1785
Yong Yan 2003 Meas. Sci. Technol. 14
Larry L Smalley and J P Krisch 1994 Class. Quantum Grav. 11 2375
Seçkin Kürkçüoglu and Olaf Lechtenfeld JHEP09(2007)020