Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

Samuel Colin1, Thomas Durt2 and Roderich Tumulka3

Show affiliations


The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G. We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.


PACS

03.65.-w Quantum mechanics

MSC

81Q10 Selfadjoint operator theory in quantum theory, including spectral analysis

Subjects

Quantum information and quantum mechanics

Dates

Issue 50 (15 December 2006)

Received 6 September 2006, in final form 7 November 2006

Published 30 November 2006



  1. On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

    Samuel Colin et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 15403

  2. An algebraic geometric approach to integrable maps of the plane

    Danesh Jogia et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 1133

  3. Quasi-periodic Green's functions of the Helmholtz and Laplace equations

    Alexander Moroz 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 11247

  4. Applications of field-theoretic renormalization group methods to reaction–diffusion problems

    Uwe C Täuber et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 R79

  5. Bell-type quantum field theories

    Detlef Dürr et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 R1

  6. Generating function for Hermite–Gaussian modes propagating through first-order optical systems

    Martin J Bastiaans and Tatiana Alieva 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L73

  7. Maslov indices and monodromy

    H R Dullin et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L443

  8. O(N) symmetries, sum rules for generalized Hermite polynomials and squeezed states

    Jamil Daboul and Salomon S Mizrahi 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 427

  9. Quantum–classical correspondence via a deformed kinetic operator

    R A Mosna et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 3869

  10. Quantum-to-classical correspondence in open chaotic systems

    Henning Schomerus and Philippe Jacquod 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 10663

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.