Samuel Colin et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 15403 doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/50/008
Samuel Colin1, Thomas Durt2 and Roderich Tumulka3
Show affiliationsThe meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G. We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.
81Q10 Selfadjoint operator theory in quantum theory, including spectral analysis
Issue 50 (15 December 2006)
Received 6 September 2006, in final form 7 November 2006
Published 30 November 2006
Samuel Colin et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 15403
Danesh Jogia et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 1133
Alexander Moroz 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 11247
Uwe C Täuber et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 R79
Detlef Dürr et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 R1
Martin J Bastiaans and Tatiana Alieva 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L73
H R Dullin et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L443
Jamil Daboul and Salomon S Mizrahi 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 427
R A Mosna et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 3869
Henning Schomerus and Philippe Jacquod 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 10663