Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

Samuel Colin1, Thomas Durt2 and Roderich Tumulka3

Show affiliations


The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G. We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.


PACS

03.65.-w Quantum mechanics

MSC

81Q10 Selfadjoint operator theory in quantum theory, including spectral analysis

Subjects

Quantum information and quantum mechanics

Dates

Issue 50 (15 December 2006)

Received 6 September 2006, in final form 7 November 2006

Published 30 November 2006



  1. On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

    Samuel Colin et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 15403

  2. The double-Kerr solution

    W B Bonnor and B R Steadman 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 2723

  3. Multipole expansions in four-dimensional hyperspherical harmonics

    A V Meremianin 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 3099

  4. Ξ0(1530) production in heavy-ion collisions and its implications for Δttherm-chem

    R Witt (for the STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 S921

  5. The Near-Infrared Size-Luminosity Relations for Herbig Ae/Be Disks

    J. D. Monnier et al. 2005 ApJ 624 832

  6. Thermodynamics of a tiling model

    Luca Leuzzi and Giorgio Parisi 2000 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 4215

  7. Dielectronic recombination in He-like titanium ions

    B E O'Rourke et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 2343

  8. Quantum-based atomistic simulation of materials properties in transition metals

    John A Moriarty et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2825

  9. Analytic representation of the square-root operator

    Tepper L Gill and W W Zachary 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 2479

  10. The measurement of anomalous neutron inelastic cross-sections at electronvolt energy transfers

    J Mayers and T Abdul-Redah 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 4811

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.