Ryutaroh Matsumoto 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8113 doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/29/316
Ryutaroh Matsumoto
Show affiliationsWe show how to convert a quantum stabilizer code to a one- or two-way entanglement distillation protocol. The proposed conversion method is a generalization of those of Shor–Preskill and Nielsen–Chuang. The recurrence protocol and the quantum privacy amplification protocol are equivalent to the protocols converted from [[2, 1]] stabilizer codes. We also give an example of a two-way protocol converted from a stabilizer better than the recurrence protocol and the quantum privacy amplification protocol. The distillable entanglement by the class of one-way protocols converted from stabilizer codes for a certain class of states is equal to or greater than the achievable rate of stabilizer codes over the channel corresponding to the distilled state, and they can distill asymptotically more entanglement from a very noisy Werner state than the hashing protocol.
03.67.Mn Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations
81P68 Quantum computation and quantum cryptography (See also 68Q05, 94A60)
Issue 29 (25 July 2003)
Received 4 April 2003
Published 8 July 2003
Ryutaroh Matsumoto 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8113
Paul K Townsend and Mattias N R Wohlfarth 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5375
A N F Aleixo et al 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 9063
I S Heng et al 1999 Class. Quantum Grav. 16 3439
D H Bailey et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 12271
Jonathan T. Barron et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 414
J. J. Fortney et al. 2006 ApJ 652 746
Osvaldo M Moreschi 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5409
P Albers et al 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 4451
Ruba T Borno et al 2006 J. Micromech. Microeng. 16 2375