Yan V Fyodorov and H-J Sommers 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 3303 doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/12/326
Yan V Fyodorov1 and H-J Sommers2
Show affiliationsThe paper discusses recent progress in understanding statistical properties of eigenvalues of (weakly) non-Hermitian and non-unitary random matrices. The first type of ensembles is of the form
=
− i
, with
being a large random N × N Hermitian matrix with independent entries 'deformed' by a certain anti-Hermitian N × N matrix i
satisfying in the limit of large dimension N the condition Tr
2
N Tr
2. Here
can be either a random or just a fixed given Hermitian matrix. Ensembles of such a type with
≥ 0 emerge naturally when describing quantum scattering in systems with chaotic dynamics and serve to describe resonance statistics. Related models are used to mimic complex spectra of the Dirac operator with chemical potential in the context of quantum chromodynamics.
Ensembles of the second type, arising naturally in scattering theory of discrete-time systems, are formed by N × N matrices
with complex entries such that
†
=
−
. For
= 0 this coincides with the circular unitary ensemble, and 0 ≤
≤
describes deviation from unitarity. Our result amounts to answering statistically the following old question: given the singular values of a matrix
describe the locus of its eigenvalues.
We systematically show that the obtained expressions for the correlation functions of complex eigenvalues describe a non-trivial crossover from Wigner–Dyson statistics of real/unimodular eigenvalues typical of Hermitian/unitary matrices to Ginibre statistics in the complex plane typical of ensembles with strong non-Hermiticity:
Tr
2
Tr
2
when N → ∞. Finally, we discuss (scarce) results available on eigenvector statistics for weakly non-Hermitian random matrices.
05.45.Mt Quantum chaos; semiclassical methods
15A57 Other types of matrices (Hermitian, skew-Hermitian, etc.)
Issue 12 (28 March 2003)
Received 30 July 2002, in final form 25 November 2002
Published 12 March 2003
Yan V Fyodorov and H-J Sommers 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 3303
Paul Bryant 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 2859
A A Gippius et al 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 9167
James E Carlisle et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 12451
Iwan Jensen 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L769
T D Frank 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 3561
Nicholas J Bird et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 1371
Martin Sieber 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 L613
M M El-Zaidia et al 1981 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 14 2275
Beau Webber and John Dore 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 S5449