Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Flow equations for Hamiltonians: contrasting different approaches by using a numerically solvable model

T Stauber and A Mielke

Show affiliations


To contrast different generators for flow equations for Hamiltonians and to discuss the dependence of physical quantities on unitarily equivalent, but effectively different, initial Hamiltonians, a numerically solvable model is considered which is structurally similar to impurity models. By this we discuss the question of optimization for the first time. A general truncation scheme is established that produces good results for the Hamiltonian flow as well as for the operator flow. Nevertheless, it is also pointed out that a systematic and feasible scheme for the operator flow on the operator level is missing. For this, an explicit analysis of the operator flow is given for the first time. We observe that truncation of the series of the observable flow after the linear or bilinear terms does not yield satisfactory results for the entire parameter regime as—especially close to resonances—even high orders of the exact series expansion carry considerable weight.


PACS

03.65.Yz Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods

02.60.Cb Numerical simulation; solution of equations

02.60.Pn Numerical optimization

02.30.Tb Operator theory

MSC

65K10 Optimization and variational techniques (See also 49Mxx, 93B40)

65P10 Hamiltonian systems including symplectic integrators

81U15 Exactly and quasi-solvable systems

Subjects

Mathematical physics

Computational physics

Quantum information and quantum mechanics

Dates

Issue 11 (21 March 2003)

Received 29 October 2002, in final form 29 January 2003

Published 6 March 2003



  1. Flow equations for Hamiltonians: contrasting different approaches by using a numerically solvable model

    T Stauber and A Mielke 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 2707

  2. Determination of the energy-momentum densities of aluminium by electron momentum spectroscopy

    M Vos et al 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 3645

  3. Droplet minimizers for the Gates–Lebowitz–Penrose free energy functional

    E A Carlen et al 2009 Nonlinearity 22 2919

  4. Estimating intratidal nonlinearity of respiratory system mechanics: a model study using the enhanced gliding-SLICE method

    Stefan Schumann et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 1341

  5. Algebraic Bethe ansatz method for the exact calculation of energy spectra and form factors: applications to models of Bose–Einstein condensates and metallic nanograins

    Jon Links et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 R63

  6. Three-level coupled systems and parasupersymmetric shape invariance

    A N F Aleixo and A B Balantekin 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 6433

  7. On q-analogues of the quantum harmonic oscillator and the quantum group SU(2)q

    A J Macfarlane 1989 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22 4581

  8. Understanding dielectrophoretic trapping of neuronal cells: modelling electric field, electrode-liquid interface and fluid flow

    T Heida et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 1592

  9. Monte Carlo simulation of the neutron spectral fluence and dose equivalent for use in shielding a proton therapy vault

    Yuanshui Zheng et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6943

  10. Double shake-off model for the triple photoionization of beryllium

    A S Kheifets and Igor Bray 2003 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36 L211

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.