R T Bühler et al 2009 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 24 115017 doi:10.1088/0268-1242/24/11/115017
R T Bühler1, R Giacomini1,2, M A Pavanello1,2 and J A Martino2
Show affiliationsThe trapezium is often a better approximation for the FinFET cross-section shape, rather than the design-intended rectangle. The frequent width variations along the vertical direction, caused by the etching process that is used for fin definition, may imply in inclined sidewalls and the inclination angles can vary in a significant range. These geometric variations may cause some important changes in the device electrical characteristics. This work analyzes the influence of the FinFET sidewall inclination angle on some relevant parameters for analog design, such as threshold voltage, output conductance, transconductance, intrinsic voltage gain (AV), gate capacitance and unit-gain frequency, through 3D numeric simulation. The intrinsic gain is affected by alterations in transconductance and output conductance. The results show that both parameters depend on the shape, but in different ways. Transconductance depends mainly on the sidewall inclination angle and the fixed average fin width, whereas the output conductance depends mainly on the average fin width and is weakly dependent on the sidewall inclination angle. The simulation results also show that higher voltage gains are obtained for smaller average fin widths with inclination angles that correspond to inverted trapeziums, i.e. for shapes where the channel width is larger at the top than at the transistor base because of the higher attained transconductance. When the channel top is thinner than the base, the transconductance degradation affects the intrinsic voltage gain. The total gate capacitances also present behavior dependent on the sidewall angle, with higher values for inverted trapezium shapes and, as a consequence, lower unit-gain frequencies.
02.60.Cb Numerical simulation; solution of equations
85.30.De Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling
Issue 11 (November 2009)
Received 7 May 2009, in final form 27 August 2009
Published 20 October 2009
R T Bühler et al 2009 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 24 115017
Zhi-Qing Zhang 2009 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36 125004
Chantal Badre et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 365705
Christian Maes and Karel Netocný 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 3053
L H Andersen et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 R57
C Neves et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 9303
David Chappell and John Scalo 2001 ApJ 551 712
A Yahya and C D Manning 2004 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 1467
Michael E. Ressler and Mary Barsony 2003 ApJ 584 832
G. Qin 2007 ApJ 656 217