Ilia Musco et al 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 235001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/23/235001
Ilia Musco1,2, John C Miller2,3 and Alexander G Polnarev4
Show affiliationsFollowing on after two previous papers discussing the formation of primordial black holes in the early universe, we present here results from an in-depth investigation of the extent to which primordial black hole formation in the radiative era can be considered as an example of the critical collapse phenomenon. We focus on initial supra-horizon-scale perturbations of a type which could have come from inflation, with only a growing component and no decaying component. In order to study perturbations with amplitudes extremely close to the supposed critical limit, we have modified our previous computer code with the introduction of an adaptive mesh refinement scheme. This has allowed us to follow black hole formation from perturbations whose amplitudes are up to eight orders of magnitude closer to the threshold than we could do before. We find that scaling-law behaviour continues down to the smallest black hole masses that we are able to follow and we see no evidence of shock production such as has been reported in some previous studies and which led there to a breaking of the scaling-law behaviour at small black hole masses. We attribute this difference to the different initial conditions used. In addition to the scaling law, we also present other features of the results which are characteristic of critical collapse in this context.
Issue 23 (7 December 2009)
Received 8 November 2008, in final form 8 September 2009
Published 30 October 2009
Ilia Musco et al 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 235001
R Evans and J R Henderson 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 474220
2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 220402
Tran Le et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 116801
Debdutta Lahiri et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012099
Lan Hai-Ping and Zhang Shuang 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117303
Mohammad H Maneshian et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 495703
Y Z Chen et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 442001
R G Novikov 2009 Inverse Problems 25 115010
S Boukraa et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 455202