F Beauville et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 045001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045001
F Beauville1, M-A Bizouard2, L Blackburn3, L Bosi4, L Brocco5, D A Brown6,7, D Buskulic1, F Cavalier2, S Chatterji6, N Christensen8,9, A-C Clapson2, S Fairhurst7, D Grosjean1, G Guidi10, P Hello2, S Heng11, M Hewitson11, E Katsavounidis3, S Klimenko12, M Knight8, A Lazzarini6, N Leroy2, F Marion1, J Markowitz3, C Melachrinos3, B Mours1, F Ricci5, A Viceré10, I Yakushin13 and M Zanolin3 (The joint LIGO/Virgo working group)
Show affiliationsPresented in this paper is a detailed and direct comparison of the detection pipelines used by LIGO and Virgo in their attempt to observe gravitational waves from binary neutron star systems. In order to test the search programs, numerous inspiral signals were added to 24 h of simulated detector data. The efficiencies of the different pipelines were tested, and found to be very similar. Parameter estimation routines were also tested. We demonstrate that there are definite benefits if LIGO and Virgo conduct a joint coincident analysis; these advantages include increased detection efficiency and information on source sky location.
04.80.Nn Gravitational wave detectors and experiments
Issue 4 (21 February 2008)
Received 20 June 2007, in final form 28 November 2007
Published 31 January 2008
F Beauville et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 045001
J D Norton 1993 Rep. Prog. Phys. 56 791
Kesong Liu et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 165604
Pilar Montañés-Rodríguez et al. 2007 The Astronomical Journal 134 1145
A G Roca et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 224002
Benjamin P Haley et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 180 012075
Bruce R Fabijonas and Darryl D Holm 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 7609
Z. Eisler and J. Kertész 2007 EPL 77 28001
K. Matia et al 2004 Europhys. Lett. 66 909
W. F. Brisken et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 126 3090