C W Stubbs 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184033 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/18/184033
C W Stubbs
Show affiliationsOptical and infrared observations have thus far detected more celestial cataclysms than have been seen in gravity waves (GW). This argues that we should search for gravity wave signatures that correspond to transient variables seen at optical wavelengths, at precisely known positions. There is an unknown time delay between the optical and gravitational transient, but knowing the source location precisely specifies the corresponding time delays across the gravitational antenna network as a function of the GW-to-optical arrival time difference. Optical searches should detect virtually all supernovae that are plausible gravitational radiation sources. The transient optical signature expected from merging compact objects is not as well understood, but there are good reasons to expect detectable transient optical/IR emission from most of these sources as well. The next generation of deep wide-field surveys (for example PanSTARRS and LSST) will be sensitive to subtle optical variability, but we need to fill the 'blind spots' that exist in the galactic plane, and for optically bright transient sources. In particular, a galactic plane variability survey at λ~ 2 µm seems worthwhile. Science would benefit from closer coordination between the various optical survey projects and the gravity wave community.
04.30.Db Wave generation and sources
95.75.Wx Time series analysis, time variability
Issue 18 (21 September 2008)
Received 16 December 2007, in final form 2 April 2008
Published 2 September 2008
C W Stubbs 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184033
M C Babiuc et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 125012
F Schiller et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 113017
Martin Bojowald and Rupam Das 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 195006
Rakesh Voggu et al 2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 215211
B Jack et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 103013
L Blackburn et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184004
Dong Cai et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 345102
Yang Li 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 104051
and quantum Painlevé equations
M Jimbo et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 175205