M Rakhmanov et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184017 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/18/184017
M Rakhmanov1, J D Romano1,2 and J T Whelan3
Show affiliationsSearches for gravitational waves with km-scale laser interferometers often involve the long-wavelength approximation to describe the detector response. The prevailing assumption is that the corrections to the detector response due to its finite size are small and the errors due to the long-wavelength approximation are negligible. Recently, however, Baskaran and Grishchuk (2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 4041) found that in a simple Michelson interferometer such errors can be as large as 10%. For more accurate analysis, these authors proposed to use a linear-frequency correction to the long-wavelength approximation. In this paper we revisit these calculations. We show that the linear-frequency correction is inadequate for certain locations in the sky and therefore accurate analysis requires taking into account the exact formula, commonly derived from the photon round-trip propagation time. Also, we extend the calculations to include the effect of Fabry–Perot resonators in the interferometer arms. Here we show that a simple approximation which combines the long-wavelength Michelson response with the single-pole approximation to the Fabry–Perot transfer function produces rather accurate results. In particular, the difference between the exact and the approximate formulae is at most 2–3% for those locations in the sky where the detector response is greater than half of its maximum value. We analyse the impact of such errors on detection sensitivity and parameter estimation in searches for periodic gravitational waves emitted by a known pulsar, and in searches for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background. At frequencies up to 1 kHz, the effect of such errors is at most 1–2%. For higher frequencies, or if more accuracy is required, one should use the exact formula for the detector response.
04.80.Nn Gravitational wave detectors and experiments
95.80.+p Astronomical catalogs, atlases, sky surveys, databases, retrieval systems, archives, etc.
78A60 Lasers, masers, optical bistability, nonlinear optics (See also 81V80)
Issue 18 (21 September 2008)
Received 23 April 2008, in final form 3 July 2008
Published 2 September 2008
M Rakhmanov et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184017
Roberto Rozas and Thomas Kraska 2007 Nanotechnology 18 165706
Robert Grone et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 212002
Juan A Bonachela et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 202001
Jan H Meinke and Ulrich H E Hansmann 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 285215
Iwan Jensen and Andrew Rechnitzer 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 215002
Rainer Schödel et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 131 012044
Luigi Delle Site et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 242101
D K Chambers et al 2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 382202
Clemens Neuenhahn and Florian Marquardt 2008 New J. Phys. 10 115018