Demian H J Cho et al 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 1035 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/5/001
Demian H J Cho1, Antonios A Tsokaros2 and Alan G Wiseman
Show affiliationsThe finite part of the self-force on a static, non-minimally coupled scalar test charge outside a Schwarzschild black hole is zero. This result is determined from the work required to slowly raise or lower the charge through an infinitesimal distance. Unlike similar force calculations for minimally-coupled scalar charges or electric charges, we find that we must account for a flux of field energy that passes through the horizon and changes the mass and area of the black hole when the charge is displaced. This occurs even for an arbitrarily slow displacement of the non-minimally coupled scalar charge. For a positive coupling constant, the area of the hole increases when the charge is lowered and decreases when the charge is raised. The fact that the self-force vanishes for a static, non-minimally coupled scalar charge in Schwarzschild spacetime agrees with a simple prediction of the Quinn–Wald axioms. However, Zel'nikov and Frolov computed a non-vanishing self-force for a non-minimally coupled charge. Our method of calculation closely parallels the derivation of Zel'nikov and Frolov, and we show that their omission of this unusual flux is responsible for their (incorrect) result. When the flux is accounted for, the self-force vanishes. This correction eliminates a potential counter example to the Quinn–Wald axioms. The fact that the area of the black hole changes when the charge is displaced brings up two interesting questions that did not arise in similar calculations for static electric charges and minimally coupled scalar charges. (1) How can we reconcile a decrease in the area of the black hole horizon with the area theorem which concludes that δAreahorizon ≥ 0? The key hypothesis of the area theorem is that the stress–energy tensor must satisfy a null-energy condition Tαβlαlβ ≥ 0 for any null vector lα. We explicitly show that the stress–energy associated with a non-minimally coupled field does not satisfy this condition, and this violation of the hypothesis leads directly to the decreasing area. (2) Since the entropy of a Schwarzschild black hole is proportional to the area of the horizon, and the area of the horizon will change while we slowly raise or lower the charge, we must ask: does this simple process conserve entropy? The process does conserve entropy; however, the appropriate entropy for a gravitational theory with a non-minimally coupled scalar field is the Iyer–Wald generalized entropy which—in addition to the area of the black hole—includes a contribution from the scalar field evaluated on the horizon. We explicitly calculate the generalized entropy of a Schwarzschild black hole bathed in the field of a static, non-minimally coupled scalar test charge, and show that it is conserved when the charge is slowly raised or lowered.
04.70.-s Physics of black holes
Issue 5 (7 March 2007)
Received 27 November 2006, in final form 4 December 2006
Published 1 February 2007
Demian H J Cho et al 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 1035
J T Padding et al 2005 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 S3393
Lei Yu et al 2006 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19 719
Q Liu et al 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 43 1171
Jonathan P K Doye et al 2004 Phys. Biol. 1 P9
T.E. Evans et al 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 024002
Liu Yao-Wen et al 2005 Chinese Phys. Lett. 22 1270
Gaetano Zimbardo 2006 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48 B295
B Labit et al 2007 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49 B281
S J Zweben et al 2007 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49 S1