Edward Anderson 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 5317 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/22/001
Edward Anderson
Show affiliationsIn Euclidean relational particle mechanics (ERPM) only relative times, relative angles and relative separations are meaningful, while in similarity relational particle mechanics (SRPM) only relative times, relative angles and ratios of relative separations are. These theories are clearly of interest in the absolute or relative motion debate. In this paper, ERPM and SRPM are provided in fully reduced form for three particles in 2D, i.e. the classical dynamics on triangleland in 2D with and without scale. Exact solutions to each of these are then found, and simple Newton–Coulomb-like and harmonic oscillator-like SRPM models are studied numerically. The mathematics one arrives at thus overlaps in many ways with that which arises in the absolutist approach. The ERPM gives standard mathematics, while the SRPM has standard small-relative-scale behaviour and an unexpected but in itself standard universal large-relative-scale behaviour. One way in which SRPM is unusual is that it is a model in which a symmetry principle underlies an unexpected departure from standard physical behaviour at sufficiently large relative scales (interpolation between the abovementioned two behaviours). ERPM and SRPM are also theoretically interesting at the quantum level, both on their own merit and as toy models for the development of various approaches to the problems of time and of observables in quantum general relativity.
Issue 22 (21 November 2007)
Received 30 April 2007, in final form 7 August 2007
Published 24 October 2007
Edward Anderson 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 5317
José Alberto Galicia et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S1379
R Nath et al 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 4285
V S Pande et al 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 3657
Tsampikos Kottos 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 10761
Yuan Ze et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117203
W. K. M. Rice and Philip J. Armitage 2003 ApJ 598 L55
E C Montenegro et al 1986 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19 3287
Peter M. Frinchaboy and Steven R. Majewski 2008 The Astronomical Journal 136 118
R Puttner et al 1995 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 2425