Erik Schnetter et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S553 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/16/S14
Erik Schnetter1,2, Peter Diener1,3, Ernst Nils Dorband1,3 and Manuel Tiglio1,3
Show affiliationsWe describe a generic infrastructure for time evolution simulations in numerical relativity using multiple grid patches. After a motivation of this approach, we discuss the relative advantages of global and patch-local tensor bases. We describe both our multi-patch infrastructure and our time evolution scheme, and comment on adaptive time integrators and parallelization. We also describe various patch system topologies that provide spherical outer and/or multiple inner boundaries. We employ penalty inter-patch boundary conditions, and we demonstrate the stability and accuracy of our three-dimensional implementation. We solve both a scalar wave equation on a stationary rotating black hole background and the full Einstein equations. For the scalar wave equation, we compare the effects of global and patch-local tensor bases, different finite differencing operators and the effect of artificial dissipation onto stability and accuracy. We show that multi-patch systems can directly compete with the so-called fixed mesh refinement approach; however, one can also combine both. For the Einstein equations, we show that using multiple grid patches with penalty boundary conditions leads to a robustly stable system. We also show long-term stable and accurate evolutions of a one-dimensional nonlinear gauge wave. Finally, we evolve weak gravitational waves in three dimensions and extract accurate waveforms, taking advantage of the spherical shape of our grid lines.
04.70.-s Physics of black holes
83C05 Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems)
Issue 16 (21 August 2006)
Received 20 February 2006, in final form 6 June 2006
Published 27 July 2006
Erik Schnetter et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S553
Carlos F Sopuerta et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S579
Philip F. Hopkins et al. 2009 ApJS 181 486
Philip F. Hopkins et al. 2009 ApJS 181 135
Tod R. Lauer and Todd A. Boroson 2009 ApJ 703 930
Christopher Z. Waters et al. 2009 ApJ 693 463
Kayhan Gültekin et al. 2009 ApJ 698 198
Ata Sarajedini et al. 2009 The Astronomical Journal 138 184
Tod R. Lauer et al. 2002 The Astronomical Journal 124 1975
Karl Gebhardt et al. 2001 The Astronomical Journal 122 2469