Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Wavefront distortion and beam pointing for LISA

Peter L Bender

Show affiliations


The dc pointing directions for the LISA laser beams will be chosen to minimize the sensitivity of the measured arm lengths to jitter in the beam pointing. The earliest studies of the effects of wavefront distortion included only astigmatism and defocus, so that the desired dc beam pointing directions were on the axis for the transmitting telescopes. But, if other aberrations cause the dc pointing directions to be considerably off axis, some of the laser beam intensity will be lost. A brief study of this effect has been carried out. As examples, several cases with defocus, spherical aberration, and two components each of astigmatism and coma have been investigated. Within this class of models, pure astigmatism turned out to give the maximum sensitivity to beam pointing jitter, for a given rms wavefront distortion. Although further study is needed, it appears that the usually quoted requirements of 3 × 10−8 rad for the dc beam pointing offsets and 8 × 10−9 rad Hz−1/2 for the pointing jitter are probably reasonable choices.


PACS

04.80.Nn Gravitational wave detectors and experiments

97.60.Lf Black holes

95.55.Ym Gravitational radiation detectors; mass spectrometers; and other instrumentation and techniques

95.85.Sz Gravitational radiation, magnetic fields, and other observations

MSC

83C35 Gravitational waves

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Gravitation and cosmology

Astrophysics and astroparticles

Dates

Issue 10 (21 May 2005)

Received 18 November 2004

Published 26 April 2005



  1. Wavefront distortion and beam pointing for LISA

    Peter L Bender 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S339

  2. Electronic phase delay—a first step towards a bench-top model of LISA

    James Ira Thorpe et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S227

  3. Proceedings of the 5th International LISA Symposium, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 12-15 July 2004

    Oliver Jennrich 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22

  4. Implementation of the phasemeter for LISA LTP

    A M Cruise et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S165

  5. LISA Pathfinder drag-free control and system implications

    Walter Fichter et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S139

  6. The nuclear orbital distribution in galaxies as a fossil record of black hole formation from integral-field spectroscopy

    Michele Cappellari and Richard M McDermid 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S347

  7. Laser frequency noise suppression by arm-locking in LISA: progress towards a bench-top demonstration

    B S Sheard et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S221

  8. An optical readout system for the drag-free control of LISA

    F Acernese et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S279

  9. The LTP experiment on the LISA Pathfinder mission

    S Anza et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S125

  10. Technology developments for ACIGA high power test facility for advanced interferometry

    P Barriga et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S199

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.