Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article
Class. Quantum Grav. 21 No 4 (21 February 2004) L17-L20
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/21/4/L03
PII: S0264-9381(04)71925-5

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Supersymmetric Gödel-type universe in four dimensions

Marco M Caldarelli and Dietmar Klemm

Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università di Milano and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy

Email: marco.caldarelli@mi.infn.it and dietmar.klemm@mi.infn.it

Received 14 November 2003
Published 7 January 2004

Abstract. We generalize the classification of all supersymmetric solutions of pure N  =  2, D  =  4 gauged supergravity to the case when external sources are included. It is shown that the source must be an electrically charged dust. We give a particular solution to the resulting equations that describes a Gödel-type universe preserving one quarter of the supersymmetries.

PACS numbers: 04.20.Jb, 04.65. + e, 11.30.Pb

In a recent paper [1], we classified all supersymmetric solutions of pure gauged N  =  2 supergravity in four dimensions, generalizing the results of Tod [2] in the ungauged case. Unlike [2], we did not include external sources, and to remedy this will be the main scope of this letter. The motivation for including sources is twofold. First, it is desirable to have a more complete treatment that also considers this case. Second, external dust sources (as well as a negative cosmological constant) are necessary ingredients to obtain the Gödel universe [3] or its generalizations [4].

These spacetimes, which suffer from closed timelike curves (CTCs), have become fashionable recently, after the discovery of a maximally supersymmetric analogue of the Gödel universe in five dimensions [5]. Generalizations to 10 and 11 dimensions have been found in [6, 7], and a variety of black holes embedded in Gödel spacetimes have been discussed in [8-10]. Various mechanisms of chronology protection using holographic screening [11] or supertubes [12] appeared in the literature. Particle and brane probes in these backgrounds were analysed in [11-13]. Finally, string propagation on Gödel universes, which are T-dual to compactified pp-waves [11], was initiated in [14].

The study of these solutions hopefully will shed some light on holography for spaces more general than AdS, and on the resolution of CTCs by string theory. One might thus ask whether there are members of the family of Gödel-type solutions in four dimensions [4] that preserve some supersymmetry. As we said, these spacetimes have the common feature of a negative cosmological constant and external dust sources, so a natural framework to address this question is N  =  2, D  =  4 gauged supergravity with sources. In ungauged four-dimensional N  =  2 supergravity, supersymmetry imposes the condition that the sources form a perfect fluid with vanishing pressure [2]. If this holds true also in the gauged case, it is exactly what we want in order to obtain Gödel-type solutions. Indeed, it will be shown below that also in the gauged version, the source must be a charged dust; the only difference is that now the dust carries only electric charge, whereas the magnetic charge has to vanish.

In what follows, we use the conventions of [1]. In that paper, we obtained the general solution of N  =  2, D  =  4 gauged supergravity that admits at least one Killing spinor epsilon. The solutions fall into two classes depending on whether the Killing vector Inline equation constructed from epsilon is timelike or lightlike. To keep things short, we will generalize only the timelike case to the inclusion of external sources. The generalization of the lightlike case will be discussed elsewhere.

Let us briefly recall the results of [1] for timelike Vμ (rewritten here in a slightly more compact form). The general BPS solution readsNote1

Equation (1)

where i  =  1, 2; x1  =  x, x2  =  y, and we defined ℓF  =  2i/(f  -  ig), with Inline equation and Inline equation. Here 1/ℓ is the minimal coupling between the graviphoton and the gravitini, which is related to the cosmological constant by Λ  =   - 3ℓ - 2. The timelike Killing vector is given by V  =  ∂t. The functions Inline equation, which depend on x, y, z, are determined by the system

Equation (2)

Equation (3)

Equation (4)

where Δ  =  ∂2x  +  ∂2y, and a prime denotes differentiation with respect to z. (2) comes from the combined Maxwell equation and Bianchi identity, whereas (3) results from the integrability condition for the Killing spinor epsilon. Finally, the shift vector ω is obtained fromNote2

Equation (5)

with epsilon12  =  1.

If we allow external charged sources carrying electric current Jeμ and magnetic current Jmμ, the Maxwell equations read

Equation (6)

Note that the inclusion of magnetic currents modifies the Bianchi identity, so it is no longer possible to define an electromagnetic vector potential Inline equation in the presence of continuous magnetic charge distributions. As Inline equation appears explicitly in the supercovariant derivative

Equation (7)

of gauged supergravity, consistency requires setting the magnetic current Jm to zero. For the time being, we will keep Jm, and show at the end that conservation of the combined energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field and the sources also leads to the condition of vanishing Jm. The charged sources carry some energy-momentum Textμν. Imposing the integrability conditions, i.e. the vanishing of the supercurvature [1],

Equation (8)

we obtain, after some algebra, the BPS conditions on the currents,

Equation (9)

where κ is up to now an arbitrary real function. Conservation of J requires that κ be time independent. The Einstein equations imply that these sources have the dust stress tensor

Equation (10)

As the Einstein tensor is conserved, the same must be true for the combined energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field and the sources. This leads to g  =  0 and thus, from (9), to Jm  =  0,Note3 which, as pointed out above, is already necessary in order to define a gauge potential Inline equation. Thus we set Jm  =  0 in what follows.

We can now follow closely the discussion of the sourceless timelike solutions in [1]. In fact, the only difference is in Maxwell's equations which now include the sources. The general supersymmetric solution with timelike Killing vector Vμ is therefore still given by (1), (3) and (5), but with (2) replaced by

Equation (11)

Furthermore, the condition g  =  0 yields Inline equation. The imaginary part of equation (3) then implies F '  =  0, so that the functions F and phi are determined by solving the system

Equation (12)

Equation (13)

Let us assume that κ is a positive constant. Then a simple solution to (12) is given by Inline equation. Equation (13) becomes the Liouville equation and describes a two-manifold hij  =  e2phiδij of constant curvature  - 12πκ. For convenience, we choose the parabolic Liouville solution to cast the transverse metric in Poincaré coordinates. This leads to the metric

Equation (14)

with uniform magnetic flux through the transverse manifold,

Equation (15)

A detailed analysis shows that this solution preserves exactly 1/4 of the original supersymmetry. The resulting spacetime has the Gödel-type metric with vorticity Ω  =  2/ℓ and parameter Inline equation given in [4], and represents a spacetime homogeneous universe with rigidly rotating dust and a magnetic field. The presence of CTCs is most obvious in cylindrical coordinates,

Equation (16)

For sufficiently large r the vector ∂varphi is timelike, and its integral curves become CTCs.

In the ungauged case, the charged dust source can be interpreted as the dilaton field of the N  =  4 theory [15]. It would be interesting to see whether such an identification is possible also in the gauged case, for example, by embedding the solution into N  =  4 gauged supergravity.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by INFN, MURST and by the European Commission RTN program HPRN-CT-2000-00131, in which MMC and DK are associated to the University of Torino.

References
[1] 
Caldarelli M M and Klemm D 2003 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP09(2003)019 
IOPscience
[2] 
Tod K P 1983 Phys. Lett. B 121 241 
CrossRef
[3] 
Gödel K 1949 Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 447 
CrossRef
[4] 
Rebouças M J and Tiomno J 1983 Phys. Rev. D 28 1251 
CrossRef
[5] 
Gauntlett J P, Gutowski J B, Hull C M, Pakis S and Reall H S 2002 Preprint hep-th/0209114  
[6] 
Gauntlett J P and Pakis S 2003 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP04(2003)039 
IOPscience
[7] 
Harmark T and Takayanagi T 2003 Nucl. Phys. B 662 3 
CrossRef
[8] 
Herdeiro C A 2003 Nucl. Phys. B 665 189 
CrossRef
Herdeiro C A 2003 Preprint hep-th/0307194  
[9] 
Gimon E G and Hashimoto A 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 021601 
CrossRefPubMed
[10] 
Brecher D, Danielsson U H, Gregory J P and Olsson M E 2003 Preprint hep-th/0309058  
[11] 
Boyda E K, Ganguli S, Horava P and Varadarajan U 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67 106003 
CrossRef
[12] 
Drukker N, Fiol B and Simon J 2003 Preprint hep-th/0306057  

Drukker N, Fiol B and Simon J 2003 Preprint hep-th/0309199  
[13] 
Hikida Y and Rey S J 2003 Nucl. Phys. B 669 57 
CrossRef
[14] 
Brace D, Herdeiro C A and Hirano S 2003 Preprint hep-th/0307265  
[15] 
Kallosh R, Linde A D, Ortín T, Peet A and Van Proeyen A 1992 Phys. Rev. D 46 5278 
CrossRef

Notes

Note1
 We have chosen the conformal gauge for the two-metric hij appearing in [1].
Note2
 It can be shown that the integrability conditions for (5) follow from the Maxwell equations, even in the presence of external sources.
Note3
 The violation of the divergence of the stress tensor is proportional to ℓ - 1, and thus vanishes in the ungauged case ℓ → ∞, where Jm  =  0 is no longer necessary [2].



Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.