Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

How can exact and approximate solutions of Einstein's field equations be compared?

V S Manko1 and E Ruiz2

Show affiliations


The problem of comparison of the stationary axisymmetric vacuum solutions obtained within the framework of exact and approximate approaches for the description of the same general relativistic systems is considered. We suggest two ways of carrying out such comparison: (i) through the calculation of the Ernst complex potential associated with the approximate solution whose form on the symmetry axis is subsequently used for the identification of the exact solution possessing the same multipole structure, and (ii) the generation of approximate solutions from exact ones by expanding the latter in series of powers of small parameters. The central result of our paper is the derivation of the correct approximate analogues of the double-Kerr solution possessing the physically meaningful equilibrium configurations. We also show that the interpretation of an approximate solution originally attributed to it on the basis of some general physical suppositions may not coincide with its true nature established with the aid of a more accurate technique.


PACS

04.20.Jb Exact solutions

04.25.-g Approximation methods; equations of motion

MSC

83C15 Exact solutions

83C25 Approximation procedures, weak fields

83C05 Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems)

Subjects

Gravitation and cosmology

Dates

Issue 24 (21 December 2004)

Received 4 May 2004, in final form 27 October 2004

Published 25 November 2004



  1. How can exact and approximate solutions of Einstein's field equations be compared?

    V S Manko and E Ruiz 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5849

  2. Carbon allotropes and strong nanotube bundles

    H S Domingos 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 9083

  3. Flow equations for Hamiltonians: contrasting different approaches by using a numerically solvable model

    T Stauber and A Mielke 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 2707

  4. Determination of the energy-momentum densities of aluminium by electron momentum spectroscopy

    M Vos et al 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 3645

  5. Droplet minimizers for the Gates–Lebowitz–Penrose free energy functional

    E A Carlen et al 2009 Nonlinearity 22 2919

  6. Estimating intratidal nonlinearity of respiratory system mechanics: a model study using the enhanced gliding-SLICE method

    Stefan Schumann et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 1341

  7. Algebraic Bethe ansatz method for the exact calculation of energy spectra and form factors: applications to models of Bose–Einstein condensates and metallic nanograins

    Jon Links et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 R63

  8. Three-level coupled systems and parasupersymmetric shape invariance

    A N F Aleixo and A B Balantekin 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 6433

  9. On q-analogues of the quantum harmonic oscillator and the quantum group SU(2)q

    A J Macfarlane 1989 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22 4581

  10. Understanding dielectrophoretic trapping of neuronal cells: modelling electric field, electrode-liquid interface and fluid flow

    T Heida et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 1592

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.