Donato Bini et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5427 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/23/009
Donato Bini1,2,3, Fernando de Felice4 and Andrea Geralico2,5
Show affiliationsWe study the behaviour of spinning test particles in the Schwarzschild spacetime. Using Mathisson–Papapetrou equations of motion, we confine our attention to spatially circular orbits and search for observable effects which could eventually discriminate among the standard supplementary conditions, namely the Corinaldesi–Papapetrou, Pirani and Tulczyjew. We find that if the world line chosen for the multipole reduction and whose unit tangent we denote as U is a circular orbit then the generalized momentum P of the spinning test particle is also tangent to a circular orbit even though P and U are not parallel four-vectors. These orbits are shown to exist because the spin-induced tidal forces provide the required acceleration irrespective of the supplementary conditions we select. Of course, in the limit of a small spin, the particle's orbit is close to being a circular geodesic and the (small) deviation of the angular velocities from the geodesic values can be of an arbitrary sign, corresponding to the possible spin-up and spin-down alignment to the z-axis. When two spinning particles orbit around a gravitating source in opposite directions, they make one loop with respect to a given static observer with different arrival times. This difference is termed the clock effect. We find that a nonzero gravitomagnetic clock effect appears for oppositely orbiting spin-up or spin-down particles even in the Schwarzschild spacetime. This allows us to establish a formal analogy with the case of (spin-less) geodesics on the equatorial plane of the Kerr spacetime. This result can be verified experimentally.
Issue 23 (7 December 2004)
Received 19 July 2004
Published 11 November 2004
Donato Bini et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5427
Guangsup Cho et al 2004 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 2863
Orlando Auciello et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 R539
Luca Donetti and Claudio Destri 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 6003
Christophe Texier and Gilles Montambaux 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 3455
Boris G Konopelchenko and Antonio Moro 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 L105
R K Dash et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S2425
R Wehlitz and S B Whitfield 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 L719
Masahide Gunji and Masao Washizu 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2417
Gregory V Morozov et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 3052