Tonatiuh Matos et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5275 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/018
Tonatiuh Matos1, Darío Núñez2 and Roberto A Sussman2
Show affiliationsAlthough galactic dark matter halos are basically Newtonian structures, the study of their interplay with large-scale cosmic evolution and with relativistic effects, such as gravitational lenses, quintessence sources or gravitational waves, makes it necessary to obtain adequate relativistic descriptions for these self-gravitating systems. With this purpose in mind, we construct a post-Newtonian fluid framework for the 'Navarro–Frenk–White' (NFW) models of galactic halos that follow from N-body numerical simulations. Since these simulations are unable to resolve regions very near the halo centre, the extrapolation of the fitting formula leads to a spherically averaged 'universal' density profile that diverges at the origin. We remove this inconvenient feature by replacing a small central region of the NFW halo with an interior Schwarzschild solution with constant density, continuously matched to the remaining NFW spacetime. A model of a single halo, as an isolated object with finite mass, follows by smoothly matching the NFW spacetime to a Schwarzschild vacuum exterior along the virial radius, the physical 'cut-off' customarily imposed, as the mass associated with NFW profiles diverges asymptotically. Numerical simulations assume weakly interacting collisionless particles, hence we suggest that NFW halos approximately satisfy an 'ideal gas' type of equation of state, where mass-density is the dominant rest-mass contribution to matter-energy, with the internal energy contribution associated with an anisotropic kinetic pressure. We show that, outside the central core, this pressure and the mass density roughly satisfy a polytropic relation. Since stellar polytropes are the equilibrium configurations in Tsallis' non-extensive formalism of statistical mechanics, we argue that NFW halos might provide a rough empirical estimate of the free parameter q of Tsallis' formalism.
04.20.-q Classical general relativity
98.62.Sb Gravitational lenses and luminous arcs
95.30.Sf Relativity and gravitation
Issue 22 (21 November 2004)
Received 18 March 2004
Published 29 October 2004
Tonatiuh Matos et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5275
Willi A Kalender 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 R29
Jianguo Rao et al 1995 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 4715
Wen-Xiu Ma 1998 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 7279
F Aubin et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 103017
Duan Zhi-Hui et al 2003 Chinese Phys. Lett. 20 2130
K M Langen et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 4259
W. R. Binns et al. 2005 ApJ 634 351
J P L Hatchett and M Okada 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 3883
Ann Merchant Boesgaard et al. 2003 ApJ 582 410