Éanna É Flanagan 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3817 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/N02
Éanna É Flanagan
Show affiliationsIt has frequently been claimed in the literature that the classical physical predictions of scalar–tensor theories of gravity depend on the conformal frame in which the theory is formulated. We argue that this claim is false, and that all classical physical predictions are conformal-frame invariants. We also respond to criticisms by Vollick (2003 Preprint gr-qc/0312041), in which this issue arises, of our recent analysis of the Palatini form of 1/R gravity.
04.50.-h Higher-dimensional gravity and other theories of gravity
Issue 15 (7 August 2004)
Received 26 February 2004
Published 20 July 2004
Éanna É Flanagan 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3817
M Gich et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 687
Wolfgang Tichy and Éanna É Flanagan 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3995
D Field et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 4371
Steve Drasco et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S801
Sheng Wang et al. 2009 ApJ 691 547
X Wang et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 815
K Hosaka et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 L49
Abu Samah Zuruzi et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 531
R Curik et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 59