Akihiro Ishibashi and Robert M Wald 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 2981 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/12/012
Akihiro Ishibashi1 and Robert M Wald2
Show affiliationsIn recent years, there has been considerable interest in theories formulated in anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime. However, AdS spacetime fails to be globally hyperbolic, so a classical field satisfying a hyperbolic wave equation on AdS spacetime need not have a well-defined dynamics. Nevertheless, AdS spacetime is static, so the possible rules of dynamics for a field satisfying a linear wave equation are constrained by our previous general analysis—given in paper II—where it was shown that the possible choices of dynamics correspond to choices of positive, self-adjoint extensions of a certain differential operator, A. In the present paper, we reduce the analysis of electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations in AdS spacetime to scalar wave equations. We then apply our general results to analyse the possible dynamics of scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations in AdS spacetime. In AdS spacetime, the freedom (if any) in choosing self-adjoint extensions of A corresponds to the freedom (if any) in choosing suitable boundary conditions at infinity, so our analysis determines all the possible boundary conditions that can be imposed at infinity. In particular, we show that other boundary conditions besides the Dirichlet and Neumann conditions may be possible, depending on the value of the effective mass for scalar field perturbations, and depending on the number of spacetime dimensions and type of mode for electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations.
04.40.Nr Einstein-Maxwell spacetimes, spacetimes with fluids, radiation or classical fields
04.20.Gz Spacetime topology, causal structure, spinor structure
Issue 12 (21 June 2004)
Received 9 March 2004
Published 18 May 2004
Akihiro Ishibashi and Robert M Wald 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 2981
Akihiro Ishibashi and Robert M Wald 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3815
H F Dowker and S N Thambyahpillai 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 127
Bing Tan et al 2005 Nanotechnology 16 S502
Steve Drasco 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S769
Roderick Dewar 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 631
K Dawson et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2223
K Knudsen et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 124 012029
Giovanni Mazzarella et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 125301
R H C Lopes et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119 042019