Sanjeev S Seahra and Paul S Wesson 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 1321 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/7/306
Sanjeev S Seahra and Paul S Wesson
Show affiliationsStated succinctly, the original version of the Campbell–Magaard theorem says that it is always possible to locally embed any solution of four-dimensional general relativity in a five-dimensional Ricci-flat manifold. We discuss the proof of this theorem (and its variants) in n dimensions, and its application to current theories that postulate that our universe is a four-dimensional hypersurface Σ0 within a five-dimensional manifold, such as space–time–matter (STM) theory and the Randall and Sundrum (RS) braneworld scenario. In particular, we determine whether or not arbitrary spacetimes may be embedded in such theories, and demonstrate how these seemingly disparate models are interconnected. Special attention is given to the motion of test observers in five dimensions, and the circumstances under which they are confined to Σ0. For each five-dimensional scenario considered, the requirement that observers be confined to the embedded spacetime places restrictions on the 4-geometry. For example, we find that observers in the thin braneworld scenario can be localized around the brane if its total stress–energy tensor obeys the five-dimensional strong energy condition. As a concrete example of some of our technical results, we discuss a
2 symmetric embedding of the standard radiation-dominated cosmology in a five-dimensional vacuum.
04.50.-h Higher-dimensional gravity and other theories of gravity
04.20.Cv Fundamental problems and general formalism
04.20.Gz Spacetime topology, causal structure, spinor structure
81T30 String and superstring theories; other extended objects (e.g., branes) (See also 83E30)
Issue 7 (7 April 2003)
Received 3 January 2003
Published 10 March 2003
Sanjeev S Seahra and Paul S Wesson 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 1321
Theodore W Burkhardt 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 L167
Stephen O'Dell 2006 Inverse Problems 22 1579
B Verma et al 1980 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13 1605
S Y Tong and Huasheng Wu 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 1231
K Hoshino and M Watabe 1978 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 11 1381
I S Heng et al 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 1889
Yu Zhang et al 2003 Inverse Problems 19 1113
Clemens Elster et al 2007 Metrologia 44 L31
C J Lundy and R E Olson 1996 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 1723