Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Spin foam models for quantum gravity

REVIEW ARTICLE

Alejandro Perez

Show affiliations


TOPICAL REVIEW

In this topical review, we review the present status of the spin foam formulation of non-perturbative (background-independent) quantum gravity. The topical review is divided into two parts. In the first part, we present a general introduction to the main ideas emphasizing their motivation from various perspectives. Riemannian three-dimensional gravity is used as a simple example to illustrate conceptual issues and the main goals of the approach. The main features of the various existing models for four-dimensional gravity are also presented here. We conclude with a discussion of important questions to be addressed in four dimensions (gauge invariance, discretization independence, etc).

In the second part, we concentrate on the definition of the Barrett–Crane model. We present the main results obtained in this framework from a critical perspective. Finally, we review the combinatorial formulation of spin foam models based on the dual group field theory technology. We present the Barrett–Crane model in this framework and review the finiteness results obtained for both its Riemannian and its Lorentzian variants.


PACS

04.60.Pp Loop quantum gravity, quantum geometry, spin foams

04.60.Ds Canonical quantization

MSC

81S10 Geometry and quantization, symplectic methods (See also 53D50)

83Cxx General relativity

Subjects

Gravitation and cosmology

Dates

Issue 6 (21 March 2003)

Received 4 September 2002, in final form 10 December 2002

Published 21 February 2003



  1. Spin foam models for quantum gravity

    Alejandro Perez 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 R43

  2. Full complex Fresnel holograms displayed on liquid crystal devices

    R Tudela et al 2003 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5 S189

  3. Microfabricated atomic clocks and magnetometers

    S Knappe et al 2006 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8 S318

  4. Log to non-log variation of magnetic relaxation: studies in steady and varying fields

    S K Hasanain et al 1992 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 5 92

  5. Correlative amplitude–operational phase entanglement embodied by the EPR-pair eigenstate |ηrangle

    Hongyi Fan 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 1007

  6. DSHARP—a wide-screen multi-projector display

    Gary K Starkweather 2003 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5 S136

  7. Bouncing shells

    T Dray 1990 Class. Quantum Grav. 7 L131

  8. The thermoelectric inhomogeneity of palladium wire

    Yong-Gyoo Kim et al 1997 Meas. Sci. Technol. 8 317

  9. One-complex-plane representation: a coherent-state description of entanglement and teleportation

    J Janszky et al 2002 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 4 S213

  10. Anomalous effective mass in MoS2

    P G Harper 1974 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 7 1247

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.