Akihiro Ishibashi and Robert M Wald 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3815 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/318
Akihiro Ishibashi1 and Robert M Wald2
Show affiliationsIt was previously shown by one of us that in any static, non-globally-hyperbolic, spacetime, it is always possible to define a sensible dynamics for a Klein–Gordon scalar field. The prescription proposed for doing so involved viewing the spatial derivative part, A, of the wave operator as an operator on a certain L2 Hilbert space
and then defining a positive, self-adjoint operator on
by taking the Friedrichs extension (or other positive extension) of A. However, this analysis left open the possibility that there could be other inequivalent prescriptions of a completely different nature that might also yield satisfactory definitions of the dynamics of a scalar field. We show here that this is not the case. Specifically, we show that if the dynamics agrees locally with the dynamics defined by the wave equation, if it admits a suitable conserved energy and if it satisfies certain other specified conditions, then it must correspond to the dynamics defined by choosing some positive, self-adjoint extension of A on
. Thus, subject to our requirements, the previously given prescription is the only possible way of defining the dynamics of a scalar field in a static, non-globally-hyperbolic, spacetime. In a subsequent paper, this result will be applied to the analysis of scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations of anti-de Sitter spacetime. By doing so, we will determine all possible choices of boundary conditions at infinity in anti-de Sitter spacetime that give rise to sensible dynamics.
04.20.Cv Fundamental problems and general formalism
04.20.Ex Initial value problem, existence and uniqueness of solutions
Issue 16 (21 August 2003)
Received 6 May 2003
Published 31 July 2003
Akihiro Ishibashi and Robert M Wald 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3815
H F Dowker and S N Thambyahpillai 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 127
Bing Tan et al 2005 Nanotechnology 16 S502
Steve Drasco 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S769
Roderick Dewar 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 631
K Dawson et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2223
K Knudsen et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 124 012029
Giovanni Mazzarella et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 125301
R H C Lopes et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119 042019
N K Prasad et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 114 012046