Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Disturbance reduction requirements for LISA

Bonny L Schumaker

Show affiliations


An overview is given of the sources and magnitudes of acceleration disturbances to the LISA proof masses (PMs). They are classified according to their sources as environmental noise, PM position sensor back-action, control-loop noise and PM-spacecraft (SC) stiffness. A general control model is used to establish relations among the noise sources, sensor errors and control-loop elements. Quantitative estimates are derived for the noise sources, and minimum requirements are inferred for sensor resolution and SC drag-free control-loop gain that are consistent both with the baseline in-band LISA budget for total acceleration noise and a possible extension to lower frequencies. For brevity, explicit expressions for each noise source are provided in tables, together with quantitative estimates for indicated parameter values. Additional tables list assumed parameter definitions and values; acceleration–noise goals and estimated totals; and minimum requirements for sensor resolution and SC control-loop gain, for frequencies ranging from 3 mHz down to 5 × 10−6 Hz.


PACS

95.55.Ym Gravitational radiation detectors; mass spectrometers; and other instrumentation and techniques

95.85.Sz Gravitational radiation, magnetic fields, and other observations

07.60.Ly Interferometers

MSC

78A60 Lasers, masers, optical bistability, nonlinear optics (See also 81V80)

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Gravitation and cosmology

Astrophysics and astroparticles

Dates

Issue 10 (21 May 2003)

Received 13 December 2002

Published 29 April 2003



  1. Disturbance reduction requirements for LISA

    Bonny L Schumaker 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 S239

  2. Interaction of higher-dimensional rotating black holes with branes

    Valeri P Frolov et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3483

  3. Inter-relations between classical cross sections for rotational transitions in sudden atom-molecule collisions

    S S Bhattacharyya and A S Dickinson 1979 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 12 L521

  4. Heterogeneities in confined water and protein hydration water

    H E Stanley et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 504105

  5. Conformal non-geometric gravity in six dimensions and M-theory above the Planck energy

    C M Hull 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3233

  6. Floquet–Green function formalism for harmonically driven Hamiltonians

    D F Martinez 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 9827

  7. Influence of Oxygen Pressure on Structural and Sensing Properties of β-Ga2O3 Nanomaterial by Thermal Evaporation

    Ma Hai-Lin and Fan Duo-Wang 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117302

  8. Directed growth of diameter-tunable nanowires

    Birol Ozturk et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 365302

  9. Old and Young X-Ray Point Source Populations in Nearby Galaxies

    Edward J. M. Colbert et al. 2004 ApJ 602 231

  10. Kirchhoff diffractals

    O I Yordanov and K Ivanova 1994 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27 5979

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Discrete breathers in Bose–Einstein condensates
  2. Anomalous current in periodic Lorentz gases with infinite horizon
  3. Optical tomography: forward and inverse problems
More

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.