Lorenzo Iorio 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 L175 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/17/103
Lorenzo Iorio
Show affiliationsAccording to very recent developments of the LARES mission, which is devoted to the measurement of the general relativistic Lense–Thirring effect in the gravitational field of the Earth with satellite laser ranging, it seems that the LARES satellite might be finally launched in a polar, low-altitude orbit by means of a relatively low-cost rocket. The observable would be the node only. The Lense–Thirring effect on it would consist of a secular linear trend. The biasing classical secular nodal precessions due to the even zonal harmonics of the geopotential, which represent the major source of uncertainty, vanish if and only if the orbit is exactly polar. Due to the small altitude, even small possible deviations from the projected inclination, which might be induced by the orbital injection errors, should yield a rather large systematic error due to the mismodelled even zonal harmonics of geopotential in the measurement of the relativistic nodal shift. So, in this paper we show how such a configuration, in fact, to the present level of knowledge of the terrestrial gravitational field according to the EGM96 gravity model, should be of relatively little utility in increasing the obtainable accuracy in measuring the Lense–Thirring effect with respect not only to the originally proposed supplementary LARES–LAGEOS configuration, but also to the present LAGEOS–LAGEOS II experiment which has a total accuracy of the order of 20–30%. Maybe the situation will improve, at least to a certain extent, when the new, more accurate Earth gravity models from the CHAMP and GRACE missions become available.
91.10.Qm Harmonics of the gravity potential field
83D05 Relativistic gravitational theories other than Einstein's, including asymmetric field theories
Issue 17 (7 September 2002)
Received 16 July 2002
Published 16 August 2002
Lorenzo Iorio 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 L175
Thomas L Curtright and Cosmas K Zachos 2002 New J. Phys. 4 83
Helmut Friedrich 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 101
Bozhidar Z Iliev 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 4919
B Abbott et al 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 5343
K Binder 1997 Rep. Prog. Phys. 60 487
E C G Sudarshan and Anil Shaji 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 5073
David Mateos 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S713
Steven T Cundiff 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 R43
Roderich Tumulka 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 3245