Varun Sahni 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 3435 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/304
Varun Sahni
Show affiliationsI briefly review the cosmological constant problem and the issue of dark energy (or quintessence). Within the framework of quantum field theory, the vacuum expectation value of the energy momentum tensor formally diverges as k4. A cutoff at the Planck or electroweak scale leads to a cosmological constant which is, respectively, 10123 or 1055 times larger than the observed value, Λ/8πG
10−47 GeV4. The absence of a fundamental symmetry which could set the value of Λ to either zero or a very small value leads to the cosmological constant problem. Most cosmological scenarios favour a large time-dependent Λ-term in the past (in order to generate inflation at z
1010), and a small Λ-term today, to account for the current acceleration of the universe at z
1. Constraints arising from cosmological nucleosynthesis, CMB and structure formation constrain Λ to be sub-dominant during most of the intermediate epoch 1010 < z < 1. This leads to the cosmic coincidence conundrum which suggests that the acceleration of the universe is a recent phenomenon and that we live during a special epoch when the density in Λ and in matter are almost equal. Time varying models of dark energy can, to a certain extent, ameliorate the fine-tuning problem (faced by Λ), but do not resolve the puzzle of cosmic coincidence. I briefly review tracker models of dark energy, as well as more recent brane inspired ideas and the issue of horizons in an accelerating universe. Model independent methods which reconstruct the cosmic equation of state from supernova observations are also assessed. Finally, a new diagnostic of dark energy—statefinder— is discussed.
98.70.Vc Background radiations
81Txx Quantum field theory; related classical field theories (See also 70Sxx)
Issue 13 (7 July 2002)
Received 2 May 2002
Published 12 June 2002
Varun Sahni 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 3435
Pedro Lacerda and David C. Jewitt 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 1393
Comert Kural et al 2005 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 S3979
Pascal Hannequin and Jacky Mas 2002 Phys. Med. Biol. 47 4329
C P Burgess 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S795
F. Malbet et al 1998 ApJ 507 L149
Nathan Smith 2006 ApJ 644 1151
V Nedzelnitsky 1999 Metrologia 36 257
David G. Turner and James F. Burke 2002 The Astronomical Journal 124 2931
Paolo A. Mazzali et al. 2007 ApJ 661 892