I S Heng et al 1999 Class. Quantum Grav. 16 3439 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/11/302
I S Heng, M E Tobar and D G Blair
Show affiliationsAlgorithms for extracting a burst gravitational wave signal embedded within the noise of resonant-mass gravitational wave antenna have been well characterized theoretically, but their effects on experimental data, which can be contaminated by non-stationary, non-Gaussian noise, are still being studied. In this paper, we study the effects of three such algorithms, the zero-order prediction, adaptive Wiener-Kolmogorov and non-adaptive Wiener-Kolmogorov algorithms, on data from the resonant-mass gravitational wave antenna, Niobe, at the University of Western Australia. By applying these filters to computer-simulated GW signals, we show that the adaptive Wiener-Kolmogorov filter gives the best noise performance and signal-to-noise ratio in the presence of non-Gaussian noise. By searching for coincidences between the simulated signals, we show that a window larger than the sampling time of the data is necessary to observe a coincidence between all events. A method of applying pulse excitations to Niobe by amplitude modulating the pump oscillator driving the parametric transducer is also described. This method has the potential to be a very accurate calibration technique but uncertainties in the input and output gains reduce its accuracy. Finally, the adaptive and non-adaptive Wiener-Kolmogorov filters are applied to pulses generated by the amplitude modulation method to determine the overall timing delays and energy uncertainties of Niobe and its data acquisition system.
Issue 11 (November 1999)
Received 30 April 1999
I S Heng et al 1999 Class. Quantum Grav. 16 3439
J Podolský and M Belán 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 2811
J C Polf et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 N519
B Mota et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3361
Jennifer Oudry et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6979
B S Sathyaprakash 2000 Class. Quantum Grav. 17 L157
N Martsinovich et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S2815
B Cheal et al 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 2479
C Dawson et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 L525
G F Dell'Antonio and L Tenuta 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 5605