Ragbir Bhathal et al 2010 Eur. J. Phys. 31 23 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/31/1/003
Ragbir Bhathal1, Manjula D Sharma2 and Alberto Mendez2,3
Show affiliationsThis paper describes an educational analysis of a first year physics experiment on standing waves for engineering students. The educational analysis is based on the ACELL (Advancing Chemistry by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory) approach which includes a statement of educational objectives and an analysis of student learning experiences. The experiment is likely to be found in many physics departments, hence is appropriate to illustrate the ACELL approach in physics. The concepts associated with standing waves are difficult; however, they are underpinned by mathematical formulation which lend themselves to be visualized in experiments. The challenge is to strike a balance between these two for the particular student cohort. In this study, this balance is achieved by using simple equipment and providing appropriate scaffolds for students to associate abstract concepts with concrete visuals. In essence the experiment is designed to adequately manage cognitive resources. Students work in pairs and are questioned and assisted by demonstrators and academic staff during a 2 h practical class. Students were surveyed using the ACELL instrument. Analysis of the data showed that by completing the practical students felt that their understanding of physics had increased. Furthermore, students could see the relevance of this experiment to their engineering studies and that it provided them with an opportunity to take responsibility for their own learning. Overall they had a positive learning experience. In short there is a lot of dividend from a small outlay of resources.
01.50.Pa Laboratory experiments and apparatus
Issue 1 (January 2010)
Received 13 August 2009, in final form 11 September 2009
Published 4 November 2009
Ragbir Bhathal et al 2010 Eur. J. Phys. 31 23
B L C Dalsgaard 1982 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15 2711
T Brunier et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 59
T Petersson and B Hellsing 2010 Eur. J. Phys. 31 37
José A Langa and James C Robinson 2001 Nonlinearity 14 673
Richard H Price 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S281
Z S Wu et al 2005 Smart Mater. Struct. 14 S39
Marko Dorrestijn et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 2242
Daming Cheng et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 1661
A Umit Cosckun et al 2002 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 10 539