Chandru Iyer and G M Prabhu 2006 Eur. J. Phys. 27 819 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/27/4/013
Chandru Iyer1 and G M Prabhu2
Show affiliationsIn the rod and hole paradox as described by Rindler (1961 Am. J. Phys. 29 365–6), a rigid rod moves at high speed over a table towards a hole of the same size. Observations from the inertial frames of the rod and slot are widely different. Rindler explains these differences by the concept of differing perceptions in rigidity. Grøn and Johannesen (1993 Eur. J. Phys. 14 97–100) confirmed this aspect by computer simulation where the shapes of the rod are different as observed from the co-moving frames of the rod and slot. Lintel and Gruber (2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 19–23) presented an approach based on retardation due to speed of stress propagation. In this paper, we consider the situation when two parallel rods collide while approaching each other along a line at an inclination with their axis. The collisions of the top and bottom ends are shown to be reversed in time order as seen from the two co-moving frames. This result is explained by the concept of 'extended present' derived from the principle of relativity of simultaneity.
Issue 4 (July 2006)
Received 24 March 2006, in final form 5 April 2006
Published 8 May 2006
Chandru Iyer and G M Prabhu 2006 Eur. J. Phys. 27 819
Guy Ratel 2007 Metrologia 44 S102
Chang Zhe et al 2005 Chinese Phys. Lett. 22 791
Mark Alford and Qinghai Wang 2005 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 719
Keith S Taber 2009 Phys. Educ. 44 567
Dieter R Brill 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S97
Pei-Feng Ho and Kai-Ming Chi 2004 Nanotechnology 15 1059
N Benamar et al 2004 Physiol. Meas. 25 1199
K F Freed 1979 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 12 L17
O Gzowski et al 1981 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 14 L77