Articles

AN INTERFEROMETRIC SPECTRAL-LINE SURVEY OF IRC+10216 IN THE 345 GHz BAND

, , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2011 March 3 © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Nimesh A. Patel et al 2011 ApJS 193 17 DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/17

0067-0049/193/1/17

ABSTRACT

We report a spectral-line survey of the extreme carbon star IRC+10216 carried out between 293.9 and 354.8 GHz with the Submillimeter Array. A total of 442 lines were detected, more than 200 for the first time; 149 are unassigned. Maps at an angular resolution of ∼3'' were obtained for each line. A substantial new population of narrow lines with an expansion velocity of ∼4 km s−1 (i.e., ≈30% of the terminal velocity) was detected. Most of these are attributed to rotational transitions within vibrationally excited states, emitted from energy levels above the v = 0, J = 0 ground state with excitation energy of 1000–3000 K. Emission from these lines appears to be centered on the star with an angular extent of <1''. We use multiple transitions detected in several molecules to derive physical conditions in this inner envelope of IRC+10216.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Understanding the formation of complex molecules and dust grains in space is a major problem in modern astrophysics. Stars on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) efficiently produce C, N, O, and s-process elements. Mass loss leads to the formation of expanding circumstellar envelopes (CSEs) whose molecules and dust grains are major sources of replenishment of the interstellar medium (Herwig 2005; Busso et al. 1999). The radius of the C/O core, after the exhaustion of core He burning, is Rc ≈ 109 cm, and the temperature is ∼108 K. He burning continues in a shell around the core and the size of the stellar photosphere expands to R* ≈ 1013 cm. During the phase of intermittent burning of H and He (in the so-called thermal pulse), products of nuclear burning are dredged up by convection and brought to the stellar surface. The zone within a few stellar radii is dynamically important for mass loss; in this zone molecules produced in the stellar atmosphere are moved to a region away from the star that is cool enough (∼1000 K) so that dust grains can condense. Radiation pressure on the grains drives the CSE's expansion. The outer circumstellar region is comparatively less dense by several orders of magnitude and richer in molecular gas, steadily expanding outward with velocities ∼10 km s−1. The chemistry in the outermost part of the circumstellar shell is driven by the interstellar UV radiation (Glassgold 1996). Due to the clumpy nature of the shell, photochemistry may be important in the inner regions as well (Decin et al. 2010).

IRC+10216 (CW Leo) is a well-known AGB carbon star ([C] > [O] and the presence of s-process elements) with a high mass-loss rate (several ×10−5M yr−1) at a distance of 150 pc (e.g., Young et al. 1993; Crosas & Menten 1997). Owing to its closeness to the Sun, it has been possible to study the physical and chemical processes in its large CSE in great detail (e.g., Olofsson 1999). There are nearly 60 molecules observed in the circumstellar shell of IRC+10216 as a result of previous single-dish line surveys (Kawaguchi et al. 1995; Cernicharo et al. 2000; Avery et al. 1992; Groesbeck et al. 1994; He et al. 2008; Ziurys et al. 2002; Cernicharo et al. 2010; Tenenbaum et al. 2010).

Mapping the spatial distribution of molecules in the CSE of IRC+10216 is important for several reasons: (1) molecular (and isotopic) abundances can be accurately determined, since the excitation temperature can be inferred from the spatial location of the molecules in the envelope; (2) such data can be readily and quantitatively compared with chemical models predicting abundances as a function of radial distance from the star; (3) parent molecules can be distinguished from product molecules given their distribution in the envelopes; (4) molecules important for the creation of dust can be identified (e.g., the distributions of SiO, SiS, SiN, and silicon carbides appear to be centrally concentrated near the region of dust formation and probably are dominant constituents of grains forming in this region, their abundance decreases with distance from the star); and (5) multiple transitions of the same molecule allow mapping of physical conditions (e.g., temperature) in the envelope.

Interferometric maps of NaCN, SiO, SiS, CS, HC5N, SiCC, NaCl, MgNC, CN, HNC, C2H, C3H, and C4H have been presented by Guélin et al. (1996) and Dayal & Bieging (1995). Except for the SiO J = 5–4 line at 217 GHz (Schöier et al. 2006) and the CS J = 14–13 line at 685 GHz (Young et al. 2004) mapped with the Submillimeter Array7 (SMA), all the other maps were obtained using the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI) or the Berkeley–Illinois–Maryland Array (BIMA) at around 100 GHz.

We selected the 345 GHz band for our survey primarily because very little data exist in this frequency range, and it contains transitions from many astrochemically important molecules, including various salts, the cyanopolyyne HC3N, and cyclic molecules such as C3H2. Two line surveys in the 345 GHz band have been published by Avery et al. (1992) in the frequency range of 339.6–364.6 GHz with a sensitivity of 0.3 K rms made with the 15 m diameter James Clerk-Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) and by Groesbeck et al. (1994), in the frequency range of 330.2–358.1 GHz, with the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) 10.4 m telescope with an rms noise level of 65 mK (4.6 Jy). Our frequency range goes well beyond these surveys, including the range of 300–330 GHz, which is almost unexplored.

2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION

The SMA observations of IRC+10216 were done in two periods, each about one week long. The first was 2007 January and February and the second 2009 February. All observations were made with the array in the subcompact configuration, with baselines from 9.5 m to 69.1 m. The typical synthesized beam size was 3'' × 2''. Table 1 summarizes the observational parameters for all observations. The duration of each track was from 7 to 9 hr. The phase center was at α(2000) = 09h47m57fs38, δ(2000) = +13°16'43farcs70 for all observations. All tracks in the first phase of observation (in 2007) were carried out in mosaiced mode, with five pointings with offsets in right ascension and declination of (0, ''0'') and (±12, '' ± 12''). The 2009 epoch observations were done with a single pointing toward IRC+10216. The uv coverage and synthesized beam in one of the single-pointing tracks are shown in Figure 1. Titan and the quasars 0851+202 and 1055+018 were observed every 20 minutes for gain calibration. The spectral bandpass was calibrated by observations of Mars and Jupiter. Absolute flux calibration was determined by observations of Titan and Ganymede.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. UV coverage and beam pattern. Emission extended over angular scales greater than 15'' is expected to get resolved out significantly.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1. Summary of Observations

Date LSB USB Synthesized τ225 GHza Tsysb
  Coverage Coverage Beam   (SSB, K)
2007 Jan 25 338.9–340.9 348.9–350.9 3farcs0 × 2farcs0, P.A. = −4° 0.08 180–270
2007 Feb 5 338.4–340.1 348.7–350.0 3farcs0 × 2farcs0, P.A. = −4° 0.08 180–270
2007 Feb 7 298.1–300.1 308.1–310.1 3farcs2 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −4° 0.08 180–270
2007 Feb 8 300.1–302.1 310.1–312.1 3farcs3 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −6° 0.09 160–230
2007 Feb 9 336.4–338.4 346.5–348.4 3farcs0 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −8° 0.08 180–350
2007 Feb 10 334.5–336.4 344.5–346.4 3farcs0 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −8° 0.08 180–350
2007 Feb 12 332.5–334.5 342.5–344.5 3farcs0 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −8° 0.08 180–350
2009 Jan 22 302.0–306.0 313.9–317.9 3farcs3 × 2farcs3, P.A. = −24° 0.05 100–200
2009 Jan 23 312.0–316.0 323.9–327.9 2farcs7 × 2farcs1, P.A. = −13° 0.05 200–500
2009 Jan 26 315.9–319.9 327.9–331.9 2farcs7 × 2farcs1, P.A. = −13° 0.08 200–400
2009 Jan 30 338.9–342.9 350.8–354.8 3farcs0 × 2farcs2, P.A. = −2° 0.06 150–300
2009 Jan 31 319.9–323.9 331.9–335.8 3farcs0 × 2farcs4, P.A. = −6° 0.08 280–700
2009 Feb 2 293.9–297.9 305.9–309.9 5farcs9 × 3farcs0, P.A. = 38° 0.06 100–240

Notes. aZenith optical depth measured at 225 GHz with the CSO's radiometer. bTsys range is over all antennas and over the range of elevations covered during the observations of IRC+10216.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The visibility data were calibrated with the Miriad package (Sault et al. 1995). For the 2007 data, the mosaiced images were de-convolved using the Miriad task mossdi; the resulting synthesized beams are summarized in Table 1. The single-pointing 2009 data were calibrated with the MIR-IDL package8 and imaged in Miriad using the standard tasks invert, clean, and restor. Maps of continuum emission show the peak to have a position offset of (Δα, Δδ) ≈ (0farcs7, 0farcs2) from the phase center position. The absolute position measurements for the continuum emission are estimated to be accurate to ∼0farcs1. Taking into account the proper motion of IRC+10216 of ($\dot{\alpha },\dot{\delta })\approx (26,4)$ mas yr−1 determined by Menten et al. (2006), our position is consistent with theirs. The continuum emission was unresolved at the highest angular resolution of ∼0farcs8. The integrated continuum flux density was ∼650 mJy at 300 GHz and ∼1 Jy at 350 GHz, with an uncertainty of about 15% in the absolute flux calibration. The frequency resolution was 0.812 MHz per channel.

3. RESULTS

We detected a total of 442 lines. Of these, 297 could be assigned to known molecular transitions. Table 2 summarizes all detections, with fitted parameters and molecular assignments.

Table 2. Parameters of the Lines Detected in IRC+10216 in the SMA Line Survey

No. Species Vib. State Transition νobs σ νcat Δν Vexp σ Peak σ Iint θx θy P.A.
        (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) (km s−1) (km s−1) (Jy beam−1 km s−1) (Jy) (Jy km s−1) ('') ('') (°)
1 U     293972.6 0.8     5.3 0.8 3.1 0.6 3.4 ... ... ...
2 CH3CN   16(7)–15(7) 294024.8 3.0 294024.8 0.0 14.2 4.8 4.0 0.2 4.7 2.4 0.7 −2.2
3 U     294056.3 0.8     2.1 0.8 3.1 0.1 3.1 ... ... ...
4 CH3CN   16(6)–15(6) 294099.7 2.5 294098.9 0.8 14.7 4.1 8.2 0.3 12.7 3.2 2.5 −16.6
5 HCN v2 + v3 36–36 294121.3 5.8 294121.3 0.0 5.4 3.9 2.1 0.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 CH3CN   16(5)–15(5) 294162.1 2.7 294162.1 0.0 13.5 6.0 6.6 0.3 11.0 3.7 2.6 −14.5
7 CH3CN   16(4)–15(4) 294213.0 1.6 294211.9 1.1 13.5 2.3 9.1 0.2 14.8 3.2 3.1 −2.3
8 CH3CN   16(3)–15(3) 294252.8 0.5 294252.9 −0.1 14.3 0.9 30.3 0.7 61.0 4.3 3.9 11.5
9 CH3CN   16(0)–15(0) 294299.2 0.6 294300.8 −1.6 16.6 0.8 42.3 0.7 88.8 4.5 4.0 22.9
10 CH3CN v8 = 1 16(13)–15(13) 294383.7 1.3 294382.6 1.1 2.8 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 29Si34S   17–16 294404.2 1.3 294403.3 0.9 14.1 1.3 7.0 0.2 10.5 3.0 2.5 −9.1
12 CH3CN v8 = 1 16(12)–15(12) 294513.0 1.8 294512.9 0.1 4.3 0.3 ... ... ... ... ... ...
13 CH3CN v8 = 1 16(11)–15(11) 294630.1 1.0 294631.7 −1.6 5.4 2.0 5.6 0.2 6.4 2.2 1.1 12.5
14 NaCN ?   19(9, 11)–18(9, 10) 294671.3 3.4 294671.4 −0.1 14.6 3.5 3.3 0.4 5.8 4.2 3.2 49.8
15 30SiS v = 2 17–16 294727.9 0.8 294727.1 0.8 2.3 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
16 C4H   N = 31–30, J = 63/2–61/2 294915.8 1.0 294914.9 0.9 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
17 C4H   N = 31–30, J = 61/2–59/2 294953.3 0.4 294953.0 0.3 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
18 29SiCC   13(2, 12)–12(2, 11) 295240.6 0.1 295237.5 3.1 13.9 0.1 11.6 0.6 24.7 4.6 4.0 72.6
19 U     295401.2 0.3     4.0 0.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
20 U     295450.1 0.3     4.9 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.6 2.5 0.8 24.7
21 U     295519.3 0.4     4.1 0.4 1.1 0.2 1.9 3.8 2.1 −62.5
22 U     295542.6 0.5     4.4 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.6 ... ... ...
23 U     295582.6 0.3     15.5 0.3 2.3 0.2 10.1 8.4 6.7 2.1
24 U     295607.7 0.6     5.0 1.1 0.9 0.2 1.2 3.5 1.8 66.2
25 Si13CC   13(11, 2)–12(11, 1) 295699.9 0.4 295700.8 −0.9 2.3 0.6 0.7 0.0 1.2 3.6 3.0 71.9
26 U     295721.9 0.6     4.1 0.8 0.6 0.1 1.9 8.7 4.2 47.5
27 Si34S v = 3 17–16 295753.6 0.1 295748.6 5.0 6.2 0.1 2.9 0.2 4.1 2.7 2.3 −86.6
28 U     295772.0 1.4     ... ... 5.1 0.3 10.9 4.6 4.0 7.4
29 NaCN ?   19(7, 13)–18(7, 12) 295792.0 1.4 295791.8 0.2 ... ... 4.6 0.3 9.5 4.4 3.8 −40.5
30 30SiCC   14(0, 14)–13(0, 13) 295960.9 1.2 295965.6 −4.7 14.3 1.1 5.9 0.3 13.0 4.8 4.0 −73.9
31 30SiS v = 1 17–16 296150.9 2.1 296149.7 1.2 6.0 1.2 3.5 0.1 3.9 2.1 0.2 6.1
32 NaCN   19(6, 14)–18(6, 13) 296340.7 4.0 296342.5 −1.8 13.0 4.6 3.5 0.2 5.3 3.3 2.0 −66.0
33 U     296465.6 2.7     4.6 1.9 1.8 0.2 2.1 2.2 1.6 36.6
34 SiCC v3 = 1 13(9, 4)–12(9, 3) 296491.7 3.7 296489.9 1.8 9.4 6.8 8.4 0.3 10.1 2.1 1.6 3.0
35 U     296528.6 2.6     13.9 2.6 2.6 0.1 11.3 8.0 7.4 64.0
36 30SiO   7–6 296575.7 0.1 296575.7 0.0 13.9 0.1 91.8 2.1 165.6 3.9 3.5 31.6
37 SiCC v3 = 1 14(1, 14)–13(1, 13) 296658.6 2.8 296657.7 0.9 12.4 4.8 13.1 0.3 15.4 1.9 1.3 −14.0
38 AlF   9–8 296699.0 0.3 296698.9 0.1 14.0 0.2 31.8 1.3 88.8 5.6 5.5 61.1
39 U     296909.6 0.6     3.1 0.6 1.2 0.2 1.5 3.0 0.7 72.3
40 NaCN   19(5, 14)–18(5, 13) 296951.4 1.1 296955.1 −3.7 11.2 1.2 3.3 0.2 5.4 3.6 2.1 −57.6
41 29SiS v = 4 17–16 297007.7 2.3 297006.5 1.2 5.0 1.2 0.9 0.0 1.0 2.2 0.6 32.3
42 29Si33S v = 1 17–16 297068.8 1.1 297063.4 5.4 12.3 1.2 1.3 0.1 1.9 3.3 2.0 −43.9
43 U     297119.6 2.5     3.6 4.8 ... ... ... ... ... ...
44 U     297155.5 1.0     14.3 1.0 4.6 0.4 11.6 5.4 4.8 24.2
45 Si34S v = 2 17–16 297190.7 1.0 297189.4 1.3 3.3 0.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 ... ... ...
46 KCl v = 1 39–38 297262.5 1.1 297261.8 0.8 11.1 1.1 1.3 0.2 4.2 7.1 4.9 −29.0
47 13CCS ?   N = 31–30, J = 30–30 297467.4 2.4 297465.7 1.7 15.1 2.4 4.8 0.3 7.3 3.2 2.7 64.0
48 U     297527.8 2.6     14.0 2.9 1.9 0.2 10.6 10.0 8.2 −3.1
49 30SiS   17–16 297572.6 0.0 297572.2 0.4 13.8 0.0 124.9 3.1 217.4 3.7 3.3 21.5
50 U     297602.2 2.0     7.8 2.3 3.9 0.1 5.5 2.8 2.2 3.2
51 NaCN   19(4, 16)–18(4, 15) 297630.9 5.1 297631.7 −0.8 14.6 5.8 1.5 0.1 2.3 2.9 2.6 −22.4
52 SiCC   12(2, 10)–11(2, 9) 297687.6 0.0 297687.7 −0.1 14.5 0.1 156.3 5.0 456.3 5.9 5.6 47.1
53 Si34S v = 1 17–16 298630.4 0.7 298630.0 0.4 4.4 4.0 1.88 0.1 2.17 1.16 0.98 −9
54 Al37Cl   21–20 298670.9 0.2 298670.8 0.1 13.8 0.2 9.85 0.623 17.7 2.81 2.02 −48
55 KCl   39–38 299103.7 0.3 299100.9 2.8 9.6 1.2 5.05 0.633 5.58 ... ... ...
56 NaCl   23–22 299145.1 0.3 299145.7 −0.6 12.3 0.5 13.3 0.857 18.9 2.07 1.55 −18
57 SiCC   13(2, 12)–12(2, 11) 299277.4 0.0 299277.0 0.4 14.2 0.0 94.8 2.70 229 3.30 3.16 85
58 SiCC v3 = 2 13(4, 9)–12(4, 8) 299403.0 0.2 299400.2 2.8 7.2 5.9 1.68 0.259 3.65 4.96 1.47 −10
59 SiS v = 6 17–16 299503.2 0.1 299502.2 1.0 3.1 2.0 0.533 0.122 3.38 8.54 4.66 −20
60 29SiCC   14(0, 14)–13(0, 13) 299546.6 0.2 299546.5 0.1 14.7 1.1 1.44 0.253 9.29 7.18 5.70 33
61 29SiO   7–6 300120.4 0.1 300121.1 −0.7 14.1 0.2 78.5 1.26 162 2.99 2.73 47
62 HC3N   33–32 300159.9 0.6 300159.7 0.2 14.4 0.2 11.7 0.415 29.2 3.79 3.08 −10
63 HC3N v5 + 3v7 33–32 300348.3 1.8 300347.3 1.0 4.3 6.7 2.58 0.430 4.61 3.53 1.42 −40
64 U     300619.0 0.1     5.3 4.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
65 29SiCC   13(8, 6)–12(8, 5) 300756.5 0.4 300750.8 5.7 7.5 4.1 3.10 0.707 9.59 5.45 2.50 −75
66 29SiS v = 1 17–16 301390.4 0.3 301388.9 1.5 4.8 3.2 3.49 0.447 4.84 2.59 0.98 −19
67 SiCC   13(12, 1)–12(12, 0) 301550.1 0.3 301549.9 0.2 15.3 7.2 3.09 0.232 5.69 3.29 1.96 −2
68 SiO v = 1 7–6 301816.7 0.4 301814.3 2.4 9.5 3.4 4.96 0.685 7.68 2.70 1.48 −28
69 U     302069.7 1.1     6.1 1.3 ... ... ... ... ... ...
70 HC3N v5 + v6 + v7 33–32 302118.6 1.4 302120.6 −2.0 14.3 1.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
    l = −1, 1, 1         -                
71 SiCC v3 = 1 13(5, 9)–12(5, 8) 302184.5 0.7 302182.3 2.2 7.5 0.0 6.2 1.3 9.3 ... ... ...
72 SiCC v3 = 1 13(5, 8)–12(5, 7) 302238.6 0.9 302237.7 0.9 11.1 0.9 7.3 0.8 8.7 ... ... ...
73 U     302531.5 0.7     3.8 0.8 2.5 0.6 2.6 ... ... ...
74 SiCC v3 = 1 13(1, 12)–12(1, 11) 302583.2 1.1 302579.0 4.2 9.1 0.1 9.5 2.2 21.0 5.6 2.5 −54.6
75 HC3N v5 + v6 + 2v7 33–32 302696.4 1.9 302694.8 1.6 10.4 2.7 1.7 0.1 1.7 ... ... ...
    l = −1, 1, 2                          
76 HC3N v5 + v6 + 2v7 33–32 302763.0 0.5 302768.7 −5.7 4.0 0.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
    l = 1, 1, − 2                          
77 29SiS   17–16 302850.8 0.3 302849.5 1.3 14.0 0.1 266.4 10.4 439.9 3.7 2.6 −24.6
78 CH3C15N   17(5)–16(5) 303137.0 2.4 303136.4 0.6 7.0 2.4 ... ... ... ... ... ...
79 SiCC   14(0, 14)–13(0, 13) 303373.9 0.1 303373.2 0.7 14.0 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
80 SiCC   13(10, 3)–12(10, 2) 303441.0 0.8 303440.3 0.7 14.3 0.8 51.8 4.6 81.0 3.6 1.6 −33.8
81 U     303512.7 0.2     4.3 0.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
82 U     303842.9 0.6     12.7 0.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
83 SiO   7–6 303927.7 0.0 303926.8 0.9 13.5 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
84 U     303980.9 1.7     5.8   ... ... ... ... ... ...
85 SiS v = 3 17–16 304008.4 0.7 304010.3 −1.9 7.6 2.7 8.3 1.3 8.6      
86 Si33S   17–16 304160.0 0.1 304159.2 0.8 14.2 0.1 32.1 1.0 67.1 3.0 2.9 77.3
87 U     304189.3 0.8     3.3 1.5 1.7 0.3 2.9 3.8 1.4 −37.5
88 U     304247.7 0.7     5.0 1.3 3.5 0.5 4.5 2.4 1.0 −27.9
89 U     304279.8 1.0     3.1 1.1 1.3 0.3 3.1 4.4 1.9 36.9
90 HC3N 2v6 + 3v7 33–32 304308.0 2.0 304307.1 0.9 13.3 2.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
    l = 0, 2, 3f                          
91 C4H   N = 32–31 304423.8 2.0 304422.0 1.8 13.8 1.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 65/2–63/2                        
92 C4H   N = 32–31 304460.0 1.0 304459.9 0.1 14.7 1.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 63/2–61/2                        
93 U     304547.2 2.1     19.9 2.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
94 HC3N v5 + 4v7 33–32 304603.7 0.7     8.3 2.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
    l = 1, 0, 0e                          
95 29SiCC   13(4, 10)–12(4, 9) 304683.0 0.2 304681.8 1.2 14.6 1.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
96 U     304770.0 0.2     11.9 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
97 U     305134.9 0.6     4.8 1.3 2.4 0.2 4.2 3.8 1.5 −27.6
98 SiCC   13(8, 5)–12(8, 4) 305197.5 0.1 305196.7 0.8 14.6 0.1 71.1 2.9 196.9 4.0 3.6 34.4
99 SiN   N = 7–6 305286.9 0.0 305286.9 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 13/2–11/2                        
100 K37Cl   41–40 305445.2 1.6 305442.3 2.9 14.1 7.0 11.9 0.7 16.7 1.8 1.8 −72.5
101 SiS v = 2 17–16 305513.7 0.9 305512.4 1.3 6.6 1.8 13.1 0.7 13.6 0.7 0.4 −76.8
102 U     305578.7 1.6     4.8 3.2 2.3 0.3 3.1 2.0 1.3 7.9
103 29SiCC   13(4, 9)–12(4, 8) 305702.1 1.2 305700.9 1.2 14.2 0.4 8.5 0.6 18.7 3.3 2.9 −83.1
104 SiN   N = 7–6 305792.2 0.0 305792.2 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 15/2–13/2                        
105 AlCl   21–20 305849.8 0.2 305850.6 −0.8 14.0 0.4 45.8 1.6 93.0 3.0 2.8 39.0
106 30Si34S   18–17 306120.0 0.4 306119.9 0.1 15.5 0.2 8.6 0.3 13.3 3.2 2.6 49.6
107 CH2NH   5(1, 5)–4(1, 4) 306172.6 0.2 306172.2 0.4 14.1 0.2 4.0 0.2 15.5 7.2 6.3 80.1
108 U     306226.7 0.3     3.2 0.2 2.1 0.1 2.9 2.4 2.1 −84.1
109 U     306282.4 0.6     3.6 0.6 1.0 0.1 1.3 2.8 1.1 −4.4
110 U     306316.5 0.6     7.3 0.8 2.4 0.3 3.1 2.0 1.8 −51.9
111 U     306449.4 0.5     4.2 0.7 1.2 0.1 1.4 2.3 1.5 36.0
112 SiCC   16(2, 15)–16(0, 16) 306485.7 0.3 306487.5 −1.8 16.0 0.3 2.7 0.2 5.7 4.9 3.4 6.4
113 U     306698.0 0.9     4.2 1.3 0.8 0.1 0.8 ... ... ...
114 KCl   40–39 306729.5 0.4 306728.9 0.6 13.8 0.4 7.6 0.4 9.2 1.9 0.8 −59.2
115 U     306924.6 0.1     10.2 0.1 1.9 0.3 3.1 4.2 1.9 7.2
116 SiCC   13(6, 7)–12(6, 6) 307008.9 0.0 307009.3 −0.4 14.4 0.0 206.9 7.5 448.1 4.5 4.0 28.9
117 SiCC   20(2, 18)–20(2, 19) 307056.8 0.7 307058.0 −1.2 13.7 0.8 1.7 0.1 4.0 5.5 4.0 24.2
118 U     307147.4 0.7     4.7 0.1 1.2 0.0 1.3 2.9 0.4 54.5
119 H3O+   1(1, 1)–2(1, 2) 307199.5 0.3 307192.4 7.1 4.4 0.0 1.8 0.1 2.0 ... ... ...
120 U     307304.7 0.3     13.8 0.3 1.3 0.2 12.7 14.0 10.4 32.0
121 U     307471.0 0.5     4.2 0.6 1.2 0.1 1.2 ... ... ...
122 U     307520.6 0.2     6.7 0.2 4.3 0.3 4.5 0.9 0.7 −77.7
123 U     307693.4 0.2     18.1 0.1 1.6 0.4 5.0 6.1 5.1 −49.0
124 U     307735.5 0.2     2.9 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.7 ... ... ...
125 U     308024.5 0.2     2.5 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.8 ... ... ...
126 U     308038.0 0.2     2.7 0.2 1.3 0.1 1.4 2.9 0.5 37.3
127 U     308217.6 0.2     8.4 0.1 3.4 0.2 4.0 2.1 1.3 13.3
128 U     308337.1 1.7     3.9 0.5 0.4 0.1 2.2 15.5 3.4 −64.0
129 NaCN   21(0, 21)–20(1, 20) 308368.6 0.2 308373.4 −4.8 3.4 0.2 1.0 0.2 1.8 3.4 3.1 −10.5
130 SiS   17–16 308517.5 0.0 308516.1 1.4 14.6 0.0 1605.0 37.4 3714.0 4.6 4.3 23.0
131 U     309201.4 3.2     3.2 2.7 0.9 0.1 1.0 ... ... ...
132 U     309223.4 3.0     6.0 0.7 4.6 0.3 5.0 ... ... ...
133 HC3N   34–33 309251.7 0.5 309250.4 1.3 13.9 0.5 23.5 0.6 50.3 4.4 3.9 6.2
134 SiCC   13(4, 10)–12(4, 9) 309287.2 0.0 309286.5 0.7 14.2 0.0 137.0 5.3 343.8 5.0 4.6 35.6
135 U     309360.6 3.7     6.8 0.6 4.2 0.2 4.7 ... ... ...
136 U     309726.8 0.1     15.5 0.1 2.6 0.2 5.3 4.3 3.7 19.9
137 HCC13CN   34–33 309793.2 0.4 309790.7 2.5 4.7 0.6 2.0 0.1 2.3 ... ... ...
138 SiCC v3 = 2 14(2, 13)–13(2, 12) 309849.2 0.2 309846.2 3.0 7.9 0.3 5.6 0.3 6.5 2.2 1.1 56.5
139 U     310368.3 7.3     10.7 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
140 SiCC   13(4,9)–12(4,8) 310439.0 0.0 310438.8 0.2 14.2 0.0 88.4 2.86 204 3.17 2.93 68
141 HCN v2 = 1 37–37 310472.6 6.8 310471.8 0.8 3.6 0.3 0.932 1.4E-02 1.11 1.49 0.92 −4
142 KCN ?   33(8, 26)–32(8, 25) 310543.7 7.4 310544.2 −0.5 2.2 0.5 0.854 7.4E-02 1.52 3.90 1.18 −3
143 U     310548.7 5.3     2.4 0.7 0.787 0.177 4.07 9.06 3.12 15
144 SiCC v3 = 2 15(0, 15)–14(0, 14) 310930.3 0.9 310931.0 −0.7 9.4 0.2 2.73 0.267 3.70 1.98 1.25 22
145 NaCN ?   20(7, 14)–19(7, 13) 311362.6 0.4 311363.2 −0.6 13.2 0.5 1.20 9.5E-02 2.68 5.18 0.64 −47
146 29Si34S   18–17 311708.0 0.1 311707.6 0.4 14.0 0.6 1.30 0.197 16.1 9.92 8.27 68
147 U     311960.8 1.3     12.9 0.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
148 U     312042.3 1.0     9.3 0.9 4.3 0.2 6.1 4.4 1.5 41.7
149 NaCl   24–23 312109.9 0.3 312109.9 0.0 13.0 0.8 21.7 0.9 28.0 2.0 1.8 68.7
150 U     312165.7 1.5     6.2 0.4 3.2 0.5 5.7 5.1 1.5 64.4
151 SiCC v3 = 1 13(3, 10)–12(3, 9) 312341.7 0.3 312338.8 2.9 10.8 0.4 6.6 0.8 9.4 2.6 2.0 4.5
152 H2C4   35(0, 35)–34(0, 34) 312419.4 1.1 312418.5 0.9 10.6 5.5 2.1 0.4 3.5 6.0 1.7 30.6
153 CH3CN   17(6)–16(6) 312472.7 0.5 312472.6 0.1 14.6 1.2 9.6 0.7 16.0 3.8 2.5 39.0
154 U     312541.7 0.8     14.2 1.6 5.4 0.5 16.3 5.7 4.6 −80.5
155 CH3CN   17(3)–16(3) 312634.3 0.2 312633.7 0.6 13.2 0.2 25.1 1.3 49.2 4.0 3.3 32.7
156 CH3CN   17(1)–16(1) 312684.2 0.2 312683.3 0.9 17.1 0.2 38.4 1.6 83.9 4.7 3.6 23.8
157 SiCC v3 = 2 13(2, 11)–12(2, 10) 312728.8 0.4 312730.1 −1.3 3.5 0.5 4.1 0.1 4.2 ... ... ...
158 30SiCC   14(2, 13)–13(2, 12) 312817.3 1.0 312815.7 1.6 15.2 1.4 3.4 0.4 13.5 8.4 5.3 38.5
159 Al37Cl   22–21 312867.0 0.3 312865.0 2.0 14.4 0.3 24.2 1.8 38.3 3.3 2.5 38.0
160 H2C4   35(2, 33)–34(2, 32) 313570.5 0.9 313572.2 −1.7 13.9 1.0 5.4 0.4 5.3 ... ... ...
161 H2C4   35(1, 34)–34(1, 33) 313788.1 0.5 313792.3 −4.2 6.5 0.5 3.1 0.1 3.2 ... ... ...
162 U     314075.6 0.4     5.5 0.6 3.2 0.2 3.4 0.8 0.6 53.3
163 U     314174.6 0.3     4.0 0.4 3.4 0.3 3.9 1.1 0.8 −34.8
164 U     314228.9 0.3     7.0 0.1 3.8 0.4 4.0 ... ... ...
165 U     314270.8 0.2     3.8 1.0 0.9 0.2 1.2 2.3 1.2 −28.2
166 KCN ?   34(17, 18)–33(17, 17) 314290.1 0.7 314289.5 0.6 4.6 0.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
167 KCl   41–40 314354.8 0.5 314353.8 1.0 13.6 0.5 9.1 0.5 11.2 1.7 1.0 −41.9
168 29SiS v = 4 18–17 314463.6 0.4 314462.9 0.7 4.8 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.9 ... ... ...
169 U     314540.8 0.2     3.2 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.7 ... ... ...
170 U     314600.9 0.4     3.6 0.3 1.2 0.0 1.1 ... ... ...
171 U     314630.1 0.5     3.3 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.7 ... ... ...
172 Si34S v = 2 18–17 314659.0 0.2 314656.9 2.1 5.3 0.2 2.7 0.3 2.9 0.8 0.5 78.9
173 Si13CC   13(2, 11)–12(2, 10) 314814.4 0.2 314814.1 0.3 14.5 0.2 2.3 0.2 10.7 6.1 4.1 59.7
174 30SiS   18–17 315062.3 0.0 315062.5 −0.2 14.3 0.0 110.0 3.4 220.2 2.7 2.7 −44.0
175 SiC   8–7,Ω = 2 315119.9 2.1 315119.9 0.0                
176 NaCN   20(1, 19)–19(1, 18) 315215.4 4.0 315213.6 1.8 11.6 5.5 2.7 0.3 5.7 3.0 2.7 −50.6
177 U     315294.5 0.1     4.3 0.1 5.1 0.1 5.0 ... ... ...
178 U     315317.3 0.2     3.4 0.3 2.6 0.2 2.7 ... ... ...
179 U     315335.6 0.4     3.9 0.6 1.9 0.1 1.8 ... ... ...
180 U     315428.3 0.3     6.2 0.1 3.4 0.3 3.3 ... ... ...
181 Si13CC   15(1, 15)–14(1, 14) 315635.2 0.2 315635.6 −0.4 14.0 0.2 2.3 0.3 5.9 4.0 2.9 −48.9
182 SiCC v3 = 1 14(11, 3)–13(11, 2) 316050.8 0.4 316048.5 2.3 4.0 0.6 6.6 0.3 10.5 ... ... ...
183 Si34S v = 1 18–17 316183.7 0.4 316184.6 −0.9 9.1 0.5 14.7 1.4 23.1 3.1 2.4 −28.4
184 13CS v = 3 7–6 316842.7 0.6 316846.3 −3.6 14.1 0.7 4.6 0.5 24.4 13.6 5.2 52.2
185 U     317094.5 0.7     3.2 0.4 1.2 0.1 1.6 2.6 0.7 −69.8
186 SiCC v3 = 1 15(1, 15)–14(1, 14) 317153.6 0.4 317151.7 1.9 11.0 0.1 11.0 1.4 11.2 ... ... ...
187 29SiCC   13(2, 11)–12(2, 10) 317353.1 2.8 317350.7 2.4 14.1 2.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
188 U     317395.1 0.4     3.5 0.4 ... ... ... ... ... ...
189 U     317419.6 0.4     1.5 2.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
190 29SiS v = 2 18–17 317558.3 0.3 317558.2 0.1 6.1 0.4 5.2 0.7 5.4      
191 Si34S   18–17 317708.7 0.0 317707.4 1.3 14.0 0.0 191.3 7.9 313.3 3.4 1.8 −37.0
192 HC3N v4 35–34 317900.6 0.6 317894.3 6.3 3.5 1.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
193 U     317935.8 1.0     7.5 0.2 ... ... ... ... ... ...
194 U     318027.0 0.9     4.4 0.3 0.6 0.2 2.9 8.3 2.0 −74.4
195 Na37Cl   25–24 318127.5 0.4 318127.7 −0.2 12.3 0.2 6.4 0.6 9.6 2.1 1.6 −27.8
196 13C34S   7–6 318197.8 0.2 318197.5 0.3 13.6 0.4 6.0 0.4 11.1 2.6 2.2 −44.8
197 U     318286.7 1.1     19.7 2.2 5.3 0.7 10.6 3.6 1.7 −25.8
198 HC3N   35–34 318340.5 0.1 318340.8 −0.3 13.7 0.2 13.0 0.7 41.5 4.2 3.5 −4.9
199 U     318412.5 0.7     4.1 0.5 2.0 0.6 7.0 6.6 1.9 53.1
200 30SiCC   21(2, 19)–21(2, 20) 318442.8 0.2 318444.3 −1.5 5.3 0.1 1.3 0.3 3.3 5.8 1.3 19.2
201 c-C3H2   8(2, 7)–7(1, 6) 318483.3 0.5 318482.3 1.0 13.9 0.3 1.6 0.2 6.9 5.7 4.0 −9.2
202 U     318529.9 1.3     4.8 1.7 0.6 0.0 0.8 ... ... ...
203 U     318566.8 0.4     2.2 1.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 ... ... ...
204 U     318685.8 0.3     12.6 0.8 2.0 0.4 11.2 6.6 4.4 −84.2
205 NaCN ?   21(17, 4)–20(17, 3) 318918.8 0.6 318922.3 −3.5 3.1 0.3 1.6 0.1 1.6 ... ... ...
206 U     318951.5 0.7     3.2 0.7 1.7 0.1 1.6 ... ... ...
207 U     319021.1 0.8     13.6 2.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
208 HC3N   35–34 319106.4 0.2 319112.2 −5.8 8.3 0.5 3.9 0.2 4.1 0.8 0.2 −58.2
209 SiCC v3 = 1 14(9, 5)–13(9, 4) 319382.6 0.4 319381.8 0.8 8.3 0.5 7.2 0.4 8.4 1.4 0.8 −5.0
210 HCP   8–7 319571.8 0.2 319572.7 −0.9 15.0 0.1 8.1 1.0 24.0 4.5 2.8 −46.5
211 U     319882.6 0.5     13.1 0.5 2.5 0.4 14.5 6.7 4.8 −2.5
212 29SiCC   15(0, 15)–14(0, 14) 320028.3 0.5 320027.1 1.2 13.7 0.5 7.0 0.9 19.3 5.2 3.9 −45.3
213 NaCN   21(16, 5)–20(16, 4) 320133.2 1.1 320164.6 −31.4 3.7 1.8 2.3 0.1 2.7      
214 K37Cl   43–42 320252.9 1.5 320253.0 −0.1 7.2 1.4 1.9 0.2 3.5 3.9 2.8 46.9
215 SiS v = 4 18–17 320288.0 0.8 320287.4 0.6 2.3 0.8 1.6 0.2 2.5 4.4 1.6 44.3
216 AlCl   22–21 320385.5 0.1 320385.0 0.5 14.0 0.1 58.0 1.9 95.3 2.9 2.7 8.5
217 NaCN   14(2, 13)–13(1, 12) 320482.9 0.9 320494.3 −11.4 3.9 1.0 1.2 0.1 1.9 ... ... ...
218 U     320554.2 0.6     12.0 0.6 4.2 0.9 12.2 5.7 4.3 −4.0
219 29SiS   18–17 320650.0 0.1 320649.7 0.3 14.0 0.1 197.2 5.7 356.5 3.2 3.0 −1.5
220 U     320784.7 5.1     5.7 7.7 1.5 0.2 3.2 6.0 2.4 47.8
221 SiCC   14(2, 13)–13(2, 12) 321133.3 0.1 321131.8 1.5 14.3 0.1 194.8 5.7 474.8 4.5 4.1 32.2
222 U     321436.0 2.3     15.9 1.3 ... ... ... ... ... ...
223 13CH3CN   18(2)–17(2) 321486.9 0.3 321488.9 −2.0 3.0 0.3 2.5 0.3 3.7 3.4 1.8 23.8
224 SiCC v3 = 2 14(4, 11)–13(4, 10) 321619.2 0.4 321618.1 1.1 7.4 0.5 6.7 1.2 9.3 2.4 1.4 −23.9
225 KCl   42–41 321976.7 2.0 321975.5 1.2 4.3 2.0 3.9 0.4 5.3 1.7 1.5 20.9
226 Si33S   18–17 322036.3 0.5 322036.4 −0.1 13.6 0.6 30.3 2.1 59.1 2.7 2.5 58.8
227 U     322107.7 0.9     1.3 0.9 4.4 0.3 5.3 1.4 0.8 84.3
228 SiCC   13(2, 11)–12(2, 10) 322152.1 0.0 322151.4 0.7 14.5 0.0 129.3 5.2 461.5 4.4 4.3 16.2
229 U     322227.1 4.5     5.3 4.3 1.7 0.3 11.0 9.2 4.2 −32.9
230 SiCC v3 = 1 14(7, 8)–13(7, 7) 322487.8 2.2 322486.8 1.0 9.3 1.9 10.8 1.3 14.6 1.8 1.4 15.0
231 SiCC v3 = 1 14(1, 13)–13(1, 12) 322845.3 1.9 322843.5 1.8 10.3 2.7 8.6 1.9 37.2 5.4 4.5 17.2
232 SiS v = 2 18–17 323468.5 2.7 323468.7 −0.2 8.7 3.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
233 NaCN   21(2, 20)–20(2, 19) 323537.0 2.0 323540.7 −3.7 9.0 0.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
234 13CS   7–6 323684.5 0.1 323685.0 −0.5 13.5 0.1 133.4 6.4 343.6 3.6 3.2 3.7
235 SiCC   15(0, 15)–14(0, 14) 324125.1 0.1 324125.1 0.0 14.3 0.1 110.3 5.4 348.3 3.9 3.2 9.4
236 U     324784.9 0.8     6.5 1.0 11.3 1.1 232.0 11.2 10.1 52.5
237 SiS v = 1 18–17 325060.7 0.4 325059.0 1.7 13.7 0.1 66.2 10.6 94.6 2.2 1.1 −5.5
238 SiS   18–17 326649.7 0.0 326649.1 0.6 13.7 0.0 1624.0 73.5 3364.0 4.1 3.0 −3.3
239 SiCC   14(10, 5)–13(10, 4) 326854.4 2.9 326852.0 2.4 14.5 5.5 52.2 8.1 87.4 4.0 2.2 20.1
240 Al37Cl   23–22 327059.5 0.5 327057.0 2.5 13.7 0.6 14.6 2.5 32.8 6.5 2.7 28.9
241 HC3N   36–35 327431.4 0.3 327430.7 0.7 14.0 0.2 14.8 1.8 37.3 5.2 3.7 24.0
242 NaCN   21(6, 16)–20(6, 15) 327589.8 1.3 327586.0 3.8 9.3 1.4 ... ... ... ... ... ...
243 Si13CC   14(4, 10)–13(4, 9) 327926.4 1.3 327921.6 4.8 8.7 1.2 2.9 0.5 20.5 10.1 8.1 43.7
244 U     328027.1 0.4     5.2 0.3 3.7 0.4 4.2 1.2 0.2 −87.0
245 U     328094.9 0.5     5.3 0.2 1.1 0.1 12.0 11.4 4.9 −69.6
246 HC3N v7 l = 1e 36–35 328230.2 0.9 328233.2 −3.0 15.5 0.9 2.4 0.6 3.2 ... ... ...
247 U     328430.6 0.7     11.3 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
248 U     328486.7 1.0     6.3 1.3 1.9 0.2 2.7 2.4 0.8 −26.0
249 U     328620.8 0.4     4.2 0.4 1.7 0.3 2.6 3.0 0.8 −29.3
250 SiCC   14(8, 7)–13(8, 6) 328802.7 0.0 328802.0 0.7 14.2 0.0 82.3 2.6 192.5 2.9 2.8 43.1
251 PN   7–6 328889.8 2.1 328888.0 1.8 16.5 2.7 ... ... ... ... ... ...
252 29Si34S   19–18 329008.4 2.6 329009.4 −1.0 13.3 7.6 2.1 0.4 5.7 4.8 1.9 −48.7
253 U     329086.1 1.1     4.4 1.6 1.1 0.0 1.2 ... ... ...
254 C18O   3–2 329330.7 0.6 329330.5 0.2 14.7 0.4 6.7 0.5 42.6 6.2 5.4 −33.3
255 U     329372.7 1.8     3.3 2.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
256 CH3CN v8 = 1 26(10)–26(8) 329597.2 1.0 329597.1 0.1 9.4 0.2 8.0 0.2 9.1 1.0 0.9 −17.5
257 AlF   10–9 329641.6 0.2 329641.6 0.0 14.4 0.0 24.9 1.3 68.3 3.3 3.2 −59.5
258 C15N   N = 3–2, J = 7/2–5/2 329816.0 0.6 329815.8 0.2 12.0 0.5 5.7 0.9 6.4 1.1 0.1 −54.8
259 29SiCC   14(4, 10)–13(4, 9) 330111.1 0.2 330108.2 2.9 14.4 0.2 5.7 0.8 14.3 4.5 2.9 −31.0
260 Si34S v = 3 19–18 330514.9 0.5 330511.6 3.3 4.2 0.4 1.5 0.0 1.6 ... ... ...
261 13CO   3–2 330588.9 0.0 330588.0 0.9 13.5 0.0 237.2 7.4 1371.0 7.9 6.7 −77.2
262 U     330678.5 4.1     6.7 8.0 8.1 0.5 9.8 1.7 1.3 41.6
263 U     330714.4 9.5     6.6 14.5 2.3 0.3 2.8 ... ... ...
264 CH3CN   18(7)–17(7) 330763.2 4.8 330761.1 2.1 10.5 4.6 10.6 0.4 13.0 1.7 1.2 6.6
265 CH313CN   18(4)–17(4) 330808.1 7.7 330807.7 0.4 13.4 10.4 6.1 0.4 8.9 2.1 2.0 83.5
266 SiCC   14(6, 8)–13(6, 7) 330874.4 0.0 330874.5 −0.1 15.6 0.0 191.3 5.9 397.7 3.4 3.3 58.7
267 U     330939.2 1.8     3.3 1.6 3.3 0.6 4.5 2.3 1.1 89.1
268 30SiS v = 1 19–18 330963.0 4.2 330960.4 2.6 9.5 1.3 12.8 1.5 19.9 2.7 1.7 −15.6
269 CH3CN   18(3)–17(3) 331018.7 1.6 331014.3 4.4 17.5 1.5 24.6 0.9 47.4 3.3 2.3 −34.4
270 CH3CN   18(1)–17(1) + 18(0)–17(0) 331066.9 2.2 331066.8 0.1 17.3 1.0 38.8 0.6 73.8 3.2 2.5 −47.0
271 U     331210.8 2.1     8.2 1.0 1.9 0.1 2.0 ... ... ...
272 U     331418.3 0.6     4.1 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.9 ... ... ...
273 U     331503.7 0.5     6.6 0.6 4.8 0.2 4.7 ... ... ...
274 CH3CN v8 = 1 18(8)–17(8) 331536.2 0.2 331536.7 −0.5 4.3 0.2 4.7 0.2 5.2 ... ... ...
275 CH3CN v8 = 1 18(3)–17(3) 331948.4 0.3 331948.9 −0.5 4.3 0.3 4.2 0.5 5.9 1.7 1.5 −45.1
276 Si34S v = 2 19–18 332122.0 0.6 332121.9 0.1 3.5 0.8 2.0 0.1 2.1 ... ... ...
277 U     332138.8 0.3     2.8 0.3 2.5 0.2 2.9 ... ... ...
278 30SiS   19–18 332551.1 0.0 332550.3 0.8 14.3 0.0 122.6 3.1 243.0 2.6 2.5 22.5
279 U     332585.6 0.8     4.0 4.2 2.2 0.4 10.9 5.4 5.0 −19.9
280 U     332708.8 1.6     4.3 3.0 2.9 0.2 3.2 1.4 0.3 −31.6
281 U     332763.4 3.2     4.2 1.6 2.0 0.1 2.1 ... ... ...
282 U     333224.3 2.0     4.3 5.5 1.6 0.2 2.9 3.6 0.9 −49.9
283 SiCC   14(4, 11)–13(4, 10) 333386.5 0.0 333386.1 0.4 14.5 0.0 119.5 3.8 370.6 3.9 3.6 22.0
284 Si34S v = 1 19–18 333733.5 2.1 333732.0 1.5 6.9 4.0 5.8 0.5 5.8 ... ... ...
285 U     334008.3 0.5     14.4 0.4 6.1 0.7 12.8 3.9 3.2 23.6
286 U     334294.5 0.8     7.2 0.9 2.0 0.3 6.7 6.0 4.7 30.8
287 Si13CC   15(2, 14)–14(2, 13) 334417.2 0.2 334418.9 −1.7 14.7 2.0 2.4 0.3 18.8 14.4 5.6 63.0
288 U     334498.6 0.2     5.0 0.1 3.1 0.2 3.8 2.0 0.9 −4.9
289 SiCC v3 = 1 15(13, 2)–14(13, 1) 334710.0 0.5 334709.1 0.9 7.3 0.4 1.9 0.3 3.0 4.2 1.6 25.8
290 AlCl   23–22 334917.3 0.4 334916.8 0.5 13.5 1.1 63.8 2.4 107.4 2.9 2.6 31.2
291 C34S v = 1 7–6 334972.7 5.9 334971.1 1.6 3.5 3.8 3.0 0.2 3.7 1.6 1.3 65.9
292 U     334995.0 9.1     5.3 8.8 3.0 0.2 2.9 ... ... ...
293 U     335054.7 2.1     9.4 6.6 2.3 0.5 3.3 2.2 1.3 −34.0
294 U     335188.8 10.0     8.6 14.0 5.3 0.4 6.0 ... ... ...
295 SiCC   14(4, 10)–13(4, 9) 335290.7 0.0 335289.7 1.0 14.0 0.0 155.3 4.7 371.7 4.2 3.7 37.8
296 Si34S   19–18 335342.6 0.1 335342.0 0.6 13.8 0.2 185.2 4.6 322.2 3.0 2.7 20.4
297 SiCC v3 = 1 19(3, 17)–19(1, 18) 335428.1 1.6 335426.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.1 0.3 3.7 5.7 4.0 −47.2
298 U     335818.5 0.6     8.6 0.5 ... ... ... ... ... ...
299 SiCC v3 = 2 14(2, 12)–13(2, 11) 336026.3 0.1 336024.2 2.0 11.7 0.9 ... ... ... ... ... ...
300 30SiCC   16(0, 16)–15(0, 15) 336456.9 0.2 336456.9 0.0 4.5 0.2 1.22 3.2E-02 2.33 2.97 2.20 −32
301 HC3N   37–36 336520.0 0.2 336520.1 −0.1 13.7 0.9 8.48 0.416 21.4 3.58 2.97 55
302 29SiS v = 1 19–18 336819.8 0.3 336815.0 4.8 7.5 3.3 5.17 9.4E-02 5.24 ... ... ...
303 U     336876.8 0.5     3.0 5.9 1.37 0.286 3.93 5.04 2.31 44
304 U     336966.2 2.3     6.8 4.5 0.837 0.147 12.0 14.21 6.64 −33
305 C17O   3–2 337061.3 0.1 337061.0 0.3 14.6 0.6 5.11 0.359 37.1 6.95 6.43 80
306 KCl   44–43 337209.1 0.7 337208.9 0.2 10.6 2.8 5.34 0.669 6.70 1.55 0.97 76
307 HC3N v6 = 1 37–36 337334.3 7.5 337335.3 −1.0 6.9 3.0 2.54 0.463 4.31 2.53 1.86 44
308 C34S   7–6 337396.2 0.0 337396.5 −0.3 14.0 0.0 207. 6.65 450. 3.10 2.72 −24
309 U     337506.6 3.1     10.0 10.9 1.85 0.257 15.9 9.68 5.53 32
310 SiCC v3 = 1 16(1, 16)–15(1, 15) 337609.9 0.5 337612.2 −2.3 12.3 0.3 14.2 1.13 19.6 1.71 1.52 50
311 U     337799.8 0.7     3.7 4.8 0.867 0.129 2.71 5.62 2.48 −37
312 CS v = 2 7–6 337913.2 0.5 337912.2 1.0 3.9 3.4 5.76 0.613 6.36 1.28 0.40 9
313 NaCN   21(2, 19)–20(2, 18) 337972.7 1.6 337977.7 −5.0 15.1 7.9 4.22 0.216 6.53 2.46 1.50 −39
314 NaCl   26–25 338022.4 0.5 338021.9 0.5 13.5 7.8 16.8 0.459 19.9 1.35 0.95 −30
315 SiS v = 4 19–18 338066.3 1.4 338064.3 2.0 5.3 5.2 1.87 7.6E-02 2.35 1.70 0.94 −49
316 SiCC v3 = 1 14(3, 11)–13(3, 10) 338259.7 0.3 338252.9 6.8 14.2 3.1 12.3 0.644 17.3 2.34 1.08 −36
317 30SiO   8–7 338929.9 0.0 338930.0 −0.1 14.1 0.0 110.6 3.0 182.6 3.3 2.6 59.6
318 U     338970.8 0.7     3.9 0.4 0.9 0.1 2.1 4.8 3.3 49.3
319 U     339035.6 0.4     3.8 0.4 1.7 0.2 2.2 4.2 0.2 33.2
320 HC3N v5 + 3v7 37–36 339182.0 0.7 339181.9 0.1 7.4 0.6 1.4 0.2 1.7 2.4 1.5 39.3
321 13CH3CN   19(0)–18(0) 339364.7 0.1 339364.7 0.0 13.0 0.1 2.5 0.2 6.4 5.5 3.4 84.3
322 CO v = 2 3–2 339500.9 0.3 339499.5 1.4 1.5 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.8 0.8 59.3
323 U     339592.9 0.9     3.1 1.0 1.1 0.3 1.8 3.3 2.1 −71.1
324 U     339611.8 0.7     5.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 3.8 11.3 4.1 75.9
325 U     339659.3 1.6     3.0 1.8 1.1 0.2 4.4 7.5 4.8 −29.8
326 U     339680.2 0.7     8.2 1.9 7.2 0.6 10.4 2.6 2.1 70.8
327 U     339708.6 1.0     2.9 1.0 1.3 0.2 2.2 5.4 1.5 32.2
328 SiS v = 3 19–18 339745.8 0.6 339743.4 2.4 6.0 0.1 7.2 0.6 10.1 2.9 1.6 0.4
329 Si13CC   15(1, 14)–14(1, 13) 339766.7 2.2 339763.1 3.6 11.7 1.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
330 Si33S   19–18 339910.7 0.1 339911.0 −0.3 13.8 0.1 45.8 1.2 68.1 2.6 2.4 45.3
331 C33S   7–6 340053.5 0.1 340052.6 0.9 14.6 0.0 65.5 2.4 114.3 3.4 2.8 51.1
332 30Si34S   20–19 340102.4 2.1 340101.3 1.1 13.3 3.5 7.3 0.5 10.8 2.7 2.2 19.6
333 CN   N = 3–2 340247.0 1.0 340247.8 −0.8 14.0 1.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 7/2–5/2                        
334 U     340354.7 1.0     14.0 1.0 4.6 0.4 21.2 7.3 6.5 49.1
335 CS v = 1 7–6 340399.6 0.4 340398.0 1.6 9.5 0.2 38.7 0.9 40.6 1.0 0.6 10.0
336 U     340486.5 1.4     9.7 1.4 9.1 0.6 10.7 1.9 1.3 27.3
337 H13CN v2 + 2v3, l = 1e 4–3 340514.1 2.6 340501.3 12.8 2.4 1.7 0.5 0.1 3.3 14.1 3.3 −51.9
338 29SiCC   16(0, 16)–15(0, 15) 340541.1 0.8 340537.9 3.2 15.3 1.1 25.0 1.0 35.5 2.5 2.1 25.0
339 U     340583.5 2.4     5.2 2.4 1.2 0.2 2.3 3.8 3.1 10.1
340 H13CN 2v1 + v2, l = 1e 4–3 340616.1 2.3 340616.5 −0.4 7.1 2.3 0.7 0.0 1.0 ... ... ...
341 29SiCC   15(14, 1)–14(14, 0) 340645.7 0.8 340645.2 0.5 4.1 0.8 3.8 0.1 3.9 ... ... ...
342 U     340771.9 1.7     4.2 0.5 1.5 0.1 1.8 3.0 0.3 23.3
343 U     340801.5 0.7     3.2 0.9 0.6 0.1 6.5 16.9 8.3 48.6
344 U     341072.0 0.7     17.0 0.6 13.2 0.8 27.2 2.9 2.5 7.2
345 NaCN   23(1, 23)–22(1, 22) 341128.9 1.8 341125.7 3.2 12.8 1.6 4.0 0.5 10.0 4.2 2.5 −22.1
346 Al37Cl   24–23 341244.8 0.3 341244.8 0.0 13.8 0.3 21.4 0.9 38.6 2.5 2.2 33.0
347 SiS v = 2 19–18 341423.4 0.4 341422.3 1.1 7.6 0.5 12.4 0.5 12.9 ... ... ...
348 U     341514.7 0.7     3.8 0.8 3.8 0.3 4.2 1.0 0.2 76.4
349 HCN 2v2 + 2v3 47–47 341559.7 1.0 341559.7 0.0 3.5 1.1 2.0 0.1 2.2 ... ... ...
350 U     341577.3 2.6     5.8 2.6 0.5 0.1 3.3 8.8 3.7 85.5
351 U     341673.0 0.8     3.3 0.9 0.9 0.1 1.0 1.3 0.5 51.0
352 NaCN   23(0, 23)–22(0, 22) 341720.6 0.8 341719.7 0.9 11.6 0.7 2.0 0.2 7.1 4.7 3.7 −8.1
353 NaCN ?   22(8, 15)–21(8, 14) 341833.2 0.4 341829.1 4.1 3.6 0.3 1.8 0.2 2.5 1.7 1.4 −38.9
354 NaCN ?   22(8, 14)–21(8, 13) 341875.6 0.8 341875.4 0.2 4.6 0.3 1.3 0.1 2.0 2.3 1.8 −10.8
355 U     341894.1 0.3     2.6 0.2 1.9 0.3 2.8 2.8 0.7 −33.3
356 CC34S ?   N = 27–26 342008.3 0.6 342008.5 −0.2 8.3 0.5 1.9 0.5 2.4 ... ... ...
      J = 27–26                        
357 H13CN v2 + 2v3 l = 1f 4–3 342209.6 0.7 342212.3 −2.7 6.4 0.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
358 SiCC v3 = 1 15(9, 6)–14(9, 5) 342293.5 0.1 342293.2 0.3 8.5 0.1 11.2 0.4 12.8 1.0 0.9 −16.4
359 C4H   N = 36–35 342464.3 0.4 342462.2 2.1 13.8 1.0 5.2 0.5 7.7 2.1 1.5 −33.8
360 SiO v = 2 8–7 342503.4 3.6 342504.4 −1.0 12.5 1.0 4.0 0.3 8.2 3.1 2.3 −14.1
361 U     342600.6 7.7     4.6 1.0 0.4 0.1 1.6 6.0 3.0 45.5
362 CC34S ?   N = 8–5, J = 7–6 342632.0 1.0 342629.2 2.8 4.0 1.0 4.3 0.1 4.1 ... ... ...
363 CO v = 1 3–2 342648.2 0.2 342647.7 0.5 4.9 0.7 6.5 0.3 6.5 ... ... ...
364 U     342744.7 7.2     2.5 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.3 2.8 1.2 −34.6
365 SiCC   15(2, 14)–14(2, 13) 342805.7 0.0 342804.9 0.8 14.5 0.0 181.5 5.6 491.2 3.5 3.3 12.8
366 CS   7–6 342881.7 0.0 342882.8 −1.1 13.2 0.0 1390.0 46.3 3700.0 3.5 3.0 42.3
367 29SiO   8–7 342980.9 0.0 342980.8 0.1 13.9 1.2 88.4 1.73 178 2.68 2.38 35
368 H13CN v1 4–3 343033.8 0.2 343030.9 2.9 5.3 1.4 3.15 0.412 4.86 2.31 1.43 −31
369 SiS v = 1 19–18 343100.6 0.1 343101.0 −0.4 10.6 7.2 63.0 1.65 70.2 1.05 0.68 −22
370 Na37Cl   27–26 343479.8 0.5 343477.8 2.0 9.0 1.4 4.81 0.603 7.59 2.70 1.25 −17
371 U     343929.6 0.0     4.4 1.4 2.40 0.400 3.12 1.89 0.86 −30
372 HC15N   4–3 344200.3 0.0 344200.1 0.2 13.8 4.8 34.6 0.691 81.6 3.05 2.77 50
373 SiS   19–18 344778.6 0.0 344779.5 −0.9 13.5 0.2 945. 22.9 2488. 3.49 3.26 8
374 SiCC   16(0, 16)–15(0, 15) 344906.2 0.0 344906.0 0.2 14.1 1.2 97.2 3.10 229 3.25 2.90 18
375 H13CN v2 l = 1e 4–3 345238.9 0.1 345238.7 0.2 13.9 16.8 27.6 1.35 33.4 1.27 1.09 −77
376 H13CN   4–3 345338.1 0.0 345339.8 −1.7 13.1 0.1 1096. 59.4 3914. 4.29 4.15 −29
377 U     345357.8 8.5     1.3 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
378 HC3N   38–37 345608.2 0.3 345609.0 −0.8 14.5 0.1 3.66 0.136 7.40 2.79 2.52 −33
379 SiCC v3 = 1 15(7, 9)–14(7, 8) 345728.6 0.2 345727.3 1.3 5.7 1.4 5.40 0.906 7.37 1.99 1.12 −43
380 CO   3–2 345794.6 0.0 345795.9 −1.3 13.3 0.1 998. 44.4 5427. 5.89 5.20 −59
381 H13CN 3v2 l = 1e 4–3 345997.5 0.2 345996.6 0.9 3.0 0.2 0.860 0.192 8.71 10.79 5.78 36
382 SiCC   14(2, 12)–13(2, 11) 346109.9 0.0 346110.0 −0.1 14.4 1.2 2.63 200 3.50 3.18 16. 4.59
383 Si13CC   15(3, 13)–14(3, 12) 346313.1 3.3 346307.6 5.5 17.2 2.1 1.37 0.125 19.6 11.06 8.35 28
384 SiO   8–7 347328.9 0.1 347330.6 −1.7 13.9 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
385 CCH   N = 4–3 349338.5 0.2 349337.7 0.8 11.8 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 9/2–7/2                        
386 CCH   N = 4 − 3 349399.4 0.4 349399.3 0.1 12.2 0.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
      J = 7/2–5/2                        
387 AlCl   24–23 349444.6 0.9 349444.0 0.6 14.4 0.1 95.77 6.254 156.8 2.693 2.258 76.5
388 CH3CN   19(0)–18(0) 349454.0 0.1 349453.7 0.3 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
389 HCN 2v3 4–3 349661.4 3.3 349656.3 5.1 19.0 2.9 11.46 2.085 332.1 21.226 14.408 −53.7
390 30SiS   20–19 350035.5 0.3 350035.6 −0.1 13.8 0.3 123.4 4.304 189.2 2.392 2.189 24.0
391 SiCC   15(10, 5)–14(10, 4) 350279.3 0.2 350279.9 −0.6 15.1 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
392 NaCl   27–26 350968.2 0.3 350969.3 −1.1 13.1 0.2 27.6 0.7 38.7 1.6 1.5 −12.1
393 U     351077.2 2.0     11.9 1.7 1.1 0.2 16.9 10.2 8.8 −12.3
394 29Si33S   20–19 351119.8 2.5 351118.0 1.8 14.6 2.8 6.8 0.6 10.5 2.3 1.4 −23.9
395 HCN 2v2 + 2v3 4–3 351177.9 0.9 351172.1 5.8 7.6 0.6 2.9 0.2 3.6 1.5 1.0 −2.5
    l = 2f                          
396 HCN 2v2 + 2v3 4–3 351202.2 1.6 351200.7 1.5 2.2 1.4 0.7 0.1 3.7 5.5 4.8 27.4
    l = 2e                          
397 U     351251.6 1.9     4.3 1.9 1.7 0.1 1.9 ... ... ...
398 Si34S v = 1 20–19 351275.6 0.7 351279.2 −3.6 9.1 0.0 10.9 0.8 12.2 1.3 0.3 −26.5
399 SiCC v3 = 2 16(2, 15)–15(2, 14) 351330.9 0.4 351331.5 −0.6 9.0 0.4 10.3 0.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 −54.5
400 HCN v2 + 2v3 4–3 351347.3 0.5 351347.3 0.0 1.9 0.5 1.6 0.3 2.6 2.4 1.5 21.2
    l = 1f                          
401 U     351382.2 0.6     4.1 0.6 2.2 0.2 2.0 ... ... ...
402 HCN v1 + v2 + v3 4–3 351425.2 0.4 351436.4 −11.2 2.9 0.4 2.8 0.1 2.7 ... ... ...
    l = 1f                          
403 HCN v1 + 2v2 + v3 4–3 351466.7 0.4 351463.7 3.0 3.2 0.3 2.3 0.2 2.3 ... ... ...
    l = 0                          
404 U     351482.8 0.4     2.9 0.4 1.9 0.3 2.3 1.5 0.9 −6.7
405 NaCN ?   23(15, 9)–22(15, 8) 351516.5 0.5 351500.9 15.6 9.2 0.4 0.9 0.1 20.4 13.7 9.6 88.1
406 U     351654.9 0.8     4.0 0.1 1.4 0.4 3.2 4.8 1.3 −32.0
407 U     351756.0 0.8     3.1 0.7 0.8 0.1 2.8 4.3 3.5 39.2
408 U     351776.3 0.3     9.1 0.3 6.8 0.4 26.8 4.6 4.1 29.3
409 KCN ?   38(16, 23)–37(16, 22) 351820.6 0.4 351820.4 0.2 12.8 0.3 4.0 0.7 7.5 3.0 1.6 −39.1
410 U     351940.9 1.9     2.2 1.7 1.2 0.1 1.2 ... ... ...
411 c-C3H2   9(1, 8)–8(2, 7) 351965.9 4.2 351965.9 0.0 13.6 3.8 1.7 0.4 58.6 17.9 11.8 −68.0
412 HCN v1 4–3 352010.6 0.4 352005.8 4.8 13.6 1.2 42.9 1.4 44.8 0.6 0.4 12.6
413 HCN v3 4–3 352088.0 0.4 352087.9 0.1 11.4 0.6 61.4 1.8 65.4 0.7 0.6 −51.2
414 29SiCC   15(4, 12)–14(4, 11) 352159.8 1.1 352154.3 5.5 18.7 1.4 6.8 0.7 19.9 3.7 3.3 38.9
415 U     352199.9 1.0     8.7 0.9 10.1 0.6 14.7 1.9 1.5 24.9
416 H13CN 5v2 l = 1f 4–3 352265.4 4.9 352261.7 3.7 5.9 3.9 0.5 0.0 0.7 ... ... ...
417 SiS v = 6 20–19 352303.0 4.5 352302.2 0.8 3.7 4.0 1.3 0.2 1.8 ... ... ...
418 SiCC   15(8, 8)–14(8, 7) 352436.8 0.1 352436.5 0.3 14.5 0.1 128.1 4.7 284.1 2.8 2.7 29.6
419 U     352558.5 3.0     7.8 2.6 ... ... ... ... ... ...
420 Si13CC   15(4, 11)–14(4, 10) 352638.1 6.3 352640.0 −1.9 14.7 5.4 0.9 0.1 2.5 3.8 2.7 3.8
421 29SiS v = 2 20–19 352802.1 1.4 352805.8 −3.7 5.9 1.2 2.5 0.6 2.7 ... ... ...
422 Si34S   20–19 352974.5 1.9 352973.9 0.6 13.8 0.0 215.8 6.5 342.6 2.7 2.5 33.9
423 c-C3H2   12(2, 10)–12(1, 11) 353118.3 0.8 353126.8 −8.5 5.0 0.7 2.3 0.2 2.4 ... ... ...
424 c-C3H2   11(1, 10)–11(0, 11) 353408.9 3.8 353410.6 −1.7 9.5 0.9 10.2 1.0 14.1 2.5 1.8 26.9
425 U     353447.0 2.9     3.5 2.4 1.4 0.3 3.1 4.6 2.4 −61.5
426 Si13CC   21(3, 19)–21(1, 20) 353489.0 3.8 353491.7 −2.7 4.9 4.0 4.0 0.1 3.5 ... ... ...
427 HCN 2v2 + v3 4–3 353659.5 1.4 353660.3 −0.8 7.0 1.3 14.7 1.1 15.7 1.4 0.1 8.3
    l = 2f                          
428 HCN 2v2 + v3 4–3 353689.9 2.8 353688.3 1.6 5.2 3.1 5.9 0.1 5.7 ... ... ...
    l = 2e                          
429 HCN v1 + 2v2 4–3 353739.9 3.6 353736.9 3.0 4.0 3.7 2.9 0.3 4.4 2.7 2.2 34.6
    l = 2f                          
430 HCN 5v2 + v3 4–3 353769.0 2.7 353772.7 −3.7 7.1 4.1 3.1 0.3 3.4 ... ... ...
    l = 1e                          
431 HCC13CN   39–38 353786.1 2.4 353784.4 1.7 3.5 2.3 1.3 0.1 1.5 ... ... ...
432 13C33S v = 5 8–7 353814.4 0.4 353813.8 0.6 13.9 0.5 33.7 1.8 32.8 ... ... ...
433 U     353899.5 0.5     8.1 0.5 14.7 0.6 15.1 ... ... ...
434 U     354001.9 0.2     14.4 0.1 2.1 0.4 47.6 17.1 15.9 39.0
435 SiS v = 5 20–19 354072.1 0.3 354070.5 1.6 3.1 0.9 1.4 0.1 2.2 3.2 1.1 −49.6
436 CC34S ?   N = 28–27 354253.3 0.6 354256.3 −3.0 3.5 0.5 2.8 0.1 2.2 ... ... ...
      J = 27–26                        
437 HCN 3v2 + v3, l = 3e, f 4–3 354337.2 0.6 354335.4 1.8 6.8 0.6 4.1 0.3 4.8 1.8 1.2 34.9
438 HCN v2 l = 1e 4–3 354460.7 0.8 354460.3 0.4 15.6 1.0 952.6 22.1 1104.0 1.5 1.2 11.3
439 HCN   4–3 354504.0 0.8 354503.9 0.1 13.5 0.1 3373.0 142.4 19995.0 8.0 7.4 36.2
440 SiC   9–8, Ω = 2 354579.1 0.0 354579.1 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
441 HC3N   39–38 354699.1 3.6 354697.5 1.6 13.8 3.0 20.2 0.5 35.7 3.1 2.8 2.8
442 SiCC   15(6, 9)–14(6, 8) 354795.9 0.2 354798.4 −2.5 18.5 0.1 228.5 7.3 475.2 3.9 3.2 58.6

Notes. The designation of the quantum numbers in Columns 3 and 4 follow standard spectroscopic convention. Listed in Column 4 are the rotational quantum numbers, with the upper level denoted first (i.e., JupperJlower). The rotational levels of symmetric tops (e.g., CH3CN) are designated by J(K), asymmetric tops (e.g., SiCC) by J(Ka, Kc), and those with electron spin (e.g., SiN) by N, J. In Column 2, the vibrational states of HCN are designated by the number of quanta in the (v1, v2,  and v3) modes, and the vibrational angular momentum l in the v2 bending vibration. The symmetry of the l-type doublet is denoted by e and f. When e and f are not specified, both states are considered. Similarly, the vibrational states of HC3N are labeled by v4, v5, v6,  and v7, and the vibrational angular momentum as l = l5, l6, l7X, where X = e or f as in HCN.

A machine-readable version of the table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset images: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Figure 2 is a summary of the lines detected in the survey. The strongest is HCN, J = 4–3, at 354503.8 MHz, followed by SiS J = 17–16 and J = 18–17, and various SiCC lines, 48 of which were detected. The rms noise level is shown as a function of frequency in Figure 3. The rms noise is calculated from line-free channels using the Miriad task imstat. The noise peaks at 325 GHz, as expected, owing to the deep absorption caused by terrestrial pressure broadened H2O. The atmospheric transmission curve is also shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Overview of all the detected lines. Top and bottom panels show the same spectrum with different intensity scales.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. rms noise in image channels near detected lines as a function of frequency. The red curve is the zenith atmospheric transmission over Mauna Kea (from a model by Pardo et al. 2001) on a scale of 0%–100%, assuming 2 mm of precipitable water vapor.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 4 presents the spectra with each line numbered following Table 2, and the maps of selected lines are shown in Figure 5. All spectra shown here were made by integrating the continuum-subtracted intensity in a 2'' × 2'' rectangle centered on the continuum peak (using the Miriad task imspec). These spectra were converted to GILDAS CLASS9 format after re-interpolating onto a 1 MHz/channel grid. To help locate the data files of raw or calibrated visibilities, Table 3 lists the dates of observations for a given range of frequencies. Table 4 summarizes the molecules and their isotopic species, with the number of transitions detected in each.

Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. Spectra obtained from the integrated flux over a 2'' × 2'' region centered on the position of continuum peak (star). Flux densities for the lines shown in blue, and cross-hatched filling are three times the y-axis scale. Red spectra with hatched filling are 40 times stronger than the value shown on the ordinate. Each line is labeled with the molecular/isotopologue species and the row number in Table 2. Features appearing as absorption spikes are artifacts caused by imaging-extended emission with limited uv short spacings. Maps of selected lines with spatially resolved emission are shown in Figure 5.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.

Figure 5. Each row in this matrix of images shows the emission at the line with frequency (GHz) written on the leftmost column. The first and second columns are the integrated intensity images at two different scales, to cover the inner and outer parts of the circumstellar shell. The synthesized beam is shown as light-blue filled ellipse in the lower left-hand corner of each image. The third column shows an azimuthally averaged radial intensity profile in black. The radial profile of the beam is shown in red. Columns 4–10 are the channel maps with integrated emission over velocity ranges as indicated on top of each map.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 3. Dates of Observations

Rowa Frequency Date U/L 2 GHzb Sideband
1–29 293972.6–295792.0 2009 Feb 2 Upper LSB
30–52 295960.9–297687.6 2009 Feb 2 Lower LSB
53–60 298630.4–299546.6 2007 Feb 7   LSB
61–68 300120.4–301816.7 2007 Feb 8   LSB
69–83 302069.7–303927.7 2009 Jan 22 Upper LSB
84–104 303980.9–305849.8 2009 Jan 22 Lower LSB
105–123 306120.0–307735.5 2009 Feb 2 Lower USB
124–137 308024.5–309849.2 2009 Feb 2 Upper USB
138–146 310368.3–311960.8 2007 Feb 8   USB
147–160 312042.3–313788.1 2009 Jan 23 Upper LSB
161–180 314075.6–315635.1 2009 Jan 22 Lower USB
181–192 316050.8–317935.8 2009 Jan 22 Upper USB
193–210 318027.0–319882.6 2009 Jan 26 Lower LSB
211–223 320028.3–321619.2 2009 Jan 31 Upper LSB
224–233 321976.7–323684.5 2009 Jan 31 Lower LSB
234–236 324125.1–325060.7 2009 Jan 23 Lower USB
237–242 326649.7–327926.4 2009 Jan 23 Upper USB
243–257 328027.1–329815.9 2009 Jan 26 Lower USB
258–273 330111.1–331536.2 2009 Jan 26 Upper USB
274–283 331948.4–333733.5 2009 Jan 31 Lower USB
284–297 334008.3–335818.5 2009 Jan 31 Upper USB
298–315 336026.3–338259.7 2007 Feb 9   LSB
316–340 338929.9–340645.7 2009 Jan 30 Upper LSB
341–364 340771.9–342805.7 2009 Jan 30 Lower LSB
365–371 342881.7–344200.3 2007 Feb 12   USB
372–382 344778.6–346313.1 2007 Feb 10   USB
383–384 346450.0–348433.2 2007 Feb 9   USB
385–391 348753.4–350398.8 2007 Feb 5   USB
392–421 350968.2–352802.1 2009 Jan 30 Lower USB
422–442 352974.5–354795.9 2009 Jan 30 Upper USB

Notes. aRow number in Table 2. bThe 4 GHz total instantaneous bandwidth of the SMA is divided into two halves, which are processed by separate backend electronics. At the time that our observations were made, the hardware to process the upper half was only partially installed. This resulted in poorer sensitivity, and more eccentric synthesized beam shapes, for lines which fell within the upper half of each observations's spectral coverage. The observations carried out in 2007 had 2 GHz total instantaneous bandwidth.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 4. Summary of Molecules Detected in IRC+10216 in the SMA Line Survey

Molecule/ Row number
Isotopologue in Table 2
AlCl (4) 105 216 290 387
Al37Cl (4) 54 159 240 346
AlF (2) 38 257
CN 333
C15N 258
CO (3) 322 363 380
13CO 261
C17O 305
C18O 254
CS (3) 312 335 366
13CS (2) 184 234
C33S 331
C34S (2) 291 308
13C33S 432
13C34S 196
CCH (2) 385 386
13CCS 47
CC34S (3) 356 362 436
KCl (6) 46 55 114 167 225 306
K37Cl (2) 100 214
KCN (3) 142(t) 166(t) 409(t)
NaCl (4) 56 149 314 392
Na37Cl (2) 195 370
NaCN (19) 14(t) 29(t) 32 40 51 129 145(t) 176
  205 213 217 233 242 313 345
  352 353 354 405
PN 251
SiO (4) 68 83 360 384
29SiO (2) 61 367
30SiO (2) 36 317
SiS (15) 59 85 101 130 215 232 237 238 315
  328 347 369 373 417 435
29SiS (8) 41 66 77 168 190 219 302 421
29Si33S (2) 42 394
30SiS (7) 15 31 49 174 268 278 390
Si33S (3) 86 226 330
Si34S (12) 27 45 53 172 183 191 260 276
  284 296 398 422
29Si34S (3) 11 146 252
30Si34S (2) 106 332
SiC (2) 175 440
SiN (2) 99 104
HCN (18) 5 141 349 389 395 396 400 402 403 412
  413 427 428 429 430 437 438 439
H13CN (8) 337 340 357 368 375 376 381 416
HC15N 372
HCP 210
SiCC (49) 34 37 52 57 58 67 71 72 74 79 80 98
  112 116 117 134 138 140 144 151 157 182 186 209
  221 224 228 230 231 235 239 250 266 283 289
  295 297 299 310 316 358 365 374 379 382 391
  399 418 442
Si13CC (9) 25 173 181 243 287 329 383 420 426
29SiCC (11) 18 60 65 95 103 187 212 259
  338 341 414
30SiCC (4) 30 158 200 300
H3O+ 119
HC3N (18) 62 63 70 75 76 90 94 133 192 198
  208 241 246 301 307 320 378 441
HCC13CN (2) 137 431
C4H (5) 16 17 91 92 359
CH2NH 107
c-C3H2 (4) 201 411 423 424
CH3CN (19) 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 153 155 156
  256 264 269 270 274 275 388
13CH3CN (2) 223 321
CH313CN 265
CH3C15N 78
H2C4 (3) 152 160 161

Notes. The numbers in parenthesis following the name of the species are the total number of transitions, including vibrational states, detected in that species. Assignments of KCN and some lines of NaCN lines are tentative, as denoted by "t."

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

3.1. Continuum Emission

Continuum data were obtained from the line-free channels in the lower and upper sideband spectra from each night of observation. The line density toward IRC+10216 in the 345 GHz band is low enough to allow a good selection of line-free regions. Images of the continuum emission are point like. Results of two-dimensional (2D) Gaussian fits to these images are summarized in Table 5. The continuum flux densities are plotted as a function of frequency in Figure 6. Measurements made during 2007 show a higher continuum flux density by about 15% compared to that of 2009. The spectral energy distribution is consistent with a blackbody curve in the Rayleigh–Jeans approximation, as observed at cm wavelengths by Menten et al. (2006). The continuum emission agrees well with the extrapolated values from cm wavelength measurements (Reid & Menten 1997) and most likely represents photospheric optically thick blackbody emission (S ∝ ν2), with little contribution from circumstellar dust, as shown as a solid line in Figure 7. The dashed line is for S ∝ ν3.2 following Groesbeck et al. (1994) with a value of dust emissivity spectral index β = 1.2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Continuum flux density as a function of frequency is consistent with blackbody photospheric emission (see Figure 7). Blue open symbols are 2007 measurements. The emission appears to be spatially unresolved with the 3'' beam.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.

Figure 7. Continuum flux density vs. frequency including measurements at cm wavelengths from Reid & Menten (1997). The solid line shows a fitted curve for S ∝ ν2 and the dashed line for S ∝ ν3.2.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5. Continuum Emission

Frequency Peak σ Integrated θxa θy P.A.
(GHz) (mJy beam−1) (mJy beam−1) (mJy) ('') ('') (°)
294.95 566.8 10.5 633.1 1.48 1.06 −23.7
296.90 581.2 11.9 643.6 1.43 1.02 −25.9
299.10b 802.3 25.1 897.2 1.01 0.89 −21.2
300.90b 775.4 17.6 883.4 1.21 0.91 −24.6
305.00 636.6 17.6 736.7 1.25 1.02 −41.7
306.90 626.9 11.8 696.0 1.39 1.04 −18.1
308.90 637.2 11.8 705.6 1.39 0.96 −15.6
311.16b 826.8 16.7 906.8 0.96 0.75 4.8
313.00 720.9 19.3 818.2 1.35 1.09 −12.7
315.00 711.1 20.5 825.0 1.14 1.00 −27.6
317.00 670.2 16.5 733.4 1.13 0.74 −12.8
319.00 662.0 18.3 787.4 1.22 1.03 5.1
320.90 781.2 13.3 854.0 1.08 0.85 −44.3
322.90 772.2 15.2 884.9 1.21 0.91 −7.4
325.00 741.4 22.5 876.9 1.32 0.74 −2.0
327.00 788.4 10.6 873.1 1.16 0.77 −17.7
329.00 778.0 20.3 936.5 1.22 1.03 9.9
331.00 751.9 15.1 812.9 0.99 0.32 −28.2
333.00 788.0 14.7 909.4 1.05 0.99 −3.1
334.90 839.2 13.8 929.7 1.14 0.99 17.4
335.50b 903.9 19.5 1051.0 1.22 0.98 11.1
338.40b 1047.0 32.3 1141.0 0.88 0.72 −43.4
339.90 854.8 19.0 904.2 0.90 0.81 50.9
341.90 842.6 16.3 971.5 1.05 1.00 43.5
343.5b 1029.0 22.8 1184.0 1.09 0.86 −31.3
351.90 925.0 21.4 1083.0 1.09 1.00 53.4
353.90 954.0 27.5 1024.0 1.19 0.77 30.2

Notes. aDe-convolved source size from 2D Gaussian fit. bFrom 2007 February observations. (All other measurements are from 2009 observations.)

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Figure 8 shows a distribution of the detected lines with respect to integrated intensities, to estimate the total flux in the lines weaker than our detection limit, following Sutton et al. (1984) and Groesbeck et al. (1994). The slope of the fitted line shown in Figure 8 is −0.4. Integrating the emission below the detection limit of 0.5 Jy beam−1 km s−1, we estimate an integrated flux of 195 Jy beam−1 km s−1 in undetected lines in our survey.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Distribution of line intensities. The fitted line has a slope of −0.4 (excluding the strongest detected lines).

Standard image High-resolution image

4. LINE IDENTIFICATION

The systemic velocity of IRC+10216 is −26.5 km s−1 (He et al. 2008). Since most detected lines show the emission to be spatially centered on the continuum peak, the fitted centroid frequency of the line is assumed to be at the source velocity. Applying this velocity correction to obtain the spectrum as a function of rest frequency, each detected line was fitted to the parameterized shell using the CLASS package. The fitted observed frequencies for known transitions of SiCC agreed well with the published values of rest frequencies in the spectral-line catalogs. The mean difference in frequencies was about 0.5 MHz, (less than the spectral resolution of 0.81 MHz), with a standard deviation of 0.9 MHz. We referred to the following spectral-line catalogs: (1) Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy10 (CDMS; see Müller et al. 2001, 2005), (2) Molecular Spectroscopy database of Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL; see Pickett et al. 1998),11 and (3) the online Lovas line list (Lovas 2004).12 We used the Web site http://www.splatalogue.net, which provides a convenient interface to these line catalogs (Remijan et al. 2010). In addition to the published line catalogs, we have also referred to a line catalog developed at the IRAM 30 m telescope (J. Cernicharo et al. 2000, private communication). We also used the CASSIS software for analysis of spectra.13 Using CASSIS, we looked for a series of lines for each of the molecules known to be present in IRC+10216, based on previous line surveys.

A close match in frequency between an observed and cataloged line is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for identification. Several such matches were found for molecules which have a large number of lines (e.g., methanol and acetone), even though these molecules are dubious in the envelope of IRC+10216. Several exotic identifications were ruled out when the line's entry was grossly inconsistent with its prediction from the molecule's rotational temperature diagram. We have adopted a conservative standard and labeled such lines unassigned. Information on spatial distribution from the maps of these lines may provide additional clues, to help the identification. For example, a majority of the unassigned lines have narrow line widths and compact emission, suggesting that they arise from a region close to the star with high-excitation energies. These could be vibrationally excited lines of known simple molecules, not yet measured in the laboratory.

It is not surprising that the carriers of many of the narrow lines arising from the inner envelope remain unassigned, because for many species laboratory measurements of lines from high lying rotational levels or vibrationally excited states are spotty at best. In general, it is often difficult to assign the rotational spectrum of a polyatomic molecule with three or more atoms to a particular vibrational state. Usually a unique assignment requires either independent rotationally resolved IR measurements, or vibration–rotation coupling constants that may in principle be obtained from high-level quantum theoretical calculations but which frequently are unavailable. Notable examples in which

the laboratory spectroscopy needs to be extended include C6H, SiCC, and even the well-studied stable molecules HCN and HCCCN—all well-known constituents of IRC+10216 and all with many accessible transitions in the radio band.

5. DISCUSSION

5.1. Comparison with Previous Line Surveys

All previous line surveys of IRC+10216 were done with single-dish telescopes, although selected lines have been mapped with the IRAM PdBI and BIMA interferometers. Interferometric mapping of lines in the 345 GHz band presently is only possible with the SMA. Two of the previous line surveys (Groesbeck et al. 1994; Avery et al. 1992) have overlapping frequency ranges with the present survey. Since the sensitivity in the Avery et al. (1992) survey is much poorer than that of CSO's, we compare our results only with the latter. In the overlapping frequency ranges, we find that all of the narrow lines detected in the present SMA survey are missed in the CSO line survey by Groesbeck et al. (1994). This is mainly owing to our four-fold better sensitivity, produced by the greater collecting area of the 8 × 6 m SMA antennas, but also because of the difference in on-source integration time at a given frequency. Multiple tunings per night were used in the observations for the CSO line survey. In our 2007 observations, we had four times greater bandwidth compared to the CSO survey, and in 2009, eight times greater bandwidth.

All the lines detected in the CSO line survey are also detected in our SMA line survey in the overlapping frequency range, with the exception of 29SiS at 338447.3 MHz, and a U line at 338821 MHz, which fall in one of the gaps in our frequency coverage. All the SiCC lines in the CSO survey show a flat-topped profile, whereas in the SMA survey they show the double-horn shape indicating that we are spatially resolving the emission in the expanding shell. A comparison of the peak intensities of the SiCC lines suggests that we are also missing a significant amount of flux due to the interferometer's response to extended emission compared to the ≈20'' diameter of the CSO beam. Similar findings hold for the line profiles and peak intensities of CO, 13CO, C34S, and 30SiO that are common between the two surveys. The CN emission near 340.3 GHz and C2H near 349.4 GHz show very different shapes compared to the CSO observations, again primarily owing to missing flux from extended emission. Channel maps of these lines show the emission to be arising from an expanding shell of radius ∼15''. As noted above, most of the lines in our survey that show spatially compact emission (angular size <5'') and narrow line widths (<10 km s−1) are absent in the CSO line survey. Surprisingly, some of the broader lines, with characteristic expansion velocity of ∼14 km s−1, are also missed in the CSO survey (e.g., C17O at 337061 MHz). The integrated intensity map of this line shows a compact as well as shell distribution, but the weaker emission in the shell may fall at the half-power radius of the 20'' beam of the CSO telescope.

One unassigned line in the CSO survey at 339911 MHz is detected with high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) in our survey and we assign it to Si33S J = 19–18 emission. Note that in Figure 1 of Groesbeck et al. (1994), the line labeled as "U" at around 345.24 GHz is the H13CN line at 345238.7 MHz, as listed in their Table 3.

The Arizona Radio Observatory line surveys of IRC+10216 cover the frequency ranges 130–160 GHz, 219.5–267.5 GHz (He et al. 2008), and 214.5–285.5 GHz (Tenenbaum et al. 2010). These surveys are more sensitive than the CSO survey and even though the frequency range is different from our survey, it is informative to compare the detection of various molecules. Table 4 summarizes all the detected lines in our survey, listed by the molecule or isotopologue. The entries in this table are for assignments based on either detection of several lines, or from well-known molecules in IRC+10216 from previous observations. Some of these assignments are based on a single line, but for many of these, only one transition falls in our frequency range. For example, HCP J = 8–7 is possibly a new assignment. Emission from this molecule in IRC+10216 was reported by Agúndez et al. (2007) and by Tenenbaum et al. (2010). Several molecules detected in the survey by Tenenbaum et al. (2010) are absent in our line survey. These molecules are CP, HNC, l-C3H, c-C3H, C3N, PH3, H2CO, H2CS, and HCO+. It is possible that emission from these molecules arises from spatially extended regions, filtered out by the interferometer, or the lines are simply too weak for our sensitivity (or both).

Figure 5 shows the integrated intensity maps, radial intensity profile (averaged azimuthally), and coarse channel maps for each detected line having spatially resolved emission. Maps of lines which show point-like emission are omitted. Molecules such as C4H, C2H, CN, and SiC show spatially extended emission in a ring-like distribution, with a radius of ∼15'', as seen in previous interferometric observations (e.g., Guélin et al. 1996; Cernicharo et al. 1989). Emission from NaCN, C17O, and C18O appears in both ring and a compact source at the center. Emission from other lines typically show extended structure of diameter ∼5''–10''. Some of the unassigned lines also show extended emission, and the size of the emission may provide a clue on physical and chemical conditions to help with the identification of their carriers. A more detailed study of the spatial structure in selected lines will be presented in a future paper. The imaged data cubes for all detected lines, as well as calibrated visibilities data, are available online on the CFA Web site14.

We note that the spectra shown in Figure 4 have weak features at the level of 2σ–3σ, which are not tabulated in Table 2, but the emission in such lines is seen in integrated intensity maps over selected relevant frequency ranges. An example of such a weak line is the 13CO v = 1 J = 3–2 emission at 327645.5 MHz, shown in Figure 9. This line was expected based on the detection of vibrationally excited CO emission (Patel et al. 2009a). Unassigned lines are included in the complete table of detected lines (Table 2).

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Map of 13CO v = 1 J = 3–2 emission toward IRC+10216, integrated over the velocity interval: −30 to −20 km s−1. The synthesized beam is shown as an ellipse in the lower right corner. The starting contour level and interval is 5σ with σ = 0.15 Jy beam−1 km s−1. This is an example of a weak line that is not clearly seen in the full spectrum (Figure 4) but is clearly detected in the integrated intensity map.

Standard image High-resolution image

5.2. Contribution of Line Emission to Total Submillimeter Flux Density

One of the features of our line survey is that we have also obtained line-free continuum emission. Thus, we can attempt to address the question of what fraction of the total flux density as measured by a bolometer is due to line emission. To obtain the total integrated line emission over the frequency range of the survey, we need to estimate the total flux in the lines that were below our detection limit. Following Sutton et al. (1984) and Groesbeck et al. (1994), we plot a distribution of the detected lines with respect to integrated intensities in Figure 8. The slope of the fitted line shown in Figure 8 is −0.4. Integrating the emission below the detection limit of 0.5 Jy beam−1 km s−1, we estimate an integrated flux of 49 Jy beam−1 km s−1 due to lines within the noise floor in our survey. This is a small correction to the total integrated intensity of all the detected lines of 66798 Jy km s−1 (Column 13 in Table 2). Averaging over the band of 61 GHz (dividing by 56394 km s−1 at 324.5 GHz), we obtain a total line flux of 1.2 Jy over the range of 294–355 GHz. The average value of line-free continuum flux density (Table 5) is 0.9 Jy. Thus, the line emission contributes a fraction of 57% of the total flux. This is comparable to the value of 65% obtained by Groesbeck et al. (1994). We point out three caveats in our comparison of line and continuum emissions. (1) We are likely to be missing a significant flux due to lines arising from extended regions over 20'', (2) in our continuum measurement, we are probably measuring only the compact photospheric emission and missing the flux from extended dust emission, and (3) our continuum flux may still include weak lines, which may be revealed by a more sensitive line survey. Regarding this last point, it should be noted that a recent very sensitive line survey (1σ = 3 mK) has detected more than 700 lines over a frequency range of ∼70 GHz (Tenenbaum et al. 2010). The bolometric measurements of line + continuum flux values at submillimeter wavelengths reported in literature are all typically higher than our value of 2.1 Jy (1.9–9 Jy; Groesbeck et al. 1994; Sopka et al. 1985).

Our measurements of continuum flux from the 2007 data show slightly greater values compared to the 2009 measurements (see Figure 6). According to the light curve of IRC+10216 at 900 μm measured with the SCUBA bolometer at JCMT (Jenness et al. 2002), our 2007 measurements were at the pulsation phase of 0.32 (with phase 0 at maximum), and the 2009 data were obtained at the phase of 0.47 (very near minimum). However, we see a much smaller than predicted amplitude change.

5.3. Isotopic Ratios

Assuming optically thin lines in both the main and rare isotopic species, we can estimate the isotopic abundances from the observed intensities. From the v = 1, J = 19–18 lines of SiS, 29SiS and Si34S, we previously reported near-solar values of isotopic abundance ratios for [28Si/29Si] = 15.1 and [32S/34S] = 19.6 (Patel et al. 2009b). From the J = 18–17 lines of SiS and 30SiS, we find [28Si/30Si] = 14.8 ± 0.2 (19.1–29.0) and [32S/33S] = 53.5 ± 1.3 (85–103). The values in parentheses are from Kahane et al. (1988). Multiple lines from NaCl, Na37Cl, AlCl, and Al37Cl were detected. We find, from AlCl and Al37Cl J = 23–22 lines, [35Cl/37Cl] = 4.3 ± 0.6, which is close to the terrestrial/solar value of 4.13 (Cernicharo et al. 2000).

The isotopic ratios obtained from observed peak intensities are listed in Table 6. There is a significant disagreement between the ratios obtained from various species and transitions. The source of the discrepancy is most likely the effects of optical depth, and lines suspected to have large optical depths are noted in the table. The ratio of N/15N of 1.8 ± 0.1 is very discrepant with respect to the solar value of 272 as well as with the known high value of 5200 in IRC+10216, suggesting that the main transition of HCN used to derive this ratio is very optically thick.

Table 6. Isotopic Ratios

Element/Isotope Source Transition Ratio
S/34S 29Si34S/29SiS J = 17–16 37.8 ± 1.2
  Si34S/SiS v = 2 J = 17–16 10.8 ± 0.6a
  Si34S/SiS J = 18–17 8.5 ± 0.3a,b
  Si34S/SiS v = 1 J = 18–17 4.5 ± 0.6a
  Si34S/SiS v = 1 J = 19–18 10.9 ± 1.0a
  Si34S/SiS J = 19–18 5.1 ± 0.1a,b
  C34S/CS J = 7–6 6.7 ± 0.1a,b
  13C34S/13CS J = 7–6 22.1 ± 0.9
S/33S Si33S/SiS J = 17–16 50.0 ± 0.9b
  Si33S/SiS J = 18–17 53.5 ± 2.3b
  Si33S/SiS J = 19–18 20.7 ± 0.4a,b
  C33S/CS J = 7–6 21.2 ± 0.5a,b
Si/30Si 30Si34S/Si34S J = 18–17 22.2 ± 0.8
  30Si34S/Si34S J = 20–19 29.5 ± 1.4
  30SiS/SiS J = 17–16 12.9 ± 0.2b
  30SiS/SiS J = 18–17 14.8 ± 0.4b
  30SiS/SiS v = 1 J = 19–18 4.9 ± 0.4a
  30SiS/SiS J = 19–18 7.7 ± 0.1a,b
  30SiCC/SiCC 16(0,16)–15(0,15) 79.9 ± 1.5a,b
Si/29Si 29SiS/SiS J = 17–16 6.0 ± 0.2b
  29SiS/SiS v = 2 J = 18–17 1.6 ± 0.2a
  29SiS/SiS J = 18–17 8.2 ± 0.2b
  29SiCC/SiCC 13(4,9)–12(4,8) 10.4 ± 0.3b
  29SiCC/SiCC 13(2,12)–12(2,11) 8.2 ± 0.2b
Cl/37Cl K37Cl/KCl J = 41–40 0.8 ± 0.0a
  Al37Cl/AlCl J = 23–22 4.4 ± 0.3
  Al37Cl/AlCl J = 22–21 2.4 ± 0.1
  Na37Cl/NaCl J = 27–26 5.7 ± 0.5
N/15N HC15N/HCN v3 = 1 J = 4–3 1.8 ± 0.1a,b
C/13C HCC13CN/HC3N J = 34–33 11.8 ± 0.7a,b
  HCC13CN/HC3N J = 39–38 15.9 ± 1.0a
  H13CN/HCN v2 = 1 J = 4–3 34.6 ± 1.6
  H13CN/HCN J = 4–3 3.1 ± 0.1a,b
  13CS/CS J = 7–6 10.4 ± 0.2a,b
  13C34S/C34S J = 7–6 34.2 ± 1.3b

Notes. aAt least one of the transitions is likely to be optically thick. bThe transition in the main species may have extended emission over scales several times larger than the angular resolution of 3''. These transitions may have missing flux leading to an overestimate of the isotopic ratio.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

5.4. Rotational Temperatures

The present survey has resulted in the detection of many rotational transitions in some molecules, including KCl, NaCl, SiS, AlCl, HC3N, and SiCC. Assuming optically thin emission, we can derive the rotational temperature and column densities of the upper levels of the transitions, using the standard formula (e.g., Qin et al. 2010; Goldsmith & Langer 1999):

Equation (1)

where Nu is the column density of the upper energy level with degeneracy factor gu, NT is the total column density, Qr is the rotational partition function, Eu is the upper level energy in K, Tr is the rotational temperature (≈kinetic temperature, assuming LTE), F is the integrated flux density in Jy beam−1 km s−1, θa and θbare the de-convolved source sizes in arcseconds, ν is the frequency of the transition in GHz, S is the line strength, and μ is the dipole moment of the molecule in Debye. From a straight line least-squares fit to the observed values of ln(Nu/gu) versus Eu, the y-intercept gives the column density, and the negative reciprocal of the slope gives the rotational temperature.

Figure 10 shows the rotational temperature diagrams for selected molecules. The poor fits are due to both (1) optically thick emission likely in several transitions and (2) missing flux in transitions with spatially extended emission. For SiCC, lines with Eu < 150 K were excluded from the fit since the emission is expected to be resolved out for the low-excitation lines. The lines of compact emission such as NaCl and KCl appear to have similar strengths, suggesting a very high temperature of 1000 K or more, and similar level populations in the high-excitation states. SiCC lines do not show any clear pattern of cross versus intra K-ladder transitions, as noted before from observations of the much lower J transitions (Thaddeus et al. 1984; Avery et al. 1992). We will report the full results of rotational temperature analysis in a future paper. Preliminary results for SiCC, AlCl, and HC3N are summarized in Table 7.

Figure 10.

Figure 10. Rotation temperature diagram. Only fits to SiCC, AlCl, and HC3N are reliable. For SiCC, lines at lower energies, the emission may be getting resolved, resulting in lower measured intensities. These points at Eu < 150 K were excluded from the fit.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 11.

Figure 11. Distribution of expansion velocities. The gray histogram shows the data from Tenenbaum et al. (2010), which is representative of all previous single-dish line surveys. The white histogram with bold outlines shows the distribution of Vexp from the SMA line survey. Both distributions peak at the terminal velocity of 14 km s−1 but a new population of narrow lines, peaking at ∼4 km s−1 is seen. Lines with Vexp < 10.0 km s−1 are likely arising in the acceleration region of the inner envelope.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 7. Rotation Temperature and Column Density

Molecule Trot (K) NT (cm−2)
SiCC 270 1.3 × 1014
AlCl 527 3.2 × 1014
HC3N 206 5.0 × 1011

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

5.5. Probing the Inner Circumstellar Envelope

Figure 11 shows a distribution of Vexp, the expansion velocities from all the detected lines in the survey, compared with that from the previous single-dish surveys. The important conclusion is that there is a new population of narrow lines, peaking at ∼4 km s−1, with a continuous variation of expansion velocity reaching the terminal velocity of 14 km s−1 (shown by the maximum number of lines). Previous line surveys have missed the narrow lines either entirely (Groesbeck et al. 1994; Avery et al. 1992) or have detected very few of them (He et al. 2008; Cernicharo et al. 2000). More recently, the sensitive line survey by Tenenbaum et al. (2010) has revealed 34 narrow lines. Our greater angular resolution here, by a factor of 4–10, and sensitivity to higher excitation lines have yielded the detections of a large number of these interesting narrow lines. Most appear to be spatially unresolved in our 3'' beam. Examination of the channel maps of these lines shows that the emission is indeed confined very close to the central position at the continuum peak—an indication that we are probably probing the inner envelope within a radius of 50–100 AU from the star (Patel et al. 2009a, 2009b).

Many of these narrow lines are identified as vibrationally excited lines of simple diatomic molecules known to exist in IRC+10216 (Patel et al. 2009b). The upper energy levels of these lines have excitation energies of 1000–3000 K, or higher, consistent with the observation that the emission is spatially compact and close to the star. The unassigned lines typically appear to be narrow (Figure 12), suggesting that they are produced by vibrationally excited transitions of polyatomic molecules whose rest frequencies have not yet been measured in the laboratory. We note that the widths of the narrow lines are still larger than expected soley from thermal broadening. For comparison, a CO line would have an FWHM width of 0.9 km s−1 for a kinetic temperature of 500 K and 1.8 km s−1 for 2000 K.

Figure 12.

Figure 12. Distribution of expansion velocities for the unassigned lines. Most of the lines are narrow, peaking at Vexp ∼ 4 km s−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

It is possible that some of the new lines here may be radiatively excited (Patel et al. 2009b). Because the two epochs of our observations are separated by nearby two years, a time interval similar to the pulsation period of ∼700 days of IRC+10216, we are unable to determine whether the flux density in some of the narrow vibrationally excited lines follows the IR or radio continuum.

Although the narrow line emission is spatially unresolved in the present line survey, we can obtain an estimate of the size of the emitting region (in most cases as upper limits to the actual size), from the 2D Gaussian-fitted de-convolved source sizes. Figure 13 shows the radial velocity profile of the inner envelope up to an angular radius of 3''. For many lines, the S/N is insufficient and the uncertainty in either expansion velocity or the de-convolved source size is too large. The points plotted in Figure 13 were selected only for stronger lines with integrated intensity >0.5 Jy km s−1, with error in Vexp < 1 km s−1, and error in size <0farcs3.

Figure 13.

Figure 13. Expansion velocity as a function of radius. The black curve is from Keady & Ridgway (1993). A subset of 71 out of 442 observed lines which have reliable measurements of Vexp and de-convolved angular sizes were plotted. See the text for details. The red curve is a plot of Equation (2).

Standard image High-resolution image

Also shown in Figure 13 are theoretical velocity profiles. The black curve is the assumed velocity profile used as a model for the analysis of observed infrared molecular lines by Keady & Ridgway (1993, see their Figure 3(a)). The red curve shows the velocity profile given by

Equation (2)

where v is the terminal velocity of 14 km s−1 and θ0 is the dust formation radius of 0farcs13 as assumed by Kwan & Linke (1982). Figure 13 suggests a larger value of θ0 ≈ 0farcs5.

6. CONCLUSIONS

The SMA line survey of IRC+10216 has yielded 442 lines, 293 of which have been assigned to known transitions. Most are from molecules known to exist in the CSE of IRC+10216, including, SiCC, SiS, SiO, CS, C4H, CH3CN, HCN, HC3N, and their isotopic species. Also detected are several lines from salts and metals, including, NaCl, KCl, AlCl, and AlF. More than 100 lines remain unidentified. Maps of these U lines typically show very compact emission, suggesting vibrationally excited lines of known simple molecules, produced very close to the star or even within its photosphere. Assignment of the substantial number of unidentified lines observed in the inner envelope awaits laboratory measurements of rotational transitions from high lying levels in the ground and vibrationally excited states of polyatomic molecules.

We are grateful to Raymond Blundell, SMA director, for his encouragement and support throughout the course of this project. We thank the anonymous referee for a careful review of the manuscript and several helpful comments.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/17