L. Page et al. 2003 ApJS 148 39 doi:10.1086/377223
L. Page1, C. Barnes1, G. Hinshaw2, D. N. Spergel3, J. L. Weiland4, E. Wollack2, C. L. Bennett2, M. Halpern5, N. Jarosik1, A. Kogut1, M. Limon1,6, S. S. Meyer7, G. S. Tucker6,8 and E. L. Wright9
Show affiliationsKnowledge of the beam profiles is of critical importance for interpreting data from cosmic microwave background experiments. In this paper, we present the characterization of the in-flight optical response of the WMAP satellite. The main-beam intensities have been mapped to ≤-30 dB of their peak values by observing Jupiter with the satellite in the same observing mode as for CMB observations. The beam patterns closely follow the prelaunch expectations. The full width at half-maximum is a function of frequency and ranges from 0
82 at 23 GHz to 0
21 at 94 GHz; however, the beams are not Gaussian. We present (a) the beam patterns for all 10 differential radiometers, showing that the patterns are substantially independent of polarization in all but the 23 GHz channel; (b) the effective symmetrized beam patterns that result from WMAP's compound spin observing pattern; (c) the effective window functions for all radiometers and the formalism for propagating the window function uncertainty; and (d) the conversion factor from point-source flux to antenna temperature. A summary of the systematic uncertainties, which currently dominate our knowledge of the beams, is also presented. The constancy of Jupiter's temperature within a frequency band is an essential check of the optical system. The tests enable us to report a calibration of Jupiter to 1%-3% accuracy relative to the CMB dipole.
cosmic microwave background; cosmology: observations; instrumentation: miscellaneous; planets and satellites: individual (Jupiter); telescopes
Issue 1 (2003 September)
Received 2003 February 11, accepted for publication 2003 May 16
L. Page et al. 2003 ApJS 148 39
John J Ermer et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1265
M A Lohe 1977 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10 525
F Delahaye and B Jeckelmann 2003 Metrologia 40 217
Ricardo Weder 2002 Inverse Problems 18 1041
A V Golovnev and L V Prokhorov 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 2765
G. H. Rieke et al. 2004 ApJS 154 25
A Bäcker et al 2002 Nonlinearity 15 1417
B G Gokhale and S N Shukla 1970 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 3 1392
Li Xumo et al 1982 Metrologia 18 203