Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory

James P Miller1, Eduardo de Rafael2 and B Lee Roberts1,3

Show affiliations


A review of the experimental and theoretical determinations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is given. The anomaly is defined by a = (g − 2)/2, where the Landé g-factor is the proportionality constant that relates the spin to the magnetic moment. For the muon, as well as for the electron and tauon, the anomaly a differs slightly from zero (of the order 10−3) because of radiative corrections. In the Standard Model, contributions to the anomaly come from virtual 'loops' containing photons and the known massive particles. The relative contribution from heavy particles scales as the square of the lepton mass over the heavy mass, leading to small differences in the anomaly for e, μ and τ. If there are heavy new particles outside the Standard Model which couple to photons and/or leptons, the relative effect on the muon anomaly will be ~ (mμ/me)2 ≈ 43 × 103 larger compared with the electron anomaly. Because both the theoretical and experimental values of the muon anomaly are determined to high precision, it is an excellent place to search for the effects of new physics or to constrain speculative extensions to the Standard Model. Details of the current theoretical evaluation and of the series of experiments that culminates with E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, are given. At present the theoretical and the experimental values are known with a similar relative precision of 0.5 ppm. There is, however, a 3.4 standard-deviation difference between the two, strongly suggesting the need for continued experimental and theoretical study.


PACS

14.60.Ef Muons

12.10.-g Unified field theories and models

13.40.Em Electric and magnetic moments

13.35.Bv Decays of muons

14.60.Cd Electrons (including positrons)

Subjects

Particle physics and field theory

Dates

Issue 5 (May 2007)

Received 28 February 2007

Published 23 April 2007



  1. Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory

    James P Miller et al 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 795

  2. Report on the second Mock LISA data challenge

    Stanislav Babak et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 114037

  3. Devitrification of the glassy state in suspensions of charged platelets

    M C D Mourad et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 474218

  4. Lutetium oxyorthosilicate block detector readout by avalanche photodiode arrays for high resolution animal PET

    B J Pichler et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4305

  5. Power dissipation in nanoscale conductors: classical, semi-classical and quantum dynamics

    Andrew P Horsfield et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 3609

  6. Beyond Ehrenfest: correlated non-adiabatic molecular dynamics

    Andrew P Horsfield et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 8251

  7. Open-boundary Ehrenfest molecular dynamics: towards a model of current induced heating in nanowires

    Andrew P Horsfield et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 L65

  8. On the stress tensor for asymptotically flat gravity

    Robert B Mann et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 225019

  9. A computational study of λ-lac mutants

    Maria Werner and Erik Aurell 2009 Phys. Biol. 6 046007

  10. On the units of bipartite entanglement: is sixteen ounces of entanglement always equal to one pound?

    M A Nielsen 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 6987

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.