Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory

James P Miller1, Eduardo de Rafael2 and B Lee Roberts1,3

Show affiliations


A review of the experimental and theoretical determinations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is given. The anomaly is defined by a = (g − 2)/2, where the Landé g-factor is the proportionality constant that relates the spin to the magnetic moment. For the muon, as well as for the electron and tauon, the anomaly a differs slightly from zero (of the order 10−3) because of radiative corrections. In the Standard Model, contributions to the anomaly come from virtual 'loops' containing photons and the known massive particles. The relative contribution from heavy particles scales as the square of the lepton mass over the heavy mass, leading to small differences in the anomaly for e, μ and τ. If there are heavy new particles outside the Standard Model which couple to photons and/or leptons, the relative effect on the muon anomaly will be ~ (mμ/me)2 ≈ 43 × 103 larger compared with the electron anomaly. Because both the theoretical and experimental values of the muon anomaly are determined to high precision, it is an excellent place to search for the effects of new physics or to constrain speculative extensions to the Standard Model. Details of the current theoretical evaluation and of the series of experiments that culminates with E821 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, are given. At present the theoretical and the experimental values are known with a similar relative precision of 0.5 ppm. There is, however, a 3.4 standard-deviation difference between the two, strongly suggesting the need for continued experimental and theoretical study.


PACS

14.60.Ef Muons

12.10.-g Unified field theories and models

13.40.Em Electric and magnetic moments

13.35.Bv Decays of muons

14.60.Cd Electrons (including positrons)

Subjects

Particle physics and field theory

Dates

Issue 5 (May 2007)

Received 28 February 2007

Published 23 April 2007



  1. Muon (g − 2): experiment and theory

    James P Miller et al 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 795

  2. Evaluation of x-ray diffraction enhanced imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer

    Chenglin Liu et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 419

  3. Linear projection of technical noise for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors

    J R Smith et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 527

  4. Study of the N = 50 major shell effect close to 78Ni : First evidence of a weak coupling structure in 8332Ge51and three-proton configuration states in 8131Ga50

    D Verney et al 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 49 170

  5. Comparative Study of Time Scale Algorithms

    Patrizia Tavella and Claudine Thomas 1991 Metrologia 28 57

  6. Vibration syndrome diagnosis using a cooling test verified by computerized photoplethysmography

    Andrzej Dyszkiewicz and Michał Tendera 2006 Physiol. Meas. 27 353

  7. Teaching motion with the Global Positioning System

    Marko Budisa and Gorazd Planinsic 2003 Phys. Educ. 38 512

  8. Stochastic resonance

    Thomas Wellens et al 2004 Rep. Prog. Phys. 67 45

  9. The role of the rigged Hilbert space in quantum mechanics

    Rafael de la Madrid 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 287

  10. Designing meaningful density functional theory calculations in materials science—a primer

    Ann E Mattsson et al 2005 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13 R1

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.