S Hofmann 1998 Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 827 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/002
S Hofmann
Show affiliationsBeginning with some introductory remarks about aims and scope, historical background and present state of the art, a brief survey of the technique of sputter depth profiling is given. The fundamental principles of ion/solid interactions during sputtering and the resulting changes in surface composition and surface topography as well as their influence on the conversion of sputtering time to sputtered depth are illustrated by some examples. Together with the specific analysis method employed, such as secondary ion mass spectrometry or Auger electron spectroscopy, these effects determine the shape of the depth profile of interfaces and of thin layers. Recent developments in evaluation and quantification of depth profiles are reviewed with emphasis on the role of the depth resolution function in profile reconstruction, including experimental determination and theoretical modelling of the depth resolution function by the three fundamental parameters: atomic mixing, surface roughness and information depth (MRI model). A summary of optimized experimental conditions for high-resolution depth profiles highlights the use of sample rotation and of low-energy primary ions. Practical application of depth profiling at interfaces is further elucidated by typical examples in the fields of surface and grain boundary segregation, corrosion, oxidation and interdiffusion controlled reactions at thin-film interfaces in electronic materials. An outlook on future trends focuses on theoretical profile simulation methods and on instrumental developments.
68.49.Sf Ion scattering from surfaces (charge transfer, sputtering, SIMS)
68.35.Ct Interface structure and roughness
68.35.B- Structure of clean surfaces (and surface reconstruction)
79.20.Fv Electron impact: Auger emission
Issue 7 (July 1998)
Received 2 January 1998
S Hofmann 1998 Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 827
Kristine M Larson et al 2007 Metrologia 44 484
Charles A Greenhall 2008 Metrologia 45 27
T Pohl et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 L183
R Metzler 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 1830
Neil V Budko and Rob F Remis 2004 Inverse Problems 20 S17
Benoît Saussol and Jun Wu 2003 Nonlinearity 16 1991
R R R Reis et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 353
Tamas Nemeth and Kenneth P Bube 2001 Inverse Problems 17 533
K. Gokhberg et al 2005 Europhys. Lett. 72 228