Shengping Qin et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 R27 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/R01
Shengping Qin1, Charles F Caskey1 and Katherine W Ferrara
Show affiliationsMicrobubble contrast agents and the associated imaging systems have developed over the past 25 years, originating with manually-agitated fluids introduced for intra-coronary injection. Over this period, stabilizing shells and low diffusivity gas materials have been incorporated in microbubbles, extending stability in vitro and in vivo. Simultaneously, the interaction of these small gas bubbles with ultrasonic waves has been extensively studied, resulting in models for oscillation and increasingly sophisticated imaging strategies. Early studies recognized that echoes from microbubbles contained frequencies that are multiples of the microbubble resonance frequency. Although individual microbubble contrast agents cannot be resolved—given that their diameter is on the order of microns—nonlinear echoes from these agents are used to map regions of perfused tissue and to estimate the local microvascular flow rate. Such strategies overcome a fundamental limitation of previous ultrasound blood flow strategies; the previous Doppler-based strategies are insensitive to capillary flow. Further, the insonation of resonant bubbles results in interesting physical phenomena that have been widely studied for use in drug and gene delivery. Ultrasound pressure can enhance gas diffusion, rapidly fragment the agent into a set of smaller bubbles or displace the microbubble to a blood vessel wall. Insonation of a microbubble can also produce liquid jets and local shear stress that alter biological membranes and facilitate transport. In this review, we focus on the physical aspects of these agents, exploring microbubble imaging modes, models for microbubble oscillation and the interaction of the microbubble with the endothelium.
47.63.Jd Microcirculation and flow through tissues
87.50.yt Therapeutic applications
43.25.Yw Acoustic cavitation, vibration of gas bubbles in liquids
Issue 6 (21 March 2009)
Received 3 September 2008, in final form 30 October 2008
Published 19 February 2009
A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 4621
Shengping Qin et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 R27
Steven Trpkovski et al 2005 Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 488
F Eggers et al 1981 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 14 113
Guillaume Kister et al 2004 Smart Mater. Struct. 13 1166
Duncan Lawson 1997 Phys. Educ. 32 321
Sung-Jin Cho et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 640
A K M M Haque and I A M Al-affan 1987 Phys. Med. Biol. 32 1001
N Zhang and Z C Zheng 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 2603
D J Crotty et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 603
Dan A Allwood et al 2009 Phys. Educ. 44 627